PUTIN PURSUES GENOCIDE OF UKRAINIANS
Ukrainians Fight for Their Freedom, and for Our Freedom.
They Fight for all Humanity.
Contents | CAMPAIGN OF GENOCIDE AGAINST UKRAINE & ALL UKRAINIANS
STYLE | VIDEO | Quotes from Russian Media illustrate Russia's Gangster-Style Hatred of Ukrainians
RECRUITED to Spread DISINFORMATION| PRO-PUTIN UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS (in Exile)
VIDEO | Quotes from Russian Media illustrate Russia's Gangster-Style Hatred of Ukrainians
RECRUITED to Spread DISINFORMATION| PRO-PUTIN UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS (in Exile)
EX 1) Vladmir Skachko | Russia Comment: THE 5Ds of Ukrainian DESTRUCTION
EX 2) Ishchenko Rostilav | Turn Ukraine into Depopulated Rump State
#Compilation | Examples of ELIMINATIONIST LANGUAGE against Ukrainians
STYLE | VIDEO | Quotes from Russian Media illustrate Russia's Gangster-Style Hatred of Ukrainians
You Tube Link to RussiaMediaMonitor and its curator Daily Beast columnist Julia Davis
Selected Quotes from 02Sep2023 (see videos below)
Panelist: "In choosing between love or fear, I would choose fear...No one is going to love us, but the will respect us on one Condition: if we don't make excuses and demonstrate nothing but Power and our Capabilities. That is a demonstration of strength!
Moderator: "Remember the saying: If they fear you, it means they RESPECT you."
Panelist: "There is also another expression: If he beats, it means that he loves you."
Russian panelists | Fear is better than Love, If they fear you, then this means they RESPECT you.
Posted on 02Sep2023 by @russianmediamonitor
Russian panelist | Russia is embroiled in a holy war against Ukraine and the West
Posted on 02Sep2023 by @russianmediamonitor
RECRUITED to Spread DISINFORMATION| PRO-PUTIN UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS (in Exile)
The Pro-Putin Ukrianian Oligarch | Viktor Medvedchuk
Radio Free Europe | Disinformation | Apr 2023
Recruited Traitors and Propagandists
Radio Free Europe | Disinformation | Apr 2023
DISINFORMATION | Putin's Oligarch Recruits Traitors to Promote "Another Ukraine"
Putin's friend comes up with "Another Ukraine" and recruits traitors and propagandists
Iryna Balachuk — Wednesday, 26 April 2023 |
iryna.balachuk@pravda.ua
From <https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/authors/4fbf7d8edf344/> and https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news-skhemy-medvedchuk-drugaya-ukraina/32380806.htmlCOLLAGE BY RADIO LIBERTY. ALL PHOTOS FROM THE RADIO LIBERTY WEBSITE
Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch and personal friend of Putin's who is accused of treason and is now living in Russia following a prisoner swap, has founded a "political movement" called Another Ukraine which is attracting fugitives from Ukraine:
political commentators from now shut-down pro-Russian TV channels,
local council members from the Opposition Platform – For Life [a political faction that was headed by Medvedchuk – ed.], and political strategists accused of treason and separatism.
Source: Skhemy project (Radio Liberty)
Details: It was in late January 2023 that journalists first noticed that the Another Ukraine project had begun operating, primarily on Russian social media, where its spokespeople, who have managed to escape punishment and flee Ukraine, parrot or supplement the messages of Russian propaganda.
Quotes from these fugitives and traitors about allegedly "crazy Nazis in Ukraine", "Satanism and lawlessness", "desecration of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra" (Monastery of the Caves) and so on are then picked up and cited by Kremlin-controlled media.
Notably, Medvedchuk's political movement has been joined by:
Volodymyr Skachko, accused under Art. 110.2 of the Criminal Code (encroachment on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine).
Skachko has been wanted by the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) since March 2019. According to the Office of the Prosecutor General, "the accused is on the territory of the Russian Federation, in the city of Moscow", and "the pre-trial investigation has not established any information about the method by which he left the territory of Ukraine".
Volodymyr Skachko
"Political expert" Yurii Dudkin, who was served with a notice of suspicion under Art. 111 (high treason) and 161 (violation of the equality of citizens) in 2021. His case is being considered in absentia, since according to the Prosecutor General's Office, 62-year-old Dudkin left Ukraine in June 2022. According to Skhemy, he left in the direction of Poland through the Rava Ruska checkpoint on 7 June 2022.
Yurii Dudkin
Former Ukrainian journalist Denys Zharkykh, whose public statements prompted an investigation ordered by former Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko. According to Skhemy, Zharkykh crossed the Ukrainian-Slovak border in September 2022. The Border Guard Service did not respond when asked on what grounds Zharkykh, 55, was allowed to leave during martial law. Nor have Yurii Lutsenko and the prosecutor's office answered the question of how the 2018 investigation into Zharkykh's activities ended.
Denys Zharkykh
Political strategist Andrii Mishyn, who has been working for Medvedchuk for at least a decade and fled Ukraine for Russia in January 2023. Mishyn himself told Russian media about his escape through Poland and Belarus, saying that he was afraid of the Ukrainian special services. In 2013, Mishyn was a speaker at Ukrainian Choice, a women's political club, and appeared on pro-Russian TV channels as an expert. The Border Guard Service did not provide an answer when asked on what grounds Mishyn, 57, was allowed to cross the border during martial law.
Andrii Mishyn
Other members of Another Ukraine include political analyst Oleksandr Potemkin, who suggested in 2021 that Volodymyr Zelenskyy should relinquish power to Viktor Medvedchuk, journalist Oleh Yasynskyi (who lives in Chile and has criticised decommunisation in Ukraine), Olena Bronitska (who campaigned for vaccination with the Russian vaccine and used to talk up Medvedchuk), Pavel Karnazitsky (a Belarusian deported from Ukraine for anti-Ukrainian materials), Alexander Dudchak (a political strategist with a Russian passport), Kyrylo Molchanov (a 35-year-old political strategist), and Ruslan Kotsaba (accused of treason in Ukraine, now in the United States; how he managed to cross the border is unknown).
Two members of city councils have also become spokespeople for Another Ukraine:
Bohdan Hihanov (a member of Odesa City Council from the Opposition Platform – For Life faction, who admitted that he had fled Ukraine) and
Maksym Nevinchannyi (a representative of Mykolaiv City Council from Opposition Platform – For Life whose whereabouts are unknown).
Bohdan Hihanov
In total, Skhemy identified 13 spokespeople for Medvedchuk's new project. The SSU refused to answer when asked whether these individuals are involved in criminal proceedings being investigated by the special service, citing a ban on disclosing such information.
The journalists say they asked all of the individuals mentioned in the article to comment, but none of them responded.
From <https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/26/7399586/>
2015feb17 | FPRI | Russia's Use of Disinformation in the Ukraine Conflict - Foreign Policy Research Institute
By John R. Haines fpri.org
John R. Haines is the co-chair of the Eurasia Program, Executive Director of the Princeton Committee, and a member of the Board of Trustees at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. Linkto FPRI 17 feb 2015
.........EXCERPT.....
All warfare is based on deception…
To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
—Sun Tzu
We will not forget! We will not forgive!
—CyberBerkut motto
In the vanguard of the non-linear war now raging in eastern Ukraine is an old weapon, disinformation, wielded by an unconventional force. Exemplifying that force is the hacktivist group, CyberBerkut. It recently issued an ultimatum to Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to end the war in eastern Ukraine that “has plunged the people of Ukraine into an abyss of war, poverty, unemployment and despair.”[1] It directed an additional threat to Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk:
“Mr. Yatsenyuk! We start the countdown. You have three days to stop what you started. In the event our conditions are not met, we will open the world’s eyes to all that is happening in the country. Personal correspondence top officials, telephone calls, secret documents — everything that we found by hacking the computers of employees of Ukraine’s Security Service. You decide: to stop the bloodshed in your own country and start over from scratch, or to commit public suicide in front of millions of people.”[2]
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE From <https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/02/russias-use-of-disinformation-in-the-ukraine-conflict/>
ANALYSIS OF Rostislav Ishchenko PERPECTIVE ABOUT 'Ukraine on the Brink: “The Guilty Blaming the Innocent”'
John R. Haines fpri.org
A Nation Must Think Before it Acts Ukraine on the Brink: “The Guilty Blaming the Innocent”
From <https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/01/ukraine-on-the-brink-the-guilty-blaming-the-innocent/>
“[A]rmed struggle…is conducted by individuals and by small groups. […] It pursues two different aims…in the first place, the struggle aims at assassinating individuals, chiefs and subordinates in the army and police…”
“The old Russian terrorism was an affair of the intellectual conspirator; today as a general rule guerrilla warfare is waged by the worker combatant, or simply by the unemployed worker…”
Vladimir Lenin (1906)
Guerrilla Warfare
“The potential for guerrilla conflict in Ukraine is very high,” says Rostislav Ishchenko[1] in a troubling account published on the Russian news portal Versiya (“Version”).[2]
A few days earlier, Ishchenko published another commentary “After New Russia” on the Russian portal Aktual’nyye kommentarii (“Urgent Commentaries”).[3] He depicts a Ukraine at the brink, facing “growing anarchy and the real threat” that electric power generation will collapse, causing the nation’s “life support systems” — “electricity, gas, heat, sewer, water and other small pleasures that make life acceptable” — to collapse as well. He sees Ukraine driven by the United States “to escalate the conflict” in Donetsk and Lugansk “even if it risks a rapid defeat of Kyev’s forces.” If pro-Russian separatist militias respond in kind by mounting an offensive, Russia would be blamed, hardening the stance of the United States and European Union. Alternately, Ukraine’s armed forces might buckle in the face of determined resistance, forcing President Poroshenko to call for an international peacekeeping force to restore order in eastern Ukraine. Or, Ishchenko speculates, the political infighting in Kyev could provoke a putsch by Right Sector’s Ukrainian Volunteer Corps,[4] and in the resulting chaos, an international peacekeeping force would have to enter the country to restore order. Ishchenko is hopeful, if not optimistic, that Russia might derail what he sees as the United States’ plan for Ukraine, with the most likely scenario being that civil conflict emerges elsewhere in the country in a determined effort to draw Ukraine’s armed forces away from eastern Ukraine.
“Perhaps the Russian government will be able to roll back United States relations with the European Union and at the last minute save Russia’s head, which has already been thrust into Europe’s noose. Russia may be able to force Ukrainian armed forces to redeploy from New Russia, especially if the combat readiness of the Odessa, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya undergrounds are even half of what is claimed.”
Ishchenko elaborates on these underground units’ combat readiness in the Versiya article, claiming pro-Russian groups have ten thousand shtykov (“bayonets”) in the Odessa region, twelve to fifteen thousand in Kharkov, and at least five thousand in Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya. Calling them narodnych mstitieliej [5] or “people’s avengers,” Ishchenko claims many are former Ukrainian soldiers or police officers, some of whom were fired after refusing to take part in anti-terrorist operations in eastern Ukraine.
“Regularly nowadays in Ukraine, freight trains loaded with supplies for so-called “anti-terrorist operations” explode, buildings blow up in which the ultra-nationalists are meeting, and for quite some time now local officials and warlords who risk going home simply vanish. So the guerrilla war is going full throttle. It has not claimed many victims so far, which gives the Kyev authorities grounds to claim that that extent of the problem is being inflated. Meanwhile, the number of arson attacks and bombings continue to grow. Law enforcement agencies apparently can no longer cope, and the other day Odessa was forced to bring in National Guard forces to put an end somehow to vigilantism there.”[6]
By some estimates the number and severity of these incidents are increasing. As to whether “buildings blow up,” Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council on 19 January blamed Russia for a recent explosion in Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second largest city:
“The Russian Federation continues its war against Ukraine as well as acts of terrorism committed on our territory. In particular, the explosion in Kharkiv during which 13 people were injured, 6 of them seriously, is another example of sabotage by the Russian Federation directed against civilians.”[7]
Similar incidents have occurred in Odessa, Mariupol and Kyev. As to Ishchenko’s exploding freight trains, on 20 January an device thought to be a mine destroyed a railway bridge near Kuhnetsovka on the border of the Zaporizhia and Donetsk regions. It derailed a freight train and closed the rail line between Kamysh-Zarya and Rozovka, severing rail access to the port of Mariupol, where separatist units were advancing from the east. The SBU responded by extending “counter-terrorism measures” to the Zaporizhia region. Some believe Russia is targeting the area south and east of an arc extending from Kharkiv — “a critical industrial and communication node” in the country’s northeast — to Odessa — “the freight gateway to Ukraine and the corridor to Transdniestria” — while it encourages separatists to engage in diversionary acts of sabotage in such Ukrainian cities as Kyev, Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk, Nikolaev, and Kherson.[8]
Ishchenko’s warning in Versiya comes only weeks after a Ukrainian weekly, Tyzhdenʹ (“The Week”), published an interview with Ukrainian parliamentarian Andriy Levus. He claimed Ukraine was responding in-kind, with pro-government partisans operating behind separatist lines in the Donbass; and more ominously, with acts of sabotage “on the territory of the Russian Federation.”[9] Levus is certainly in a position to speak with authority: a member of the national parliament representing the Popular Front[10] party of Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Levus is the former deputy chief of Ukraine’s internal security agency, the SBU.[11] During the Maidan uprising against the Yanukovych government, he was the deputy head of “self-defense” forces, an umbrella group of anti-government paramilitaries.[12]
Asked by Tyzhdenʹ whether Ukraine conducts “sabotage operations, similar to what Russia is doing,” [13] Levus answered, “Often our citizens have opportunities in enemy territory. However, we don’t issue press releases or leave Yarosh’s business card.” The reference is to Dmytro Yarosh, the DUK Right Sector[14] leader, and to Russian claims that his business card (vizytku Yarosha) was discovered at the scene of an April 2014 shootout at a separatist checkpoint in Slovyansk.[15] One operation for which the SBU did claim credit occurred on 22 January, when a special operations unit tagged “Dniepr-1″[16] destroyed a freight train outside the city of Sverdlovsk that was transporting coal to Russia. The damage forced authorities to close the main rail line between the southern Luhansk region and Russia.[17] Two days earlier, the SBU announced that it disrupted “a DNR terrorist funding scheme”[18] involving metallurgical coke (made from coal) manufactured in Makiyivkoks and Yasynivsky in the Donetsk region. The plants are owned by Viktor Nusenkis, a Russian citizen associated with former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych. The SBU claimed money from the sale of metallurgical coke exported illegally through a third company in Mariupol was used “to finance militants, mercenaries, and actions aimed at intimidating the civilian population.”[19] This may have been related to a separatist attack a few days against the Avdiyievka metallurgical coke plant, the largest under Ukrainian control and “a strategic target” according to Prime Minister Yatsenyuk, the loss of which would jeopardize Ukraine’s steel production.
When Levus was asked whether he meant sabotage operations in occupied territory, he responded that while “our work [in the Donbass] continues deliberately,” “I’m talking about action in other areas where we have geopolitical interests: on the territory of the Russian Federation.” The “SBU doers not deny conducting sabotage operations on the territory of the Russian Federation,” but “it leaves no trace.” A December 2014 Versiya report[20] on the Tyzhdenʹ interview cited intelligence warnings about the SBU’s deployment of Chechen volunteers[21] to conduct terrorist operations inside Russia.
Tyzhdenʹ asked Levus about the recent escalation of guerrilla activity in the Donbass and the SBU’s role in coordinating efforts there among partisan groups.
“The partisans are a people’s movement which we only help coordinate. It’s not a conventional movement in the sense of an organized group that operates in occupied territory with support, agents and so on. Resistance groups there provide intelligence — people in occupied territory who stay behind to gather information. Then there are units engaged in direct action, who do everything possible to reduce the occupation force’s numbers. Then in newly liberated territory, there are volunteer units engaged in mopping up the enemy, and in counter-subversion[22] to find and eliminate enemy networks. Those are three directions. But to talk about a large-scale movement that is coordinated and controlled by us is an exaggeration.”[23]
It is interesting to see the contrast between Ishchenko’s perspective on the threat of Western intervention and what is for Levus, the hope of it:
“As soon as we do our homework and strengthen our army, the world may find itself on the verge of global conflict, when the global system of checks and balances will finally start working. But if we don’t do our homework and keep fighting, if we just wear pacifism’s rose-colored glasses, why would anyone from Alabama or England fight for us?”
While our generals spend time thinking about where to put checkpoints, Russia will grab another region from us. We should speak frankly about the need to shift from a defensive national strategy to an offensive one. That is the mindset that has to change.”[24]
The deteriorating security situation in Ukraine should concern everyone. As Lenin observed in his essay, “Guerrilla warfare is an inevitable form of struggle at a time when the mass movement has actually reached the point of an uprising and when fairly large intervals occur between the ‘big engagements’ in the civil war.” If the next “big engagement” turns out to be a Ukrainian offensive that withers and collapses — or worse, provokes a separatist counter-offensive backed by full-scale Russian armed intervention — an already a bad situation could quickly morph into a most dangerous one.
As to the two-sided escalation we are witnessing now, Russian separatists promise sabotage and acts of terror in Ukraine’s cities, and militant Ukrainians threaten to bring the fight into Russia proper. To this, Lenin’s concluding observation to the essay written some eleven decades ago has great relevance today:
“It is not guerrilla actions which disorganize the movement, but the weakness of a party which is incapable of taking such actions under its control. That is why the anathemas which we Russians usually hurl against guerrilla actions go hand in hand with secret, casual, unorganized guerrilla actions…”
The unanswered question is whether either side can (or wants) to control the forces of terror each seems determined to unleash on each other, and sadly, on the hapless residents of eastern Ukraine.
“The Guilty Blaming the Innocent” is the title of a 1905 essay by Lenin published in Vperyod (“Forward”), at the time the official organ of the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party that was ancestral to the Soviet Communist Party.
[1] Rostislav Ishchenko is usually identified as president of the Center for Systems [sometimes appearing as “System-based” or “Systematic”] Analysis and Forecasting. The Center’s location is identified in published reports at Kyev, Ukraine, although Ishchenko is described in one profile as “forced to live in Moscow.” [https://en.cyplive.com/ru/news/rostislav-ischenko-soedinennye-shtaty-na-ukraine-uzhe-proigrali.html. Last accessed 19 January 2015] His commentary is notably pro-Russian — in a January 2014 interview with the online news portal The Mirror of Crimea, Ishchenko opined that “Russia has done all that is possible and even more” and “Ukraine will be turned into an anti-Russian battering ram.” [see: https://zerkalokryma.ru/lenta/people/interview/rossiya_sdelala_vso_chto_mozhno_i_dazhe_bol_she/] He is quoted approvingly in the semi-official Russian media on matters related to Ukraine, and is a contributor to Rossiya Segodnya (“Russia Today”), a Moscow-based news agency established upon the December 2013 liquidation of RIA Novosti by decree of President Putin.
[2] “Вышли из леса” (“Out of the woods”). Versia.ru [online Russian edition, 19 January 2015]. https://versia.ru/articles/2015/jan/19/vyshli_iz_lesa. Last accessed 20 January 2015.
[3] “New Russia” or Novorossiya is the name of the proposed confederation between eastern Ukraine’s self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic, respectively. “После Новороссии.” Актуальные комментарии [online Russian edition, 14 January 2015]. https://actualcomment.ru/posle-novorossii.html. Last accessed 19 January 2015. “Urgent Commentaries” is an improved translation of the portal’s name on its web address, where it appears as “Actual Comment” (actualcomment.ru).
[4] The Ukrainian Volunteer Corps is a paramilitary organization established in April 2014 by Ukraine’s Right Sector [Ukrainian: Правий сектор. Ukrainian transl.: Pravy Sektor], a political party organized in November 2013 as a union of several far-right nationalist movements. The Ukrainian Volunteer Corps is sometimes referred to as “DUK Right Sector” for its acronym in Ukrainian, Dobrovolʹchyy Ukrayinsʹkyy korpus. Right Sector claims the UVC/DUK Right Sector is formally independent in deference to a legal prohibition against political parties maintaining paramilitary forces.
[5] Russian: народных мстителей.
[6] Versia.ru, 19 January 2015, op cit.
[7] “СНБО возлагает на Россию ответственность за взрыв в Харькове” (“National Security Council holds Russia responsible for the blast in Kharkiv”). РИА Новости. [online Russian edition, 20 January 2015]. https://ria.ru/world/20150120/1043317306.html. Last accessed 21 January 2015. The suspected grenade detonation near the Moskovsky district court in Kharkiv wounded several Right Sector activists as they left a court hearing.
[8] “Какие города Украины наиболее подвержены угрозе терроризма?” (“What Ukrainian cities are most vulnerable to the threat of terrorism?”). Обозреватель [online Ukrainian edition, 4 January 2015]. https://obozrevatel.com/crime/32458-kakie-goroda-ukrainyi-naibolee-podverzhenyi-ugroze-terrorizma.htm. Last accessed 21 January 2015.
[9] “Андрій Левус: «Успішна постреволюційна Україна – це крах російського проекту».” (“Andriy Levus: ‘A successful post-revolutionary Ukraine would be the collapse of [Russia’s] project’.”). Тиждень.ua [online Ukrainian edition, 22 December 2014]. https://tyzhden.ua/Society/126006. Last accessed 20 January 2015.
[10] Ukrainian: Народний фронт. Ukrainian transl.: Narodnyy front.
[11] The Security Service of Ukraine [Ukrainian: Служба Безпеки України. Ukrainian transl.: Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny] is the country’s main internal security agency with responsibility for counterintelligence and anti-terrorist operations. It is usually referred to by its Ukrainian transliteration’s acronym, SBU. In February 2014, Levus was decreed the SBU’s deputy chief by Alexander Turchinov, the Speaker of Ukraine’s national parliament, who had earlier relieved the SBU’s 11 top-ranking officials of their duties. See: “Andrei Levus appointed deputy head of Ukraine’s Security Service.” ITAR-TASS [online English edition, 27 February 2014]. https://itar-tass.com/en/world/721131. Last accessed 19 January 2015.
[12] Andrew Higgins (2014). “As His Fortunes Fell in Ukraine, a President Clung to Illusions.” The New York Times [online edition, 23 February 2014]. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/24/world/europe/as-his-fortunes-fell-in-ukraine-a-president-clung-to-illusions.html?_r=0. Last accessed 20 February 2015.
[13] It is notable that Tyzhden omitted this exchange from the English language version of the interview. See: https://ukrainianweek.com/Politics/126456.
[14] See footnote (4). Yarosh was reportedly wounded in the Donbass on 21 January 2015.
[15] “‘Yarosh’s business card’ sparks new Internet meme.” Kyev Post [online English edition, 21 April 2014]. https://www.kyivpost.com/multimedia/photo/yaroshs-business-card-kremlin-propaganda-spawns-a-new-internet-meme-344412.html. Last accessed 19 January 2015.
[16] The volunteer unit was organized in the Dnipropetrovsk region in April 2014 and deployed to eastern Ukraine in late summer.
[17] “Батальон ‘Днепр-1’: Партизаны подорвали поезд, которым террористы возили уголь в Россию” (“Battalion ‘Dnepr-1′: Guerrillas blow up a train carrying terrorists’ coal to Russia”). Гордон [online Russian edition, 22 January 2015]. https://gordonua.com/news/war/Batalon-Dnepr-1-Partizany-podorvali-poezd-kotorym-terroristy-vozili-ugol-v-Rossiyu-62516.html. Last accessed 22 January 2015.
[18] The Donetsk People’s Republic is usually referred to in Ukrainian and Russian press reports as “the DNR,” the acronym of its transliterated name in Ukrainian and Russian. Ukrainian: Донецька Народна Республіка. Ukrainian transl.: Donets’ka Narodna Respublika. Russian: Донецкая Народная Республика. Russian transl.: Donétskaya Naródnaya Respúblika.
[19] СБУ ликвидировала схему финансирования террористов через экспорт кокса” (“SBU eliminates scheme to finance terrorists through coke exports”). Гордон [online Russian edition, 20 January 2015]. https://gordonua.com/news/war/SBU-likvidirovala-shemu-finansirovaniya-terroristov-cherez-eksport-koksa-62268.html. Last accessed 22 January 2015.
[20] “Украинские спецслужбы готовят теракты в России” (“Ukraine’s intelligence agencies are preparing attacks inside Russia”). Versia.ru [online Russian edition, 22 December 2014]. https://versia.ru/articles/2014/dec/22/ukrainskie-specsluzhby-gotovyat-terakty-v-rossii. Last accessed 19 January 2015.
[21] “Chechen warriors help Ukraine to deal with Russian terrorists.” Odessa Crisis Media Center [online English edition, 24 October 2014]. https://www.odcrisis.org/en/chechen-warriors-help-ukraine-to-deal-with-russian-terrorists-2/. Last accessed 20 January 2015. The Dzhokhar Dudayev Battallion formed in October 2013 was named for the former president of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria who in 1991 declared its independence from the Soviet Union. Dudayev was killed in an April 1996 Russian missile strike during the First Chechen War. There are published reports that the Dudayev Battallion is comprised of Chechens who came to Ukraine from Austria and other European Union countries where they enjoyed refugee status. [See: “В Украине против Путина и кадыровцев воюют австрийские чеченцы – СМИ” (“Austrian Chechens are fighting in Ukraine against Putin and Kadyrov’s collaborators”). Украинская правда [online Ukraine edition, 8 September 2014]. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2014/09/8/7037097/. Last accessed 19 January 2015] In later October 2014, Ukrainian President Poroshenko agreed to grant Ukrainian citizenship to foreign volunteers. [See: “Иностранцы добровольческих батальонов могут получить украинское гражданство” (“Foreigners volunteer battalions can get Ukrainian citizenship”). Гордон [online Russian edition, 31 October 2014]. https://gordonua.com/news/war/Inostrancy-dobrovolcheskih-batalonov-mogut-poluchit-ukrainskoe-grazhdanstvo-49217.html. Last accessed 19 January 2014]
[22] The SBU’s counterintelligence unit is believed to lead many of these efforts.
[23] Ibid., fn(9).
[24] Ibid., fn(9).
From <https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/01/ukraine-on-the-brink-the-guilty-blaming-the-innocent/>
John R. Haines https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-haines-28a394143/
John R. Haines is the founding chief executive officer of two companies developing proprietary technologies for fissile material detection and interdiction. In a different field altogether, he is Executive Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer of Celularity Corporation, a biotechnology company focused on cellular therapeutics and functional regenerative medicine. Haines earlier co-founded a human stem cell therapeutics company that developed what Nature ranked as the second most dominant stem cell patent estate worldwide. Beginning his career as a mathematical economist, Haines also spent time professionally in maritime operations and government. An honors graduate of Villanova University, he holds advanced degrees from the University of Pennsylvania and its Graduate School of Medicine; from Stanford University; and from King’s College London. He is a life member of both the United States Naval War College Foundation and the United States Naval Institute, and a member of the executive committee of the Friends of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Haines is a Senior Fellow of FPRI and the author of numerous essays and FPRI E-Books, and direct FPRI’s Princeton Committee.
Contact: eurasia@fpri.org
https://www.fpri.org/contributor/john-haines/
EX 1) Vladmir Skachko | Russia Comment: THE 5Ds of Ukrainian DESTRUCTION
Pro-Putin Propagandist
Analysis comments by TULPPP: THIS IS BIBI
NEW Skachko — Degradation as a path of development. New six “de-” of neo-Nazi Ukraine — Ukraina.ru (Sept. 10, 2023)
“These five ‘de-’ then turned out to be primitive, but, alas, obvious:
1) desovereignization – the loss of state sovereignty for the sake of the illusory benefits of staying in the European Union, which did not intend and does not intend to accept Ukraine as a full member;
2) deindustrialization – the destruction of the Ukrainian economy, which could be a competitor to the European or transnational economy;
3) depopulation – a reduction in the population, which is recognized as “excessive” for a reformatted Ukraine, primarily pensioners, the elderly and the sick;
4) de-democratization – replacing generally accepted democratic methods of forming and renewing power with technologies from electoral manipulation of election results to direct coups in the form of Maidans and “color revolutions,” of which there were two in Ukraine. Usurpation of power;
5) de-intellectualization – lowering the educational and intellectual level of the “people” by abandoning the previous education system and introducing technologies for manipulating and dumbing down the minds, primarily of the younger generations.
This has all happened in recent years and continues in Ukraine, breaking all conceivable and inconceivable anti-records and reducing its entire existence to one, but the main “de-” – degradation. But since it is not possible to completely remove the Ukrainian “people” (there must remain aborigines who would work “for their uncle” in the “liberated” and “democratized” territories and lands), then new five “de-” were needed, introduced into the heads of based on rabid zoological nationalism, in fact neo-Nazism. Ukrainian. For what? Legitimate but stupid question. To dupe and properly zombify the remaining population in Ukraine, to brainwash and reformat them (the brains) according to new attitudes and postulates. To completely abandon the past in order to build a new future.”
“The special military operation (SVO) of Russia in Ukraine has completely exposed all the negative processes, but is designed to stop the processes of degradation with which all these eleven “de-” have merged. However, everyone is now deciding how Ukraine will remain, having already been turned into anti-Russia – de-Ukraine, if linguistic research continues.”
Skachko's 6Ds of De-Nazifying and Destroying Ukraine (Full Article Tranlated into English)
Full article translated into English
Degradation as a path of development. New six "de-" of neo-Nazi Ukraine
09/10/2023 (updated: 09/11/2023) [GOOGLE TRANSLATION LINK]
By Vladimir Skachko columnist for the publication Ukraina.ru
For some time now, it has become fashionable to use the prefix “de-” in political slang. Stick it to an adjective, verb or noun and you get a new word with the opposite meaning, a negation of the old one
It’s doubly wonderful for stupid people: you don’t have to look for antonyms (especially if you don’t know what they are). As soon as Ukraine entered the slippery path of “European integration,” which implied the abandonment of previous ties and orientations and the reformatting of the country according to new models, I also supplemented myself with similar exercises. And somehow he identified the so-called five “de-” to which Ukraine has sunk.
Ukraine began to slide a long time ago, from the very beginning in 1991. The fall into the abyss of “de-” continued in 2004 during the first coup d’etat and immediately after it. And then, alas, it continued under the “bloody panda” (as the gang was called then) of President Viktor Yanukovych , who began this disastrous path in 2010 immediately after winning the presidential election.
But he was overthrown for slowness and the final insight into the disastrous course chosen in December 2013. In December he saw the light and realized that only Russia could save him, but in February 2014 he was overthrown...
SKACHKO MAKES ABSURD CLAIM ABOUT UKRAINE DOING 6Ds to ITSELF!
These five “de-” then turned out to be primitive, but, alas, obvious:
1) desovereignization - the loss of state sovereignty for the sake of the illusory benefits of staying in the European Union, which did not intend and does not intend to accept Ukraine as a full member;
2) deindustrialization - the destruction of the Ukrainian economy, which could be a competitor to the European or transnational economy;
3) depopulation - a reduction in the population, which is recognized as “excessive” for a reformatted Ukraine, primarily pensioners, the elderly and the sick;
4) de-democratization - replacing generally accepted democratic methods of forming and renewing power with technologies from electoral manipulation of election results to direct coups in the form of Maidans and “color revolutions,” of which there were two in Ukraine. Usurpation of power;
5) de-intellectualization - lowering the educational and intellectual level of the “people” by abandoning the previous education system and introducing technologies for manipulating and dumbing down the minds, primarily of the younger generations.
IN SUM TOTAL-DEGRADATION (says Skachko)
SIX - This has all happened in recent years and continues in Ukraine, breaking all conceivable and inconceivable anti-records and reducing its entire existence to one, but the main “de-” - degradation .
***
But since it is not possible to completely remove the Ukrainian “people” (there must remain natives who would work “for their uncle” in the “liberated” and “democratized” territories and lands), then new five “de-” were needed, introduced into the heads of based on rabid zoological nationalism, in fact neo-Nazism: Ukrainian.
For what? Legitimate but stupid question. To dupe and properly zombify the remaining population in Ukraine, to brainwash and reformat them (the brains) according to new attitudes and postulates. To completely abandon the past in order to build a new future.
#1 De-Communization
After the coup d'etat in 2014, we started with the first thing - with decommunization (No. 1) . Like renouncing the harmful communist ideology and all the past associated with it. And everything was done: they forcibly erased ideologically and physically destroyed everything that in one way or another connected Ukraine with the communist past, with the communists and their communist leaders. More than 1,300 monuments to Vladimir Lenin alone were destroyed, demonstratively and symbolically. And there are countless monuments to his comrades and other various Leninists.
#2 De-Sovietazation
Then they cast the net wider and began de-Sovietization (No. 2) - the eradication of memory generally associated with the Soviet past and everything that constituted the spiritual foundations of Ukrainian Soviet society. First of all, the achievements that were the moral basis of the life of society went under the knife. For example, the memory of the Great Patriotic War of the entire Soviet people (1941–1945), in which up to 7 million residents of Ukraine died defending their homeland.
In their place came new “heroes” - nationalist collaborators from the OUN* and UPA*, who served the German Nazis, but allegedly fought for an independent Ukraine. And of all the achievements of the Ukrainian people during the period from 1918 to 1991, not the first place came not from industrialization, which brought Ukraine into the category of advanced powers, but from the famine of 1932–1933, promoted and imposed on the public consciousness as “genocide of the Ukrainian people.”
#3 De-Colonization
Further - wider and deeper. When the purely visual symbols of the communist and Soviet past were finished, decolonization (No. 3) came next - a depiction of the entire previous history of Ukraine as part of the Russian Empire (since 1654), and then as part of the USSR (since 1922) as the history of its colonization and deprivation or obstruction of the creation of their own statehood. As part of this process, they even propose to make Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky, who was the first to create the Ukrainian state on the world map, a victim of “decolonization.” But he not only created, but in the situation that arose in the middle of the 17th century, he concluded an alliance with the Russian state and entered it with the rights of the broadest autonomy, which was then squandered and squeezed out for their own benefits by all his followers. This is the real outline of history, but the new rulers of the unfortunate country propose to consider it the “colonization of Ukraine” and therefore “decolonize” everything.
#4 De-Russificaiton
The imaginary violent and deliberate deliverance from “colonial dependence” is natural and organic, but just as violently it develops into de-Russification (No. 4). Total and hopeless. Instilled from bottom to top in all spheres of life - from preschool and school education to communication in everyday life, top of which may well be the idea of creating so-called “language commissars” who would monitor the use of the Russian language in the service sector, in schools, on the streets, in in public places. And who could fine for communicating in “dog language,” that is, in Russian. This is where all these calls come from not just to ban the Russian language, but also to withdraw, destroy, squeeze out of the country, and declare Russian-speaking and Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine second-class citizens.
And this is no longer the mainstream of rabid and reckless neo-Nazis and neo-fascists. And these are not fantasies and fabrications. These are realities. This is government policy. A law on education has already been adopted, effectively removing the language spoken by two-thirds of the country’s population from this sphere. Those who already speak Russian are thrown change in shops and spit in the face in squares. And this is just the beginning - they have already begun to plant...
#5 De-Christianization
And then they also took on the soul, faith and thoughts. A process has begun that can well be called “Orthodox de-Christianization” (No. 5) - attempts to forcibly not only tear out believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) from under the canonical and organizational influence of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and create, having achieved its canonical recognition, some kind of autocephalous Orthodox Church on the basis of the already de facto existing UOC with its own “Kiev Patriarchate”, also not recognized by anyone. It was created in 2018 in the form of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), which in January 2019 even received a tomos (certificate of autocephaly) from Istanbul from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, an ex-captain of the Turkish army under the influence of the CIA.
Today, many are sure: they want to gradually replace Orthodoxy in Ukraine with Uniateism - a cross between the Catholic and Orthodox faiths. She, a crossbreed, was considered a means of colonizing the Orthodox world in eastern Europe (including the lands of present-day Ukraine) since the signing of the so-called religious Union of Brest in 1596. Through slow, but systematic and persistent Catholic proselytism, the Uniate plays exactly the same role now. “Catholic Christmas” in Orthodox Ukraine has already been declared a public holiday and a day off. And this status has been removed from the Orthodox Nativity. And this is accompanied by long-familiar tales that if Ukrainians had accepted Catholicism, which glorifies the pragmatism of man, and not Orthodoxy, which cares more about the soul rather than the body, then they would live well-fed and prosperously, as in the West, and not beggars and -slavishly humiliated, as in “Orthodox Mordor”...
And the result of this approach to Ukraine by external curators and inspirers is already noticeable. The common Christian faith is being destroyed and replaced by new sects, cults and beliefs (from the pagan ancients to the new mental research of the rogues).
#6 De-Humanization
And when the destruction of the spiritual is added to the destruction of the material, then the general degradation is also complemented by general dehumanization (No. 6). And it also risks becoming complete and irreversible. And the history of mankind, alas, knows the death of civilizations, not to mention the nations and peoples who lost their way and got lost in self-deception and cleverly planted lies.
RUSSIA'S OPERATION HAS EXPOSED ALL THESE DE-STRUCTIVE PROCESSES brought about Ukrainians against themselves
The special military operation (SVO) of Russia in Ukraine has completely exposed all the negative processes, but is designed to stop the processes of degradation with which all these eleven “de-” have merged. However, everyone is now deciding how Ukraine will remain, having already been turned into anti-Russia - dis-Ukraine, if linguistic research continues...
* Recognized as extremist and its activities are prohibited in Russia.
EX 2) Ishchenko Rostilav | Turn Ukraine into Depopulated Rump State
Pro-Putin Propagandist "Analyst"
Ishchenko Rostilav: Turn Ukraine into Depopulated Rump State
NEW Ishchenko -– On the issue of the post-war structure of Ukraine – Ukraina.ru (Sept. 11, 2023)
[RUSSIAN AGGRESSOR IS VICTIM] “Let me remind you that military operations against Ukraine have been going on for a year and a half, and it has been drinking blood from Russia for more than thirty years.
[THE OPPOSITE OF REALITY] The Americans would never have thrown Ukraine into the war against Russia if it were not for the all-conquering kleptomania and inability for state building of the Ukrainian ruling elite.
Ukrainian rulers stole Ukraine from themselves and sold it at retail for cheap, only by doing this forcing the Americans to throw this asset into the furnace of war.
Without war, a devastated Ukraine would become too burdensome – more would have to be spent on its maintenance than the damage caused to Russia by the existence of such a Ukraine.”
POST WAR UKRAINE
We will not be able to control post-war Ukraine.
The chances of a pro-Russian or even just a moderate government coming to power there will tend to zero.
And it is not a fact that we will be lucky again and in the next hundred years will have the opportunity to solve this problem by military means.
But for any enemy of Russia, Ukraine is a ready, loyal ally for anything, which does not even need to be persuaded to harm Russia.
It must be borne in mind that in peacetime one can harm much more effectively and for much longer than during war.
Ukraine will be the same as it was - a black hole sucking up Russian resources.
Only a more effectively managed black hole, whose elite will be placed under the direct control of the West and will be led not by the idea of selling everything and running away to Switzerland, but by thoughts of revenge.
OPTIONS
We have the following positions:
1. In the next six months to a year, the West is going to withdraw from the Ukrainian war and conclude a compromise peace with Russia on the condition of maintaining a reduced Ukraine.
2. For Russia, preserving Ukraine will mean
preserving the threat against which the Northeast Military District was launched.
The threat will be temporarily pushed back, but not completely eliminated, that is, the main task of the SVO will not be completely resolved.
3. There is no guarantee that it will be possible to repeat the SVO in the foreseeable future to finish off the surviving Ukraine. Most likely, this possibility will be completely blocked politically by the West during peace negotiations (for example, by issuing overlapping guarantees or by admitting Ukraine to NATO).
4. The window of opportunity to destroy the Ukrainian state by military means will be open until the spring of next year.
By that time, the West is going to increase the military capabilities of the Kyiv regime and provide it with active allies in order to confront Russia with the prospect of prolonging the war for years and expanding its scale, thereby forcing it to agree to a compromise peace on the condition “everyone owns what he controls.”
From here we come to a simple conclusion:
politically, Russia needs to try to defeat the Ukrainian army in one operation on the left bank of the Dnieper, which should unfold immediately after the Ukrainian offensive finally runs out of steam.
Subsequent military operations (on the right bank) should be limited to combing the area and suppressing focal resistance and be completed before the onset of spring.
This is the only way to solve the problem of the complete liquidation of Ukraine.
Is the army capable of solving this problem? Apparently, she is capable.
“A small area with a predominantly agricultural economy is inexpensive to maintain. The new Ukraine will be turned into something like a military settlement:
they feed themselves and are always ready to fight against Russia (the idea of revenge), if only they supply weapons.
A surviving, albeit reduced, Ukraine will be a source of permanent dual loyalty within Russia.
I’m not talking about outright disloyalty. It’s unpleasant, but you can fight it.
I’m talking about double loyalty, which we saw during the collapse of the USSR in the example of the population of the Union republics, when it turned out that for the majority their regional decision-making center turned out to be more important than the all-Union one.”
“Ukraine will be the same as it was — a black hole sucking up Russian resources. Only a more effectively managed black hole, whose elite will be placed under the direct control of the West and will be led not by the idea of selling everything and running away to Switzerland, but by thoughts of revenge.”
---see translation and bio below
For updated information, continue to this tracker:
Russia's Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection
2023sep11 Ishchenko Rostilav Makes Case for Liquidation of Ukraine (not merely a Rump Kiev State)
Full article translated into English
Opinion: Ishchenko Rostilav On the issue of the post-war structure of Ukraine
[google translation link 09/11/2023 ] (Rostilav's Bio attached at bottom of this article)
by Rostislav Ishchenko (author of the Opinion article in Ukraina.ru)
The completely wrong idea of war as an independent matter for the military, who need to “not be disturbed,” is characteristic of any society, not just Russian society.
It is often shared by the military themselves, except for the truly great commanders, who are great because they were able to rise above a narrow professional level
In fact, war and the army waging war are only instruments of politics. It is not the military, but the politicians who decide when the war should start, as well as when and how to end it.
That is why the military (the General Staff) is required to have plans for offensive and defensive wars for all occasions, even the most incredible. The army must be ready for any war (in format and duration) at any moment.
This is ideal. In fact, in moments of prolonged détente in international tension, politicians “forget” about the army, handing it over to the military, who are always “preparing for the last war” and tend to overestimate the weight and role of the army in the state and society.
During periods of prolonged international calm, politicians tend to unjustifiably economize on the army, while the military, in conditions of cut budgets, strive to maintain the previous (achieved in the era of uncut funding) structure and the maximum possible number.
TENSION BETWEEN MILITARY AND POLITICAL LEADERSHIP
The ideal society for a military man consists of only an army. It is not a combat unit in itself, but is included in the army structure, aimed at meeting the needs of the army and subordinate to the army leadership.
The ideal army for a politician is completely devoid of independent ambitions, extremely cheap, absolutely obedient and ready at any time to quickly and effectively suppress any external threat.
From the struggle of these ideals, a certain arithmetic mean is obtained (with distortions in one direction or another, depending on the specific country and the presence or absence of a specific tangible threat in a specific period), more or less adapted for solving military problems, but completely unaware of its role as an instrument of big politics.
Therefore, politicians and military personnel often disagree on the method of warfare, the goals and timing of the campaign, as well as on the terms on which a post-war peace can be concluded.
The military sees in front of them an enemy that it is desirable to destroy completely and forever.
Politicians start from a more complex scheme, in which yesterday's enemy may turn out to be tomorrow's ally.
One of Bismarck's most outstanding achievements, his main victory was not the defeat of France and the proclamation of the Second Reich, but the transformation of Austria-Hungary from Prussia's rival into its ally and junior partner. It was thanks to this political maneuver that the victory over France and the creation of the German Empire, under the leadership of the Prussian king, became possible.
For many years, right up to the beginning of the Northern Military District, Russian policy in the post-Soviet space in general and in the Ukrainian direction in particular was similar in its goals to Bismarck’s policy towards Austria-Hungary.
PRESERVING MOSCOW'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE | NON-MILITARY OPTIONS
Moscow, without encroaching on the political independence of the relinquished territories, sought to turn them into reliable military-political allies and economic partners.
For this, the interests of foreign Russians were sacrificed; for this, Russia made serious economic and political concessions. For this purpose, the CSTO was created, within the framework of which Moscow actually assumed the obligation to ensure the protection of the fallen territories from external threats, despite the fact that the allies’ reciprocal obligations were not worth the paper on which they were written and were openly violated.
For this reason, for decades they tried to breathe life into the amorphous organism of the CIS, half-dead from birth, which was essentially the same CSTO, only in the economic field. By the way, let me remind you that the CIS was originally conceived as an organization with unified armed forces.
This idea of replacing a union state with a union of states was not eliminated until the beginning of the Northeast Military District, which was initially seen from Moscow as assistance to the “healthy forces” in Ukraine in returning the power taken from them by the Nazi putschists and the joining of Kyiv to the union of Moscow and Minsk in any (bilateral or multilateral) format.
MILITARY OPTIONS - WAR
But war is not only a great destroyer, but also a great sobering agent. What in peacetime is nothing more than a set of theoretical constructs and can be discussed for any length of time without getting even a millimeter closer to the truth, during war it is immediately verified by practice.
Allowing yourself to maintain a delusion about the nature of your political opponent during a war is guaranteed to lose the war. That is why, having encountered unexpected fierce resistance in Ukraine, Russia was forced to reconsider not only the initial concept of the North Military District, but also the hitherto dominant idea of the form of organization of the post-Soviet space.
Many did not notice, but if earlier Moscow tried to work with neighboring countries with the help of institutions specially created for this purpose (CIS, CSTO, etc.), then in the last year and a half almost nothing has been heard about the active role of these entities, and the main mechanisms of interaction with neighboring countries have been transferred to the standard international level. The term “near abroad” itself has practically fallen out of use. Work with the relevant states is carried out within the framework of the standard mechanisms of the “Great Game”; the main efforts have been transferred to the platforms of joint Russian-Chinese structures created to counter the United States, as well as to balance and promote the interests of Moscow and Beijing, initially in Eurasia, and now throughout planet.
The design of the SVO has also changed. There was no official renaming, but state propaganda stopped avoiding the term “war” in relation to this operation. This is understandable, initially, when the Northern Military District was more thought of as a military demonstration in support of the internal Ukrainian opposition to the Nazi regime, the term “war”, which had too strong a semantic load, was politically flawed - a liberation campaign cannot be a war. But the liberation campaign cannot last almost two years and be accompanied by the death at the front of hundreds of thousands of liberated people who fought against liberation.
Having officially recognized that the Americans and their allies have unleashed a proxy war against us, the mechanism and striking force of which is Ukraine, we de facto recognized Kyiv as a party fighting against us. The official preservation of the term SVO allows us to maintain some beneficial restrictions on military action. In particular, the United States and its allies are forced to generally comply with the requirement to exclude Russian territory (within the borders they recognize) from full-fledged combat operations. But, apparently, in the near future this restriction will also become history.
Already now, the territory of Russia (within the borders recognized by the West) is being shelled, enemy DRGs are entering it, and the absence of a direct invasion by the Ukrainian Armed Forces can be explained more by a lack of potential for carrying out serious operations and a reluctance to lengthen the front line than by actual compliance with any restrictions. Ukraine is receiving increasingly long-range weapons from the West, and as the military-political catastrophe in Kyiv approaches, Ukrainian politicians are increasingly shifting their stakes from the immediate military sphere to the political-psychological sphere, no longer counting on victory on the battlefield, but on undermining the spirit of the Russian people .
***
For this purpose, the adventurous concept of “transferring the war” to Russian territory was adopted, which involves not only missile and drone strikes on military targets and political centers in the depths of Russia, but also a direct invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Today, Kyiv is stopped only by its inability to organize such an invasion due to the lack of forces and means among the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Nevertheless, Ukraine will try not only to continue terrorist attacks on Russian territory by Ukrainian DRGs and shelling of civilians, but also to intensify them. Terror against civilians is the last straw of the Nazi regime.
However, only Kyiv believes in terror as a means of salvation. Even the Western partners of the Ukrainian government - the main beneficiaries of the ongoing hostilities - have already realized that victory over Russia within the framework of the Ukrainian crisis will not be achieved and it is necessary to think about the format of a post-war settlement. The West’s task will be to prevent Russia from consolidating its military-political success at the negotiating table and diplomatically winning back what it has lost.
TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY
At the same time, they see the loss not in the loss of territories. The visible expansion or contraction of borders has a significant effect on the emotionally sensitive population, but rarely do any territories in the modern world have such strategic importance as Gibraltar, Alaska, the Isthmus of Suez or the Turkish Straits. The main defeat for the West is the loss of Ukraine as a mechanism for influencing Russia. From an American point of view, the Ukrainian-Russian confrontation is the same as if Texas seceded from the United States and, relying on Russia, began the struggle for the collapse and destruction of America.
Therefore, all Western “peace plans” revolve exclusively around territorial changes. They agree to cede more or less territory to Russia, agree to consider the possibility of separating the western regions from Ukraine in favor of several Eastern European states, but they strive to preserve at least some Ukraine, at least within the borders of the Kyiv region alone, which is the undoubted and legitimate successor of the current Ukraine.
Many of our citizens say:
“Just think, there will be some piece of land left with almost no population, no economy, and only debts. Well, let. Who are they dangerous to?”
This is a fundamentally wrong approach. They will be dangerous, arch-dangerous, even if they retain not the region, but only half of Kyiv.
Let me remind you that military operations against Ukraine have been going on for a year and a half, and it has been drinking blood from Russia for more than thirty years.
The Americans would never have thrown Ukraine into the war against Russia if it were not for the all-conquering kleptomania and inability for state building of the Ukrainian ruling elite. Ukrainian rulers stole Ukraine from themselves and sold it at retail for cheap, only by doing this forcing the Americans to throw this asset into the furnace of war. Without war, a devastated Ukraine would become too burdensome—more would have to be spent on its maintenance than the damage caused to Russia by the existence of such a Ukraine.
And it was somehow inconvenient when, right on the borders of prosperous Russia, the West’s main partner in the post-Soviet space was begging—some kind of anti-advertising.
And so we can say that if not for the military pogrom, Ukraine would have been the most prosperous state in Eastern, and perhaps Western Europe. That is, the West has nothing to do with it anymore - “Russia is to blame.”
REDUCED POST-WAR UKRAINE
In a reduced post-war Ukraine, the West will have the opportunity to reassemble the elite and place it under more reliable control, since its “right” to power will be directly dependent on Western support.
This reduced Ukraine will be given a national myth about the “great victory” in the struggle for independence, won over a nuclear superpower. The price, they say, was high (in both lives and territories), but the main value - independence - was won.
A small area with a predominantly agricultural economy is inexpensive to maintain.
The new Ukraine will be turned into something like a military settlement:
they feed themselves and are always ready to fight against Russia (the idea of revenge), if only they supply weapons. A surviving, albeit reduced, Ukraine will be a source of permanent dual loyalty within Russia. I'm not talking about outright disloyalty.
It's unpleasant, but you can fight it. I’m talking about double loyalty, which we saw during the collapse of the USSR in the example of the population of the Union republics, when it turned out that for the majority their regional decision-making center turned out to be more important than the all-Union one.
Making Case for Liquidation - Dual Loyalty
Until the crisis happened, no one noticed this double loyalty, but in times of crisis it turned out to be one of the most important reasons for the collapse.
It’s not that the population of the republics was for the disintegration - they were not against it. The reason was that their own authorities were preserved, at first nothing changed, except that the capital, and with it the government, were closer, which was even considered by many as a good thing.
The presence of a second “own” state for former citizens of Ukraine, along with Russia, is a source of potential double loyalty.
So far, everything is fine in Russia; absolute loyalty to Moscow is maintained, but if any grievances, contradictions arise, or the country finds itself in crisis, some people may “remember” that they are “Ukrainians.” The consequences will depend on the depth of the crisis, but one thing is certain - any crisis will strengthen such dual loyalty.
Even in quiet times, the presence of another political center will be an incentive to compare.
There will always be dissatisfied people who always feel bad at home. That is, on our borders there will be an organizational center of destructive domestic Russian opposition, connected with us by thousands of family ties, and on our territory there will be a couple of million people who served this alternative center, fought for it, lost, but it is not a fact that they have resigned themselves, although outwardly and submitted.
POST WAR UKRAINE
We will not be able to control post-war Ukraine.
The chances of a pro-Russian or even just a moderate government coming to power there will tend to zero.
And it is not a fact that we will be lucky again and in the next hundred years will have the opportunity to solve this problem by military means.
But for any enemy of Russia, Ukraine is a ready, loyal ally for anything, which does not even need to be persuaded to harm Russia.
It must be borne in mind that in peacetime one can harm much more effectively and for much longer than during war.
Ukraine will be the same as it was - a black hole sucking up Russian resources.
Only a more effectively managed black hole, whose elite will be placed under the direct control of the West and will be led not by the idea of selling everything and running away to Switzerland, but by thoughts of revenge.
OPTIONS
We have the following positions:
1. In the next six months to a year, the West is going to withdraw from the Ukrainian war and conclude a compromise peace with Russia on the condition of maintaining a reduced Ukraine.
2. For Russia, preserving Ukraine will mean
preserving the threat against which the Northeast Military District was launched.
The threat will be temporarily pushed back, but not completely eliminated, that is, the main task of the SVO will not be completely resolved.
3. There is no guarantee that it will be possible to repeat the SVO in the foreseeable future to finish off the surviving Ukraine. Most likely, this possibility will be completely blocked politically by the West during peace negotiations (for example, by issuing overlapping guarantees or by admitting Ukraine to NATO).
4. The window of opportunity to destroy the Ukrainian state by military means will be open until the spring of next year.
By that time, the West is going to increase the military capabilities of the Kyiv regime and provide it with active allies in order to confront Russia with the prospect of prolonging the war for years and expanding its scale, thereby forcing it to agree to a compromise peace on the condition “everyone owns what he controls.”
From here we come to a simple conclusion:
politically, Russia needs to try to defeat the Ukrainian army in one operation on the left bank of the Dnieper, which should unfold immediately after the Ukrainian offensive finally runs out of steam.
Subsequent military operations (on the right bank) should be limited to combing the area and suppressing focal resistance and be completed before the onset of spring.
This is the only way to solve the problem of the complete liquidation of Ukraine.
Is the army capable of solving this problem? Apparently, she is capable.
But war is a thousand accidents, so we won’t swear and throw our caps into the air in advance.
One thing is certain:
if this task is not solved for some reason, it will become much more difficult to ensure the fulfillment of the stated goals of the North Military District by military means, and Russia’s political position will worsen.
Understanding all this, the Americans are waiting for our offensive, preparing for it and will try to disrupt it, including through political maneuvering.
So the task facing us is much more difficult than simply finishing off an enemy exhausted by his own unsuccessful “offensive” on the battlefield.
Combat actions here are only one of the necessary mechanisms to achieve the peace we need.
A mechanism, the use of which will be effective only if coordinated in place and time with the action of other (political, information and diplomatic mechanisms).
RELATED Rostislav Ishchenko: who is he - Political scientist
---GOOGLE translation of article into English
BIOGRAPHY Ishchenko Rostislav Vladimirovich, Political Scientist
Ishchenko Rostislav Vladimirovich was born on December 29, 1965 in Kiev.
After school, he served his military service as a private in the Soviet Army in the Strategic Missile Forces in the BSSR.
Graduated with honors from the Faculty of History of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv State University.
Propagandists · Ukrainian and Russian political scientist, diplomat, columnist for MIA "Russia Today" · Пропагандисты · Украинский и российский политолог, дипломат, обозреватель МИА «Россия сегодня» · Український та російський політолог, дипломат, оглядач МІА «Росія сьогодні»
SOURCE:https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q19413936/
speaker - https://valdaiclub.com/about/experts/274/
Valdai Discussion Club Conference Hall address: 16/1 Tsvetnoy Boulevard St., Moscow, Russia, 127051 Phone: +7 (495) 734-72-77 Email: admin@valdaiclub.com
Founded by The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC) is a non-profit academic and diplomatic think tank that was founded by the Russian Federation Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Education and Science in 2010. RIAC activities are aimed at strengthening peace, friendship and solidarity between peoples, preventing international conflicts and promoting conflict resolution and crisis settlement.
#YIKES!!! - Example of U.S. Military speaking on Russian Propaganda Network - Retired US Army Major General Paul Vallely, Chairman of Stand Up America Foundation [video valdaiclub - 2017?], talks about the evolution of US President Donald Trump from businessman to President and the new role of the United States as it disengages from its previous interventionist role in the Middle East. According to Vallely, it will take time for the United States to develop a new comprehensive strategy, in which issues in East Asia and illegal immigration over the Mexican border will play a greater role than the Middle East. He also noted that differences between Russia and the United States regarding Iran are possible to resolve over time.
More articles by Ischenko pro-putin propaganda
2017dec07 Ishchenko (Pro-Putin) Expert warns Kiev will wreck Minsk accords due to feud amongst Ukraine’s elite
The issue of settling the Donbass crisis has been stuck in the mud since the Ukrainian elite completely missed their chances in 2015 and 2016 to put these peace agreements into practice
7 Dec 2017 Source TASS From <https://tass.com/world/979677> Ukraine crisis
MOSCOW, December 7. /TASS/. A deep crisis plaguing the Ukrainian establishment will not let Kiev launch a full-fledged implementation of the Minsk accords, President of the Center for System Analysis and Forecasting Rostislav Ishchenko told a round table at the TASS News Agency on Thursday.
"Let’s be clear that these agreements will never be implemented simply because the moment when Ukraine could have fulfilled them has already passed," the expert noted. "And so, these agreements are an element of a global game, an element of international bargaining with the US, an element that offers the opportunity for them to drag their feet, but not an element of practical implementation," Ischenko explained.
He noted that the issue of settling the Donbass crisis has been stuck in the mud since the Ukrainian elite completely missed their chances in 2015 and 2016 to put these peace agreements into practice.
"Groups within the Ukrainian elite have plunged into a deep standoff among themselves for different reasons, and have been actively working to rattle the authority of [President Pyotr] Poroshenko for a third month running. Even former President of Georgia [Mikhail Saakashvili] pledges to send Pytor Alekseyevich into oblivion before the start of 2018," Ishchenko said.
Tags
From <https://tass.com/world/979677>
2015Mar03 Ishchenko (Pro-Putin) Deescalating the Conflict in Ukraine
23.03.2015
Rostislav Ishchenko | vaidaclub source
Interview with Rostislav Ishchenko, President of the Center for System Analysis and Forecasting.
What could you say about the recent statement by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on the recent de-escalation of the conflict in Donbass? Is this really happening? Will Kiev fully comply with the Minsk agreements? We hear continuous reports that Ukraine is building up its military strength with Western help. Will you, please, comment on the EU and US roles in this respect.
Poroshenko is saying what he is supposed to say, but even he doesn’t seem to believe it. First, Ukraine does not conceal the fact that it will only accept one end to the Donbass problem – the surrender of the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics. However, to achieve this, Kiev must win militarily, which it obviously cannot do no matter how many people it drafts or how much equipment its army receives. It cannot win even with Western supplies, which aren’t expected in the near future anyway. To sum up, Kiev is unable to win but must continue the war because the Kiev regime cannot exist without it. The war is delaying the inevitable socio-economic collapse of the country and justifies the terrorist methods used to run it. This is the only thing allowing the regime to pretend that there is national unity and that the situation in the country is under control.
There can be no doubt that the United States has an interest in the war in Ukraine lasting as long as possible and being as bloody and destructive as possible, but Washington does not want to use its resources on propping up the Kiev regime that has no choice other than to prosecute the war. So, Kiev will be pushed to step up its military activities but won’t be helped (except with kind words).
As for the EU, it is irreparably divided. The United Kingdom, Poland, and the collective Baltic limitrophe take a pro-American, Russophobic position and are going all-out to escalate the confrontation with Russia. Italy, Greece, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and some other states are strong supporters of the EU conducting its own policy independent of Washington and pursuing European rather than US interests. France and Germany are hesitant, but recently they have been increasingly inclined to accept the need for normalizing relations with Russia. True, they are still trying to avoid a quarrel with America, but they will have to make a choice, and there is reason to believe they will choose Russia.
Can elections be held in some territories of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions? How might the assertion of their special status affect the situation in Ukraine? What if some other regions follow the example of the DPR and the LPR?
Elections in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions are unrealistic. As I’ve said, Kiev is not going to comply with the Minsk agreements. In other words, war is becoming inevitable. It is the only way the sides can resolve their irreconcilable contradictions. This is why the Ukrainian authorities will do whatever they can to shift the blame for wrecking the peace process to the DPR, LPR and Russia.
As for other regions of Ukraine (the eight regions of Novorossiya), they have wanted to follow the example of Crimea rather than the DPR and the LPR since March 2014. When regional administration buildings were occupied last March, the Russian tricolor was hoisted above them. Only when it became obvious that Russia wouldn’t intervene militarily did all kinds of “people’s republics” with their own symbols start to emerge. I think they are temporary entities, but that does not mean there should be only two. Kiev has alienated everyone in the past year. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a Lvov or a Ternopol people’s republic. Of course, they would have the opposite ideology of the DPR and the LPR, but Kiev already enjoys no more prestige in Galicia than in Donbass.
Can Kiev make concessions or compromise with southeastern Ukraine?
No, it’s impossible. Admitting that compromise is possible at this point would mean admitting that everything was in vain – the war, the tens of thousands of deaths, the destruction of the national economy and even the 2014 armed coup and the formation of the terrorist Nazi regime. That would only lead to the question of responsibility, which rests with those who are currently in power. But they have made such a mess that life imprisonment and the confiscation of property (if they survive to stand trial) would be a mild punishment. So Kiev will fight to the end – its own rapidly approaching end.
How should Russia react if the Minsk agreements are violated by Kiev or Donbass?
Russia is already reacting. It is citing violations of the agreements by Kiev and urging Paris and Berlin as their guarantors to respond. As for the future, we’ll have to wait and see. When the war resumes, we should play it by ear based on the outcome of the fighting.
What do you predict will happen in Ukraine? What is the most realistic scenario today?
There is nothing good in store for Ukraine. I think during this year it will sustain a military defeat and the disintegration of its army, another coup and the collapse of what is left of its government agencies, all-out chaos, the total destruction of the economy and the start of subsistence farming for survival. The country is in for a humanitarian catastrophe that practically no one is able to avert. The only thing left is to try and mitigate its consequences. But to do this, the territory of modern Ukraine must be occupied by an outside force capable of maintaining police order, or the DPR and the LPR self-defense forces must be powerful enough to occupy the entire territory, defeat Makhnovism and criminal rule and start developing the economy from scratch, of course with foreign support. In other words, without outside support no more than half of Ukraine’s current population will survive after the imminent, final collapse of the state. Survivors will be set back a century in terms of living standards and civilization. This is why foreign intervention to restore law and order to Ukraine after the collapse of Project Ukraine will be inevitable.
From <https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/deescalating_the_conflict_in_ukraine/>
Rostislav Ishchenko: The Ukrainian elite was formed as a Comprador, even worse than a Comprador
11 Feb 2024 | Pravda English Link | Citing Source: https://ukraina.ru
The Ukrainian elites deny the state as a value, they are initially atomized, they initially live in the "every man for himself" mode, and some external force holds them back. That's why they all ran constantly – some to Moscow, some to Washington, some to Brussels, and said, let's be independent, but you will ensure our stability.
About why it is impossible to say for sure about the growth of nationalist sentiments in Kazakhstan, why the Russian Il-76 shot down by the Ukrainian Air Force with Ukrainian prisoners of war on board was "forgotten" in the West and in Ukraine, and what actually happened to the Ukrainian elites.<url> was told by a political scientist and columnist for the publication Ukraine.<url> Rostislav Ishchenko.
– Rostislav Vladimirovich, one of the main news is Tucker Carlson's interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I am interested in the importance of this precedent, because some say that there is too much hype around this story. Is this so, can the arrival of at least one of the Western media people really affect anything, and why did this visit cause such a big stir in the West?
– What do you mean, were there no precedents? Presidents are constantly giving interviews to someone, and foreign journalists are constantly being interviewed. On the eve of visits, interviews are almost mandatory, at least very often.
Recently, due to the fact that the West has taken Russia out of the brackets of the civilized world, Western journalists have not interviewed Russian political figures, and in this sense, of course, interest in Carlson's interview with Putin is out of the general trend, and therefore caused corresponding outrage in the West, the European Union even proposes to introduce Carlson sanctions.
As for the hype here – when some unknown football player arrives, the whole country is on its ears too. After all, Carlson is a person working in the information space, well-known in this space, and even in order to disperse the interview for reading so that there would be more interest in it, the hype around Carlson's personality does not bother anyone.
Why did you come? – I came to take an interview. – Who should I borrow from? – Take it from Putin. – Did you take it? – I took it. – Well, let's read it.
– A question about the situation in Kazakhstan. The President dismissed the Prime Minister and the entire Cabinet. What could have happened, or is this the natural finale of cleaning the system from Nazarbayev's cadres?
– I do not know what could happen in Kazakhstan if the entire Cabinet was dismissed, I do not think that this is a purge of personnel, because there was already a lot of time to purge personnel. If there were any complaints against the government, then, probably, they should have been voiced.
If these are some hidden claims that everyone knows about, but everyone always knows about it in Kazakhstan, and not outside it, so I can't say anything about it, that they were dismissed there, or not.
– What is the current state of relations between Russia and Kazakhstan? There are constantly videos condemning Russians, as they were in Ukraine at one time, so far small, local, but, nevertheless, the trend is such that there are more and more of them.
– Firstly, so far small local videos condemning Russians from Kazakhstan have been running for thirty years. Nationalists have been in power in Kazakhstan since 1991, and Nazarbayev balanced as much as he could, but did not remove or drive them from power. It is quite understandable that Kazakhstan is in exactly the same position as all other post-Soviet states. It is part of the former system.
Russian Russians were also numerous in Kazakhstan, more than Kazakhs, at least as of the late nineties, then their number decreased because many Russians left Kazakhstan, including those who left under pressure.
Nevertheless, there are still a lot of Russians there, in northern Kazakhstan they live locally, in their ancestral territories, and, in my opinion, they still make up the majority there. Therefore, naturally, in Kazakhstan they see Kazakh nationalists as a counterweight to Russian influence.
BELARUS
As for how many or few of these videos there are, I do not know, because we are still hearing the assessment of the Russian public, and the Russian public is like this:
today Lukashenko is going to Europe – all Belarusians are enemies, tomorrow Lukashenko did not have a coup d'etat and he is already friends with Russia – all Belarusians are friends. Yesterday they fought with the Chechens and it was necessary to drop an atomic bomb on them, today the Chechens are fighting for Russia – they are good fellows, heroes, etc.
Public opinion flows very quickly from one to the other, and it is enough to show a couple of some situations of a clash on ethnic grounds in Kazakhstan, where Russians are insulted, and the corresponding public opinion will be formed.
I can say for sure that in the nineties, Russians in Kazakhstan were worse off than they are now, because they fled from there, and fled under pressure, and fled quite massively – there were many of them coming to Russia. Russia did not react to this in any way, Kazakhstan was a friend, a brother, and everything was fine with him.
There are no Russians fleeing Kazakhstan now. There are Russians who oppose Kazakh nationalism in Kazakhstan, there are Kazakhs who oppose Kazakh nationalism – this is natural, not all Kazakhs are nationalists.
There are certain videos, in the nineties there were no smartphones for everyone to film everything that happens around them – now they are, so the number of videos on social networks has increased. In the nineties, there were no social networks themselves. Therefore, there is more attention to these videos.
In order to assess whether there are more videos, the situation in Kazakhstan is worse, whether it is better – for this you need to have clear statistics. No one has it.
In Kazakhstan, they say that everything is fine with them, especially the Kazakhs. Russians living in Kazakhstan say that everything is fine and everything is fine, others say that everything is terrible.
They don't go there from Russia at all. We can assess, for example, some actions, the interests of the Kazakh government, but it is impossible to assess the living situation while in Moscow, St. Petersburg or Vladivostok - you need to feel with your hands and see.
UKRAINE comparison Kazakhsan
Moreover, even in Ukraine at one time, people could live in the same city and assess the situation in the country in completely different ways. The same thing happens there.
Therefore, it is still impossible to talk about the growth or decrease of nationalist sentiments. Kazakhstan's policy has not changed in all this time. Kazakhstan has always maintained a balance in politics, it tried to balance its economic interests in Russia somewhat with its political friendship with Great Britain and the United States, they received oil and gas concessions on its territory. That is, he tried to balance Russia economically, but, nevertheless, he was always in the wake of Russian rather than American politics.
Kazakhstan was actually the locomotive of the creation of the EurAsEC, if it were not for Kazakhstan, then there would be no one to create the EurAsEC with. Ukraine fell off immediately, even from the Customs Union, Belarus was already in a single state, which is unclear where the one is, where the state is, and where the two states are.
Kazakhstan actually turned out to be the third member, thanks to which integration in the post-Soviet space actually continued, and even expanded. But even now he is not going to leave these systems, he works with Russia, helps to overcome sanctions somewhere, earns money from this, just as Belarus earned from shrimps and all other seafood and other Belarusian goods.
Somewhere his economic interests with Russia diverge, somewhere Kazakhstan is under pressure and he bends under pressure, because it is also clear - his shirt is closer to his body, it is necessary to protect his interests.
I cannot say that we have super-bad relations with Kazakhstan, it is impossible to compare it with Ukraine, because in Ukraine the state government initially, since the nineties, set the task of "away from Russia".
"Get rid of Russia" has been the slogan of state power for thirty years. I do not hear such things in Kazakhstan that the state authorities, not individual numerous nationalists, namely, that the state authorities speak with such slogans. Kazakhstan does not train the army in the war with Russia, and the army was based on this in Ukraine.
From the very first days of the creation of an independent Ukrainian state, Major General Mulyava, who immediately jumped from sergeant to general, was appointed head of some ideological direction in the Ministry of Defense, which is already missing, disappeared along with Mulyava, and all officers who expressed a desire to serve in Ukraine passed through him, and asked everyone one question: "Are you ready to fight with Russia"?
Neither with Belarus, nor with Romania, nor with Poland, these are also border countries, nor with Moldova. Belarus and Moldova are also former Soviet states. Namely, with Russia. The Ukrainian army was built on this.
The Kazakh army conducts joint exercises with Russia, Kazakhstan and Russia together in the CSTO. Yes, this organization is quite amorphous, but not everyone in NATO is going to defend the Baltic States either.
Therefore, Russia is not following the path of signing military alliances now, it turns out that at the end of the twentieth and in the twenty-first century military alliances, the document on military alliance is not binding. The country decides for itself. It was the same before.
The country decides for itself whether to fulfill its obligations under this document or not. It proceeds at the time of the crisis from the status quo. Therefore, we do not have a formal document with China, and the military alliance is much more durable than with the CSTO, although we say that we do not have a military alliance – there is no document, we did not sign anything, we are just friends at home and sometimes conduct joint exercises.
Kaza different people immediately began to fight all against all at the same time. The only thing that stabilized them was: "we focus on Moscow, so we go to Moscow, fall at our feet, and say: Sovereign, appoint us a hetman, tell us who is dearer to your heart, and we will obey him, we will not love him, we will hate him with fierce hatred, we will sit up to him We will run to you, tell you how he is cheating on you, but please appoint a hetman so that we know that he is in charge until you change mercy to anger."
And another crowd came to Washington in the same way, and said:
"Look how beautiful and democratic I am, how I love America, how I love the West, let me govern Ukraine, or I will represent that part of Ukraine that is oriented towards Western values, let me be the most important there. Take it and tell us – we appreciate this one the most, he is the best you have."
That's how Yushchenko is the greatest banker of our time, the most, the most, he was like that exactly as long as the Americans needed him, so everyone forgot about his greatness, not a single bank invited this magnitude to work for him. I would have taken a Swiss or American bank and invited the best banker of our time. They don't invite you.
They also mark others. Yatsenyuk was also the greatest democrat of our time, Poroshenko was someone, I don't remember anymore. Each of them at the moment of his rise – the West hung a mark on him:
"This is our favorite politician, we need to focus on him."
They still run to them like that.
They did not abandon Russia, they either reformatted or threw away everything that was pro-Russian, now politicians who focus on Russia, on which they dream of restoring Ukraine, they live in Moscow, it is even more convenient for them to go to the Kremlin.
True, they are not always allowed there, but they can get closer – you can come up, knock on the gate, ask: "Is it possible today or not"? And with the same thing:
"Let's occupy Ukraine, give it to us, appoint me hetman, I will govern, I will be good."
Only those who focused on the United States remained in Ukraine, and the United States says:
"And we are not going to appoint anyone anymore, let them flounder as they want."
That's it, freedom! Now everyone, to the best of their abilities and abilities, can make their way to the Hetmans themselves – a continuous Wild field.
Maybe they would like to have someone appointed to them, but no one wants to appoint them. And they themselves cannot agree with each other, because everyone is fighting for themselves.
Source: https://ukraina.ru
From <https://pravda-en.com/usa/2024/02/11/314023.html>
#Compilation | Examples of ELIMINATIONIST LANGUAGE against Ukrainians
by Russian Officials
Intention to Commit Crime | GENOCIDAL RHETORIC | Examples
Source: Just Security with mark-ups by TULPPP
Russian Rhetoric of Genocide
Russia’s Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection Updated With the Latest, JustSecurity
Markups & Highlights by TULPPP
source: Russia's Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection | JustSecurity [link to original article] published -
February 14, 2023 by Clara Apt [regularly updated]
filed under | genocide, Rhetoric, Russia-Ukraine War, Translation Available, Vladimir Putin, War Crimes
(Editor’s note: This article, originally published on June 6 and updated previously, is now updated to add new instances of eliminationist rhetoric by State Duma members Boris Chernyshov and Vyacheslav Molotov, Deputy Dean of world politics at Moscow State University, Director of the Institute of Contemporary Studies at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Oleg Karpovich, political scientist Rostislav Ishchenko, war correspondent Dmitry Steshin, and more. New material is noted in red as “New” or “Updated.” Ця стаття також доступна українською тут.)
Long before Russian President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale assault on Ukraine in February and even prior to his 2014 invasion and capture of Crimea, analysts noted with alarm a different kind of escalation – the threatening rhetoric against Ukraine by Putin and actors within his control. Dating at least to 2008 or 2009, increasingly hostile language laid the groundwork for rejecting Ukraine’s existence as a state, a national group, and a culture.
What follows is a compilation of publicly available statements (readers are invited to submit by email any that we may have missed).
Experts such as Francine Hirsch, a professor of history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and author of “Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg,” have pointed to such language as evidence of genocidal intent toward the Ukrainian people. Whether and how the concept of “genocide” applies to Russia’s campaign against Ukraine is the subject of debate, notwithstanding the reference in Article II of the Genocide Convention to “the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such.” A related issue under discussion is a concept often referred to as “cultural genocide,” which generally connotes the intentional destruction of a group’s identity even in the absence of mass killings. “These calls for ‘de-Ukrainization’ are an incitement to genocide: to ‘destroy, in whole or in part,’ the Ukrainian nation,” Hirsch wrote in April. And Yale University history professor Timothy Snyder, in reference to the same article in the Russian outlet RIA Novosti that prompted Hirsch’s conclusion, wrote, “Russia has just issued a genocide handbook for its war on Ukraine.”
Beth Van Schaack, U.S. ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice, said in a May 2022 hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in response to a question about the Russian atrocities coming to light in Ukraine, “Some of the genocidal rhetoric that we’re hearing out of Russia is extremely worrying.”
A report from the New Lines Institute and the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights concludes that “Russia bears State responsibility for breaches of Article II and Article III (c) of the Genocide Convention,” and “that that there exists undoubtedly a very serious risk of genocide, triggering States’ duty to prevent under Article I of the Genocide Convention.” Among the evidence the report cites is a range of statements that it says constitute “direct and public incitement to commit genocide,” including denying the existence of a Ukrainian identity; accusing Ukraine, contrary to evidence, of committing the very kinds of atrocities that Russia is or envisions committing; and dehumanizing rhetoric.
While analysis of Putin and Russian rhetoric has been extensive, it can make for a fragmented picture of the trend, with selections from relevant passages scattered across articles, social media, books, audio, and video. The following compilation seeks to collect examples of these statements in one place. They are organized in chronological order and necessarily non-exhaustive, since such declarations occur at high frequency in various media controlled by the Russian government, as expert monitors of Russian media such as Julia Davis and Francis Scarr have found.
The statements range from formal presidential addresses and articles by Putin and other officials to commentary on Russian state television and on social media. Sources include (but are not limited to) news articles; books; the Kremlin’s online repository of speeches and addresses; Russian state-controlled news agencies, including RIA Novosti and Kommersant; and posts on Twitter and Telegram.
This compilation, in chronological order, focuses on key words, phrases, and/or themes that appear to express intent on the part of the Russian government to eliminate Ukraine or Ukrainians as a nation-state, people, or culture. Recurring concepts include the notion of historical Russian and Ukrainian unity, denial of the Ukrainian nation, and the conceptualization of “Ukrainianism” as a fascist threat to Russian sovereignty. As the war progresses, it is vital to track these statements of intent for use by analysts, diplomats, policymakers, prosecutors, and more.
With thanks to Maksym Vishcyhk for contributing updates for this list.
(Readers may also be interested in Compilation of Countries’ Statements Calling Russian Actions in Ukraine “Genocide”by Elizabeth Whatcott.)
Collected Eliminationist Rhetoric by Putin and Associates
Russian President Vladimir Putin in reported comment to U.S. President George W. Bush – The NATO bloc broke up into blocking packages – Kommersant (April 7, 2008)
“You don’t understand, George, that Ukraine is not even a state. What is Ukraine? Part of its territories is Eastern Europe, but the greater part is a gift from us.” (Reported based on anonymous source as a Putin comment to Bush during the NATO Summit in Bucharest, Romania; reported in English on May 25, 2009, in Time Magazine. Neither that nor subsequent references identified to date indicated any effort to corroborate, and some analysts cast doubt on whether Putin made the comment. Some references translated “state” as “country,” which would be a more likely meaning, as in a sovereign State.)
Putin – “Putin to the West: Hands off Ukraine” – Time Magazine (May 25, 2009)
Relations between “Big Russia and Little Russia — Ukraine…have always been the business of Russia itself.”
Putin – “Russia: The Ethnicity Issue” – Nezavisimaya Gazeta (January 23, 2012), (alternative translation by Russian site Top War)
Russia, with its diverse set of languages, traditions, and cultures, has an “ethnicity issue” that is “without any doubt a fundamental one.”
Multiculturalism “denies integration through assimilation” whilst making the “‘minorities right to be distinct’ absolute.” However, it “does little to balance this with public, behavioral or cultural commitments to the population and society as a whole.”
Russia is a “type of state civilization where there are no ethnicities, but where ‘belonging’ is determined by a common culture and shared values.” This common culture is reliant upon “preserving the dominance of Russian culture,” which “hostile forces” have tried to break.
Analysis:
Russia’s unity is reliant upon “the absorption by the leader – first his ideas and then presumably in his acts – of all of these other groups. I was about to say national minorities, but that would have been wrong because, in Putin’s mind, and in [Ivan] Ilyn’s mind for that matter, there are no national minorities. Ilyn [a Russian fascist philosopher and source of ideological inspiration for Putin] was very clear that anyone who uses the phrase ‘national minority’ is attacking Russia.” – Snyder
“Subtle cultural therapy” is recommended for Russia, a “a country where, for many, the civil war never really ended and where the past is highly politicized.”
The organization of regional parties is a “direct path to separatism.” Those who “attempt to lean towards nationalist, separatist, or other similar forces or influences should be restricted from the electoral process through democratic or court procedures.”
Russia and Ukraine have “lived together for many centuries. Together [they] were victorious in the most terrible of wars. And [they] will continue to exist side by side. To those who want and try to divide [Russia and Ukraine], I say – in your dreams.”
Analysis:
When Putin discusses Ukrainians in this vision, “he doesn’t mention the existence of the Ukrainian state; that’s irrelevant. All he mentions is that Ukrainians are a kind of fragment scattered across this broad expanse… This fragment will only be made whole insofar and as it is absorbed into this larger Russian civilization.” Putin also elaborates upon this notion of Russia as a whole civilization in a fascist manner. The “contours, the limits of that civilization are defined by the leader himself.” And, If Russia is divided, “it is the fault of others, who must be threatened and deterred.” – Snyder
Putin – “Address by President of the Russian Federation” – Kremlin website (March 18, 2014)
Crimea is “an inseparable part of Russia” that reflects Russia and the region’s “shared history and pride.”“When Crimea ended up as part of a different country,” Russia realized that “it was not simply robbed, it was plundered.”
Russians had been deprived of their “historical memory, even of their language and to subject them to forced assimilation.”
Ukraine has “no legitimate executive authority now, nobody to talk to. Many government agencies have been taken over by the imposters, but they do not have any control in the country,” and they themselves are “often controlled by radicals.”
Then-Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev quoted in a conversation with an industry watchdog official – “Russian Prime Minister: Ukraine Has ‘No Industry, or State” (April 5, 2016)
There is “neither industry, nor a state there” in Ukraine. In 2013, there was “industry there, but there was no state even then.”
Russian economist and pundit Mikhail Khazin remarks – “They need to be partially eliminated” – YouTube video (December 27, 2016)
Ukraine has “several million people [not loyal to Russia]” who “need to be partially eliminated and partially squeezed out.”
“New Russia,” or the territories from Kharkov, Odessa, Zaporozhye, and Dnepropetrovsk, “should be joined to the Russian regions, with full denazification, deukrainization.”
Russia should institute a “complete ban on Ukrainian fonts, Ukrainian texts, programs on [the] Ukrainian language, on teaching Ukrainian – ie completely.”
These implementations will cause a “surplus population – let the surplus population go to the [Russian] Far East.”
Former Putin aide Vladislav Surkov in Q&A – Surkov: “I’m Interested in Acting Against Reality” – Actual Comments website (February 26, 2020)
Surkov’s “vanity is forever satisfied by the fact that [he] put [his] hand and head into the building of a new Russian state.”
There is “no Ukraine,” although there is “Ukrainianism” – a “specific mental disorder. Surprisingly brought to the extreme degree passion for ethnography. Such bloody lore. Muddle instead of the state. There is borscht, Bandera, bandura. But there is no nation.”
Donbass “does not deserve such humiliation” of returning to Ukraine. Ukraine “does not deserve such honor.”
Putin – “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” – Kremlin (July 12, 2021)
The incorporation of “western Russian lands into the single state” was the product of “common faith, shared cultural traditions, and – I would like to emphasize it once again – language similarity.”There is “no historical basis” for the “idea of Ukrainian people as a nation separate from the Russians.”
Ukrainization was “often imposed on those who did not see themselves as Ukrainians.”
Modern Ukraine is “entirely the product of the Soviet era” shaped on the “lands of historical Russia.” Hence, Russia “was robbed.”
Ukraine’s leaders “began to mythologize and rewrite history, edit out everything that united [Russia and Ukraine], and refer to the period when Ukraine was part of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union as an occupation.”
The “slogans, ideology, and blatant aggressive Russophobia” of “radical nationalist groups” have become “defining elements of state policy in Ukraine.”
Ukraine “peddle[s] Russophobia” and prefers to “exploit the image of the ‘victim of external aggression.’”
Russia and Ukraine together have “always been and will be many times stronger and more successful. For [they] are one people.“
Medvedev op-ed – “Why Contacts with the Current Ukrainian Leadership are Meaningless” – Kommersant (October 11, 2021)
Ukrainian leaders are “people who do not have any stable self-identification. Who are they, what country are they citizens of, what is their historical identity, ethnic component, what gods do they pray to?”
There are “no fools to fight for Ukraine. And it is pointless for [Russia] to deal with vassals. Business must be done with the suzerain.”
Putin in press conference (February 8, 2022) and in official remarks (February 21, 2022) – An Independent Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation’s Breaches of the Genocide Convention in Ukraine and the Duty to Prevent – Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy
“‘Like it or not, take it, my beauty’” references a “vulgar Russian rhyme about necrophiliac rape, implying an intention to inflict similar destruction on Ukraine and a view of Ukraine as a corpse.”
Modern Ukraine is considered to be “entirely created by Russia or, to be more precise, by Bolshevik, Communist Russia.”
Russia is “ready to show what real decommunization would mean for Ukraine.”
UPDATED Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov – Telegram posts by Kadyrov – Telegram (Feb. 21 – Nov. 26, 2022)
“All of today’s Ukraine at one time did not even dream of those territories that were given to it with one stroke of the pen by the Bolsheviks. Without those broad reckless gestures, she, as a country, would not have represented anything from the beginning… Sooner or later everything returns to its native freedom. So it was with the Crimea. Donetsk and Luhansk did not take root either. I think this is not the limit.” (Feb. 21)
“Chechen fighters take an active part in a special operation to cleanse Ukraine from Bandera, nationalists and terrorists.” (March 8)
“Very soon, these brave [Russian] warriors will erase this vile, vile phenomenon called “nationalism” from the pages of Ukrainian history.” (March 19)
“I do not envy the fate of the Bandera dogs, because their sad fate is already a foregone conclusion by our valiant warriors. My dear brothers… intend to excise this hated Nazi tumor. Very soon, the hands of Chechen fighters will bring final peace and order throughout Ukraine. They intend to personally behead all the shaitans hiding behind thick walls, or, what is even more vile for civilians.” (using the Islamic term “shaitans for devils, or Satan. March 24)
“The Kyiv authorities have chosen a path doomed to death. Having once chosen the side of outright Western criminals, the entire Ukronazi trash forever crossed out the possibility of peaceful coexistence in a religious and civilized society.” (March 24)
“The Nazis once again demonstrate their true essence, the essence of rodent pests.” (April 2)
Russian forces “are conducting cleansing operations from the surviving Bandera rabble, Nazis and shaitans.” (April 13)
“With such motivation and fighting spirit, we simply do not have the right to leave a single nationalist and Banderist on Ukraine soil.” (April 26)
For eight years, Donbass “was oppressed by non-humans from gangs of Ukraine.” (May 19)
“I am convinced that Russian President Vladimir Putin made the only right decision, ordering to destroy the American chimera in its very embryo in Ukraine.” (June 26)
“This is exactly how the purge of the entire Luhansk People’s Republic took place – competently, quickly and accurately.” (July 10)
“Europeans, Ukrainians, wake up! Save your gene pool, not Zelensky’s status.” (July 24)
“It cost us a lot of effort to squeeze out of our lands this abomination that has bred at the suggestion of the same West.” (August 3)
“Now, even if one bullet flies towards Russia, it is necessary not only to hit the decision-making centers, but to wipe them off the face of the earth so that there is no wet place left from this fascist-Bandera junta. I think so – the fish rots from the head, so you have to start from the top.” (Oct. 19)
“We will do our best to ensure that these dogs of hell get what they deserve, and those who somehow managed to escape punishment are doomed to live the rest of their miserable life, turning around anxiously. They don’t deserve any rights or accepted norms.” (Nov. 19)
“The result of the special operation for us is thecomplete destruction of the manifestations of Satanism: shaitans, Bandera, Nazis. There are many definitions for them, but the essence is always the same. Their true essence is the lack of humanity, moral principles, the spread of evil spirits. Therefore, for us they are Satanists.” (Nov. 26)
Putin declaring Russia’s full-scale assault on Ukraine – “Putin Orders ‘Special Military Operation’ for Ukraine” – Bloomberg News (February 24, 2022)
The special military operation’s goal is “the protection of people who during eight years, suffer from abuse and genocide from the Kyiv regime.”
Whoever tries to stop Russia and “further create threats to [Russia’s] country, to [the Russian] people, should know that Russia’s response will be immediate and lead [them] to such consequences that [they] have never faced in [their] history.“
UPDATED Head of the Duma Committee on International Affairs Leonid Slutsky – Telegram posts by Slutsky – Telegram (Feb. 24, 2022 – Jan. 23, 2023)
“Considering that Washington and Brussels have rejected Russian proposals on global security issues, and Kiev has been refusing to implement the Minsk agreements for 8 years, the demilitarization of Ukraine is the only way left… [Russia and Ukraine] is one people. Think about [their] shared history. [They] have common victories. One culture, one faith.” (Feb. 24, 2022)
“Today in Ukraine there is not only a special operation of the RF Armed Forces for liberation from neo-Nazism. In fact, this is the culmination of a fierce civilizational battle unleashed not by us. But the price of victory in it now is salvation from the destruction of the entire Russian world.” (May 7, 2022)
“All of this once again demonstrates that Russia’s special operation in Ukraine must be brought to an end. This is a question of the survival of the Russian world and Russian civilization.” (July 17, 2022)
“The decision to conduct the SVO was the only correct one. Russia is saving the Donbass from the genocide and terror of the Nazi regime, which is far from being controlled in Kyiv… Holding referendums on joining Russia in the LPR and DPR, as well as in the liberated territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, all subsequent steps (we have no doubt what they will be), the decree on partial mobilization is the way to preserve our common fatherland.” (Sept. 21, 2022)
“This is the harsh truth. Until the last Ukrainian, so until the last Ukrainian.” (Sept. 30)
“These are the non-humans that the Ukrainian Maidan spawned. Religion in Ukraine is replaced by them with false faith and sectarianism, and the junta itself is first replaced by them.” (Dec. 12, 2022)
“The fate of the Zelensky junta, no matter how Western magazines give him the title of man of the year, is no more enviable than the fate of ordinary traitors. The sale of national interests and the extermination of their people in the war of the West against Russia to the ‘last Ukrainian’ may very well end up with a ‘Not Found’ answer to a search query about Ukraine in the future.” (Dec. 26, 2022)
“The Kyiv regime finally seems to have lost the last remnants of sanity. But what is wrong with European capitals? Are you ready to be erased too?” (Jan. 23, 2023)
Russian victory declaration, accidentally published – “The Offensive of Russia and the New World” – RIA Novosti (February 26, 2022, since deleted)
“There will be no more Ukraine as anti-Russia.”
Vladimir Putin has asserted a “historic responsibility by deciding not to leave the solution of the Ukrainian question to future generations.”
Ukraine’s return to Russia will not mean its statehood’s “liquidation”; instead, Ukraine will be “reorganized, re-established and returned to its natural state of part of the Russian world.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP:
This victory declaration “made it clear that Russia’s aim in this war was to destroy the Ukrainian state, destroy the Ukrainian nation, and then leave the remaining populace as a kind of unformed mass that could be colonized in any way the Russian leadership desired.” – Snyder
This war is a “response to the geopolitical expansion of the Atlanticists, this is Russia’s return of its historical space and its place in the world.”
Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin – Telegram posts by Volodin – Telegram (March 15 – Oct. 13, 2022)
“In the end, everyone should come to the realization that we have one country, and we are obliged to defend it. And there shouldn’t be another!” (March 15)
“Ukraine has lost its sovereignty and is on the verge of self-disintegration.” (July 21)
“If the attacks by the Kyiv regime continue, the response will be even tougher. All organizers and perpetrators of terrorist attacks must be found. Those who resist are destroyed.” (Oct. 13)
...continued
Dmitry Medvedev
– Telegram posts by Medvedev – Telegram (March 17, 2022 – Feb. 3, 2023)
Russia fights for a “world order” in which there is “no place for frostbitten Nazis, historical lies and genocide [against the Russian people].” (March 17, 2022)
Negotiations with Ukraine aim to “fix the neutral status of Ukraine, its demilitarization, the rejection of the use of Nazi ideological laws that were adopted in this country. Well, and a number of positions that the Russian Federation considers to be most important.” (March 26, 2022)
“Deep Ukrainianism” is a fictional concept “fueled by anti-Russian poison and an all-consuming lie about its identity, is one big fake. This phenomenon has never happened in history. And it doesn’t exist now.” (April 5, 2022)
Ukraine will “suffer its own fate” after having “mentally transformed into the Third Reich, having written down the names of Jews and Nazi henchmen into history books. This is its path, of such Ukraine.” (April 5, 2022)
Russia’s “most important goal” is to “change the bloody and full of false myths consciousness of a part of today’s Ukrainians.” (April 5, 2022)
“History will put everything in its place and show which side the truth is on. Who became the custodian of true Christian values, protecting them from atheists, bandits, and nationalists.” (April 27, 2022)
“Zelensky has no other way to stay in office. If, of course, the position itself remains.” (May 3, 2022)
“I am often asked why my Telegram posts are so harsh. The answer is I hate them. They are bastards and geeks. They want death for us, Russia. And as long as I’m alive, I will do everything to make them disappear.” (June 7, 2022)
“I saw a message that Ukraine, under Lend-Lease, wants to receive SPG-9 from its overseas owners with payment for delivery in 2 years. Otherwise, next winter it will simply freeze. Just a question. And who said that in two years Ukraine will even exist on the world map?” (June 15, 2022)
Putin’s special military operation aims to “protect the citizens of Donbass and to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine. Everything is clear here, and they will be achieved.” (July 9, 2022)
“As a result of Western involvement, “Ukraine may lose the remnants of state sovereignty and disappear from the world map” and “Ukrainian criminals will definitely be tried for the atrocities committed against the people of Ukraine and Russia (July 21, 2022)
“The Ukrainian state in its current configuration with the Nazi political regime will pose a constant, direct and clear threat to Russia. Therefore, in addition to protecting our people and protecting the borders of the country, the goal of our future actions, in my opinion, should be the complete dismantling of the political regime of Ukraine.” (Oct. 10, 2022)
“Here,various cockroaches that have bred in the Kiev insectarium constantly threaten to ‘return the Crimea.’ Well, the goals are clear: to cheer up the tame insects around and show the owner of the insectarium that they are still very capable of running cockroaches for a piece of food. Almost like a cockroach – favorite Janissaries in the play of the famous Kyivian Mikhail Bulgakov ‘Running.’ Therefore, I want to remind them of indisputable facts:
“Kiev is the capital of Ancient Russia.
“Kyiv is a large Little Russian city within the Russian Empire.
“Kyiv is the republican capital of the USSR.
“And finally, Kyiv is just a Russian city where people always thought and spoke Russian. To make everything very clear what and how to return…” (Nov. 20, 2022)
“Pseudo-Ukrainian rabid mongrels with Russian surnames, choking on their toxic saliva, declare that their enemy is located within the borders of Russia, from the West to Vladivostok. Rabies has no cure.” (Dec. 11, 2022)
“The termination of life, or death, of the former state will be accompanied by insane laughter, indecent antics and vile clown antics of the Nazi gang, completely crazy from the abundance of blood and drugs. And the deathly silence of Western doctors, looking with cold contempt at the agony of their own tortured patient…” (Feb. 3, 2023)
Russian head of occupation authority in Crimea Sergey Aksyonov –
Telegram posts by Aksyonov – Telegram (March 29, 2022 – Jan. 26, 2023)
“Everything that is connected with the common history, culture, spirituality of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples, acts on the demon-possessed Bandera people like incense on devils. Our army liberates the Ukrainian land from evil spirits. The idol of Bandera will be destroyed, and the world will become cleaner and freer.” (March 29, 2022)“Does anyone still have doubts that Russia is freeing the Ukrainian people from absolute evil? It was grown in the ideological laboratories of Western intelligence services, pumped up with hatred and armed to the teeth, its goal is the destruction of our common values, everything that is dear to us. Therefore, only demilitarization, denazification and the trial of Nazi criminals. Therefore – only victory!” (March 30, 2022)
“It is necessary to destroy the Nazi reptile in its Kiev nest. We must go to the end. Like in `45.” (April 14, 2022)
“We understand that in the person of this regime we are dealing not only with an anti-Russian, but also with an anti-Christian force. In other words, with Satanists. Nazism, paganism, the occult and Satanism have always gone hand in hand – this was the case in the Third Reich, this is happening today in Ukraine… After liberation, Ukraine will need not only denazification, but also serious spiritual ‘treatment.’ Not only a new Nuremberg, but also, figuratively speaking, baptism in the waters of the Dnieper.” (April 18, 2022)
“Those war criminals who survive the process of demilitarization and denazification must be tried and executed publicly. How our grandfathers and great-grandfathers executed the Bandera bastard.” (April 22, 2022)
The “Ukrainian Nazis” face two outcomes: “crawling on their knees into captivity and then under the tribunal or into hell. There are no other scenarios for them and cannot be.” (April 26, 2022)
“The Ukrainian government is confidently leading the country along the path of Nazi Germany, to spiritual, cultural and political suicide. Russian classics, which make up a significant part of world culture, are being sacrificed to bestial Russophobia. The nature of this hatred is understandable: the very existence of the Russian world and everything connected with it is death for Ukrainian Nazism, the virus of which was grown in Western ideological laboratories and artificially brought to the historical lands of Russia … I am sure that after the defeat of Nazism, Russian classics will return to Ukrainian soil. This will become an important tool for denazification of the country. Russian culture and Nazism are incompatible.” (April 27, 2022)
Those captured Nazis who will not be shot by the verdict of the tribunal should be sent to the most black and hard work to restore the cities of Donbass they destroyed. There will be places for them in the Crimean colony. Here they will find a ‘warm’ welcome, lessons in the Russian language and anti-fascism, which they will remember for the rest of their lives.” (May 20, 2022)
“It is difficult to argue with the obvious fact that Ukraine has adopted the methods of ISIS (the organization is banned in the Russian federation)… [Russia] will give a worthy and fair response to the terrorist state of Ukraine, will protect its people and fraternal peoples.” (June 29, 2022)
“Ukraine has already committed so many terrorist attacks, so many crimes against humanity that it has lost all right to its statehood. Ukrainian statehood has become an idol to which bloody sacrifices are constantly made. This idol must be destroyed. The sooner Ukraine in its current form disappears from the political map of the world, the better it will be for the peoples of this country, which the Kyiv regime mercilessly throws into the meat grinder of war, and for the entire world community, for which the Ukrainian state has become a source of endless problems and tension.” (July 12, 2022)
The Ukrainian regime “is not just Nazi and anti-Russian, it is anti-human. Ukrainian statehood is Moloch [a pagan deity], to whom children are sacrificed. This filthy idol must be destroyed, it has no place in history.” (July 27, 2022)
“The forces that seized the Mother of Russian cities and other lands of historical Russia are anti-Russian, anti-Christian, anti-human.” (July 28, 2022)
“The Russian world is returning to its natural borders. I am sure that this process will continue. Our glorious ancestors for centuries mastered, developed and defended these lands not for the bastards who do not remember their relationship, the followers of the sect of Nazis and traitors, to ‘panow’ on them.” (Aug. 8, 2022)
“The future of Ukraine, or rather what remains of it, is possible only with the complete elimination of Ukrainian statehood. We must work to ensure that a new enemy does not grow up near us, in a more serious guise.” (Sept. 1, 2022)
“Unfortunately, the ideology of state terrorism is shared by at least part of Ukrainian society. This is evidenced by the outbursts of demonic joy on the Internet about every terrorist attack staged by the Kyiv regime. This is a disease of public consciousness, which will also have to be treated during the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine. Everyone should know that the end of terrorists is always the same – dog death and eternal damnation. So it was, is and will be.” (Sept. 3, 2022)
“Ukraine is a terrorist state. There can only be one end for terrorists. Proven by history.” (Sept. 16, 2022)
“It is not the Russian language that will disappear, but Ukraine.” (Oct. 21, 2022)
“Now it’s our turn to burn out the Nazi plague with a red-hot iron. And the best guarantee that it will never again crawl out of its rotten catches and will not again strike minds and souls is the liquidation of Ukrainian statehood, which gave birth to Nazism. This will be a new day of liberation for the millions of people who today are held hostage by a terrorist state.”(Oct. 28, 2022)
“Those who occupy Odessa and other Russian cities are of no historical value. The Empress will definitely return to her rightful place, and Bandera’s garbage will be thrown to the dustbin of history.” (Nov. 8, 2022)
“Perhaps the West believes that [Hitler] managed to breed a special ‘breed’ of the Nazis, intended exclusively for ‘hunting’ for Russia and Russians – as breeds of dogs are bred. No one remembers that in fact one of the main ‘generic signs’ of the failed Ukrainian statehood in the nineteenth-twentieth, and in the forties of the last century was anti-Semitism… Only the elimination of the Kyiv junta and the dismantling of Ukrainian statehood, impregnated with Nazism, are a reliable guarantee of peace and security for all peoples.” (Nov. 8/9, 2022)
“We are fed up with ‘square’ disgusting to the throat. And no amount of weapons will help the Kyiv regime to once again get into the Crimea with its snout and put its pig’s hooves on our table. There can be only one result of such attempts: the loss of new territories by the former Ukraine in addition to those already lost and the appearance of thousands of new graves in Ukrainian cemeteries. (Jan. 19, 2023)
“Thefailed Ukrainian statehood is based not only on the ideological code of Russophobia, which the West uses today, but also on the code of anti-Semitism.” (Jan. 26/27, 2023)
Pro-Putin pundit Timofei Sergeitsev op-ed – “What Should Russia Do with Ukraine?” – RIA Novosti (April 5, 2022) (alternative translation by Mariia Kravchenko on Medium)
“Nazi, Bandera Ukraine, the enemy of Russia and the West’s tool for the destuction of Russia, we do not need.”
The “denazification” of Ukraine entails “a set of measures in relation to the nazified mass of the population, which technically cannot be subjected to direct punishment as war criminals.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP:
Denazification in “official Russian usage just means the destruction of the Ukrainian state and nation. A ‘Nazi,’ as [Sergeitsev’s article] explains, is simply a human being who self-identifies as Ukrainian. According to [him], the establishment of a Ukrainian state thirty years ago was the ‘nazification of Ukraine.’ Indeed ‘any attempt to build such state’ has to be a ‘Nazi’ act.” – Snyder
There is “no significant distinction between the APU [Armed Forces of Ukraine] and the so-called national battalions, as well as the territorial defense that joined these two types of military formations. All of them are equally involved in extreme cruelty against the civilian population, equally guilty of the genocide of the Russian people, do not comply with the laws and customs of war. War criminals and active Nazis should be exemplarily and exponentially punished.”
In addition to Ukrainian defense forces, “a significant part of the masses, which are passive Nazis, accomplices of Nazism, are also guilty. They supported and indulged Nazi power.”
These masses can be denazified through “re-education, which is achieved by ideological repression (suppression) of Nazi attitudes and strict censorship: not only in the political sphere, bit also necessarily in the sphere of culture and education.”
“The terms of denazification can in no way be less than one generation, which must be born, grow up and reach maturity under the conditions of denazification.”
Denazification will coincide with “de-Ukrainization – a rejection of the large-scale artificial inflation of the ethnic component of self-identification of the population of the territories of historical Little Russia and New Russia, begun by the Soviet authorities.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP:
“As a historian of mass killing, I am hard pressed to think of many examples where states explicitly advertise the genocidal character of their own actions right at the moment those actions become public knowledge. From a legal perspective, the existence of sucha text (in the larger context of similar statements and Vladimir Putin’s repeated denial that Ukraine exists) makes the charge of genocide far easier to make. Legally, genocide means both actions that destroy a group in whole or in part, combined with some intention to do so. Russia has done the deed and confessed to the intention.” – Snyder
Analysis comments by TULPPP:
History reveals that we “should take dictators at their word. Those who incite genocide usually attempt to follow through. It is not unusual for them to publicize their campaigns through propagandists and media. Adolf Hitler had Joseph Goebbels, Alfred Rosenberg and others doing this work. Putin has Medvedev and the pundits of Russian state media. Finally, the more that Russian soldiers embrace the campaign of ‘de-Ukrainization,’ the more brutal the war will become – and the harder it will be for Russia to find an exit short of total victory or defeat. Russian society’s complacency becomes complicity in murder.” – Hirsch
Ukraine is historically “impossible as a nation state, and attempts to ‘build’ one naturally lead to Nazism. Ukrainism is an artificial anti-Russian construction that does not have its own civilizational content, a subordinate element of an alien and alien civilization.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP:
This article is different from other Russian news sources for “two critical reasons. It was published amid Russia’s predatory war of aggression – while atrocities were being committed in Bucha, Mariupol and other towns, and while Ukrainian civilians were being kidnapped, deported and sent to filtration camps. It was being published during extreme wartime censorship in Russia, indicating its approval by the Russian authorities.” – Hirsch
Politically, the “Bandera elite must be eliminated [as] its re-education is impossible.” Ukraine itself requires “cleans[ing] of Nazi elements… integrating this statehood into close cooperation with the Russian department for the denazification of Ukraine.” Russia will then create a “tribunal for crimes against humanity in the former Ukraine [and] in this regard act as the guardian of the Nuremberg Trials.”
Initial steps of denazification, according to Sergeitsev, can be defined as follows:
“Liquidation of armed Nazi formations, as well as the military, informational, educational infrastructure that ensures their activity;
Installation of the Russian information space;
The withdrawal of educational materials and the prohibition of educational programs at all levels containing Nazi ideological guidelines; and
Lustration, publication of the names of the accomplices of the Nazi regime, involving them in forced labor to restore the destroyed infrastructure as punishment for Nazi activities (from among those who will not be subject to the death penalty or imprisonment).”
UPDATED Vladimir Solovyov, pro-Kremlin presenter – Russian State TV Excerpts (April 7 – Dec. 17, 2022)
“Vladimir Volfovich [former member of the State Duma] made a genuine forecast. And it sounded like this: Zelensky is the last president of Ukraine because after him there will not be any Ukraine!” (April 7, translated by media monitor Francis Scarr)
“The troops of LPR and DPR are fighting for their land, and now I have a question: What would the Ukrainian territorial defense fight for? None of it is their land… We’re telling people: come to your senses! Remember who you are! Look at what’s been done to you! Look who conquered you! Remember your great past! Wake up, stop lying to yourselves! And that is the main point. Why are they making up a language for you? You are Rusyns [Slavic people] – do you need that language that Zelenskyy is trying to speak. Look at the history that is being made up for you, the religion that is being made up for you. That’s why people are for us. Westerners say, ‘Why don’t they greet you with flowers’? Yes, they are, big time. Despite their fear, they’re welcoming us, and they will welcome us even more when they understand that we’re never leaving.” (May 24, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
“Putin talks about reinforcing and enlargement, because returning means enlargement. What we lost before, now we need to take back… Who is going to be next? Eastern Europe is next, but they don’t want that. Who is the first to get flushed? Poland is the closest to Ukraine. The Baltics are the closest to the borders of the former USSR. That’s why they’re screaming the loudest.” (June 10, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
Solovyov likens the Russia-Ukraine crisis to “deworming a cat. For the doctor, it’s a special operation. For the worms – it’s a war, and for the cat, it’s a cleansing.” (July 19, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
“Don’t rush to buy maps for the new school year. It would be simply pointless.” (Aug. 5, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
“If we’d taken Kharkiv, it’s obvious that their main logistics and supply centre is there! Wipe it off the face of the fucking earth if we have to! Warn the civilians, tell them ‘You’ve got 24, 48 hours!’ After that we begin to destroy the city block by block.” (Oct. 25, translated by media monitor Francis Scarr)
“What’s happening in Ukraine won’t stay in Ukraine. A holy war is underway. We’re fighting for the right of mankind to live in its original state, as designed by the Creator. Those [Ukrainian] fools who are trying to fight – they aren’t fighting against us, they’re at war with God. In case of their victory, their end is certain. When I say that either we win, or the whole world will be reduced to ashes, this also has another meaning. How can humanity that fights against God continue to exist? … If you think about what’s happening, it’s Satanism. They’re purely demonic, you can’t put it any other way. We have to understand: games are over since we’re dealing with servants of the Prince of Darkness, since we’re dealing with a diabolical origin, what kind of negotiations could there be? Who are we talking to? What kind of negotiations could you have with Satan?” … The new Sodom and Gomorrah await the Lord’s judgment.” (Dec. 17, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
Russian State TV Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan and other pro-Putin figures or officials – “Ominous rhetoric gains ground in Russia as its forces founder in Ukraine” – Washington Post (April 13, 2022)
“On state television, a military analyst doubled down on Russia’s need to win and called for concentration camps for Ukrainians opposed to the invasion. Two days later, the head of the defense committee in the lower house of parliament said it would take 30 to 40 years to ‘reeducate’ Ukrainians.”The editor-in-chief of the television news network RT described “Ukrainians’ determination to defend their country as ‘collective insanity.’ ‘It’s no accident that we call them Nazis,’ said Margarita Simonyan, who also heads the Kremlin-backed media group that operates the Sputnik and RIA Novosti news agencies. ‘What makes you a Nazi is your bestial nature, your bestial hatred and your bestial willingness to tear out the eyes of children on the basis of nationality.’”
“In late March, the head of Russia’s Investigative Committee launched a probe into whether Ukrainian students’ textbooks ‘target Children with hatred of Russia and the Russian language’ and ‘distort history.’
Mentions of Kyiv and Ukraine are removed from the textbooks of the Prosveshcheniye publishing house – Mediazona (April 23, 2022)
An anonymous employee for the Russian Prosveshcheniye (Enlightenment) educational publishing house says that they are “faced with the task of making it as if Ukraine simply does not exist… It’s much worse when the textbook just doesn’t mention a country. A person grows up without a knowledge base about some country, and then it is much easier for him to believe what he is told about it from TV.”
The publishing house can “mention how [Russia] saved Kyiv, but it is no longer possible to talk about any independence of Ukraine as a country.”
Karen Shakhnazarov, pundit and filmmaker – “‘There will be no mercy’ Putin mouthpiece warns of ‘concentration camps, sterilisation’” – excerpts from Russian State TV channel Rossiya 1 via Express (May 4, 2022, via May 5, 2022 article)
Opponents of “Letter Z” must “‘understand that if they are counting on mercy, no, there will be no mercy for them. It all became very serious. In this case it means concentration camps, re-education, sterilization.’”
Russian political scientist Sergey Mikheev – Russian State TV Channel 1— translated by Francis Scarr of BBC Monitoring (May 8, 2022)
“Ukraine is in thrall to a Nazi-inspired ‘neo-pagan’ religion based on violence.”
“The ‘bloody paganism’ was founded by Ukrainian ‘accomplices of the Nazis’ during WWII and later cultivated by the diaspora in the US.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP - SO SIMILAR TO NETANYAHU'S LANGUAGE & THE "UNITY" MESSAGE:
Journalist Victoria Nikiforova op-ed – “It’s Time to Repeat” – RIA Novosti (May 9, 2022)
“Fighting is underway in eastern Ukraine. The Nazis torture and kill the inhabitants of the occupied territories.”
Russia is defined by “social harmony – difficult to achieve, but absolutely real” [SO BIBI]
The Ukrainian special operation has become Russia’s “war for peace. And not only in Russia, but also for world peace.”
UPDATEDMaria Zakharova, Russian Foreign Ministry’s official spokeswoman – Telegram posts by Zakharova – Telegram (June 3 – Dec. 29, 2022)
The Minsk agreements signed by Russia and Ukraine before 2022 in negotiations to end the war in the Donbas were “a chance for Kyiv to preserve the Ukrainian state. Zelensky, led by Westerners, publicly refused [Putin]. The Kyiv regime will not get a second such chance.” (June 3)
The Russian military is “fighting Nazism, neo-Nazism now, freeing Ukraine from the neo-Nazi dominance that has been fed there in recent decades by ‘Western partners.’” (June 22)
The policy of forced Ukrainization and persecution of everything Russian continues.” (June 22)
“Zelensky called Ukraine the only legitimate heir to Kievan Rus. Prince Volodymyr, then mind not being offended that part of Ukraine will be called Rus. I said it myself, well done.” (July 28)
“All that is left to the Kyiv regime, whose characteristic features have long been venality, anger, immorality, dementia and demonic possession. They go to the bottom, proudly raising their middle finger, which has become their shameful symbol.” (Nov. 24)
“The history of these places, like the whole history of Ukraine, is inseparable from the Russian one, and any attempts of the Kiev regime to rewrite it are doomed to failure.” (Dec. 29)
Alexander Egortsev, Special Correspondent of the Spas TV Channel, which is aligned with the Russian Orthodox Church and had more than 1 million subscribers before being blocked by YouTube and moving its account to the Russian version, RuTube – Goat muzzle. Satanism and the occult have become the ideology of the Ukrainian national battalions – RIA Novosti (June 3, 2022)
Alexander Sergeevich Khodakovsky, the commander of the Russian Vostok battalion, likens this [falsely alleged] behavior to the “occultism” that was “very strongly developed in Nazi Germany. And here we see worthy heirs. What they are doing is not compatible with the Christian faith and Orthodoxy. This is savagery…”
Archpriest Alexander Novopashin believes that the “essence of turning to Satanism is a rejection of Christianity and an attempt to resort to the help of supernatural forces to solve their problems – natural deities, energies or entities that allegedly help to gain power. Someone calls these dark forces Satan or the devil, someone talks about the Slavic gods, for example, Perun, Wotan, Odin, etc. Now there is little doubt who exported, fed and encouraged Nazism in the modern history of Ukraine.”
Dmitry Rogozin (Director General of Russia’s Roskosmos State Space Agency, former Deputy Prime Minister) – comments on his Twitter feed and Telegram channel (June 13 – June 27, 2022)
“In general, what has grown up in the place of Ukraine is an existential threat to the Russian people, Russian history, Russian language and Russian civilization. If we do not put an end to them, as, unfortunately, our grandfathers did not do away with them, we will have to die, but end up at an even greater cost to our grandchildren. So let’s get this over with. Once and forever. For our grandchildren.”
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova – “Ukraine in its previous borders no longer possible” (June 17, 2022)
“The Ukraine that you and I had known, within the borders that used to be, no longer exists, and will never exist again. This is evident.”
Rogozin – Telegram posts by Rogozin – Telegram (June 26 – 27, 2022)
The modern state of Ukraine is “a bastard formation of the Belovezhskaya conspiracy, where the Ukrainian party nomenclature gnawed off the ‘clothes of independence’ along with the Crimea, three military districts and the industrial Donbass. Moreover, the Ukrainian elites suppressed the Russian movement and Russian culture with fear and blood, deprived the indigenous Russian population in Ukraine of the right to speak their native language…Ukrainian elites are traitors…There is no forgiveness for traitors and betrayal!” (June 26)
The Kaliningrad and Baltic territories are “[Russia’s] land. And no revanchist and illiterate geeks can call this into question. We will defend our native land. Woe and cruel death to those who try to unleash aggression against Russia.” (June 27)
Kirill Stremousov, deputy head of the Russian administration in occupied Kherson, Ukraine – Telegram posts by Stremousov – Telegram (June 29 – Oct. 21, 2022)
Kherson is “going to Russia and in the near future we will regain our Motherland, from which we all come. The Kherson region will never return to the environment of Nazism, debauchery and cynicism.” (June 29)
“The army of the Russian Federation, luring mindless Ukronazis into fire bags, continues to cleanse the planet of fascism.” (Oct. 15)
“The result of this campaign is not the struggle for Ukraine, but the destroyed and ruined destinies of millions of Ukrainians.” (Oct. 21)
Vasily Fatigarov, Russian military expert – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by Francis Scarr of BBC Monitoring (June 30, 2022)
Russia “must carry out a large amount of methodical, competent and carefully considered work to denazify Ukraine…I like this kind of figurative comparison of the fascination of Ukraine with a cancerous tumor. [Russia is] now working like surgeons. And when a surgeon cuts out a cancerous tumor, while he’s cutting it, it’s growing. And when he cleans it up, he also has to clean up a certain amount of healthy tissue so that, God forbid, nothing remains and starts growing again. And that fascist infection is the same! That’s to say, if some of it remains somewhere, it will definitely start growing again. Therefore [Russia] will purify that territory very precisely, very severely, and ensure that that fascist infection doesn’t grow anywhere else.”
Putin – “Putin says Russia just starting in Ukraine, peace talks will get harder” – Reuters (July 7, 2022)
Putin says he believes the “West wants to fight [Russia] to the last Ukrainian. This is a tragedy for the Ukrainian people, but it seems that everything is heading towards this.”
Russian political scientist Mikhail Markelov – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (July 13, 2022)
Russia should “seriously think aboutliquidating Nazi leadership of [Ukraine], including not only Zelensky and his circle, but also the Verkhovna Rada [parliament] and the entire government that is currently committing total genocide against its own people.”
“I will remind you the words of the Russian president, which he uttered on the 24th of February: ‘You wanted decommunization? You’re going to get it.’
“Initially, we were just planning to liberate only those who live in Donbas and to free Donbas from the yoke of the Nazis, but after the deliveries of Western weapons, if, God forbid, Americans deliver missiles that can travel 300 kilometers, then we simply can’t stop at all.”
Simonyan – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (July 19, 2022)
“Ukraine as it was can’t continue to exist. There’ll be no Ukraine we’ve known for many years.” (July 19, 2022, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
Nikolai Korsakov –The baptism of Russia and the special operation in Ukraine: what do they have in common? – Gazeta (July 28, 2022)
“Morality does not exist for Ukronazis, they do not reason in such categories and are not afraid of God’s punishment for their atrocities. Many of the Ukronazis are open Satanists and followers of misanthropic cults who make sacrifice and commit ritual murders, experts conclude.”
Head of State Duma Defense Committee Andrey Kartaolov – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 1, 2022)
Ukraine “has to be restored, rebuilt from scratch, but the biggest problem today is people. There are also children. And children are the very category that was the most mistreated by the Banderite Nazi scumbags, who simply brainwashed them… We need to deal with the children, perhaps in our Suvorov’s, Nakhimov’s cadet schools, there could be additional enrollment and we could send these kiddies there. Maybe Moscow’s higher educational institutions, and others in the country, should reserve additional spots for students who could be placed on a budgetary basis, in free dormitories. Today, they can’t pay anything for their education. Nonetheless, we have to do this because then people will believe that we’re serious, and Russia is here for a long time – forever.”
Russian journalist and military expert Igor Korotchenko – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 5, 2022)
“Ukraine is part of the historical Russia. Ukraine as a country never existed. Ukraine’s political elites made a choice to turn it into the project ‘anti-Russia.’ These kinds of countries have no right to exist from the perspective of our country’s national interests. Neither the West, nor the United States, can influence the will and determination of our country’s leadership and of our people to ensure that this kind of a threat can never exist in our history from the territory of a country currently called Ukraine.”
Soviet-Russian filmmaker Nikita Mikhalkov – excerpt from speech on the Ukrainian language – translated by media monitor Maksym Borodin (Aug. 26, 2022)
“The Ukrainian language has become the image of Russophobia… That is, the phrases that we hear in Ukrainian transcription and pronunciation, they are for us and for the world in principle and for themselves the formulation of hatred for Russia!”
Russian mercenary Igor Mangushev – speech on the Russia – Ukraine war – translated by journalist Denys Kazanskyi (Aug. 28, 2022)
[holding a skull in his hand] “We’re alive, and this guy’s already dead. Let him burn in hell. He wasn’t lucky. We’ll make a goblet out of his skull. We are not at war with people of blood and flesh, we are at war with the idea, with the idea of Ukraine as an anti-Russian state. There can be no peace. We must de-Ukrainize Ukraine. We must return our Russian lands… This is the tragedy of Ukrainian soldiers. We don’t care how many we have to kill them. If we were at war with people, we could make peace with them. But we are at war with the idea, so all bearers of an idea must be killed. Like this guy, probably he did not want to lie near Azovstal.”
Putin – Address by the President of the Russian Federation (Sept. 21, 2022)
“We know that the majority of people living in the territories liberated from the neo-Nazis, and these are primarily the historical lands of Novorossiya, do not want to live under the yoke of the neo-Nazi regime.”
The citizens of Russia can rest assured that the territorial integrity of our Motherland, our independence and freedom will be defended – I repeat – by all the systems available to us.”
Putin – People’s Choice: Together Forever Concert Rally (Sept. 30, 2022)
“I cannot help but go back to the time when the Soviet Union was formed, when Russia was creating modern Ukraine. It was Russia that created modern Ukraine, giving it significant swathes of land, historical lands of Russia, along with the people, who no one asked about where and how they want to live, how they see the future of their children, and in which country. The same thing happened when the Soviet Union broke apart.”
“Only modern Russia has given the residents of the Lugansk People’s Republic, the Donetsk People’s Republic, Zaporozhye and Kherson the right to choose. People came to the referendum and made their choice to be with their historical homeland, Russia.”
Putin – Signing of treaties on accession of Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics and Zaporozhye and Kheron regions to Russia (Sept. 30, 2022)
“It is an inherent right of the people. It is based on our historical affinity, and it is that right that led generations of our predecessors, those who built and defended Russia for centuries since the period of Ancient Rus, to victory.”
“There is nothing stronger than the determination of millions of people who, by their culture, religion, traditions, and language, consider themselves part of Russia, whose ancestors lived in a single country for centuries. There is nothing stronger than their determination to return to their true historical homeland.
NEW Andrey Sidorov, Deputy Dean of world politics at Moscow State University – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 9, 2022)
“We should wait for the right moment and cause a migration crisis in Europe with a new influx of Ukrainians… I think it’s most beneficial to do it in the new year, towards the spring, because the situation will start to worsen by then, in terms of economic and social tensions in Europe. So the situation we’re living through right now should be handled rationally, not emotionally. And the rationale is: Ukraine as a nation should not exist.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP - SO JEW-HATING!
Russia-aligned leader in the Donetsk “People’s Republic” of Ukraine Pavel Gubarev – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 11, 2022)
“These are Russian people, possessed by the devil. We are coming to convince them, not to kill them. But if you don’t want us to change your minds, then we will kill you. We will kill as many of you as we have to. We will kill 1 million, or 5 million; we can exterminate all of you until you understand that you’re possessed and you have to be cured.
Zelensky is the main possessed one there, he is really the devil’s spawn. He is the Hitler 2.0 with his rabid nationalism, with that rabid Russophobia, with images of a woman cutting a throat, they are bloody possessed Satanists from the standpoint of the Christian thought. From the secular point of view, these are anti-system liberal consumers, stupid people, who can’t figure out what’s happening.”
Member of the Russian State Duma Andrey Gurulyov – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 19, 2022)
“If you have no water, no sewer, we’re projecting the flood of refugees toward Western borders, Correct?Because it’s impossible to survive. There is no heating, no water, no sewer, no lights. You can’t cook food, no place to store food, there is no way to transport the food… How does one live in a country where nothing works?”
Analysis comments by TULPPP: SO BIBI NETANYAHU
Anton Krasovsky, then-Director of Broadcasting for RT (reportedly suspended after making this statement) – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 23, 2022)
“[Ukrainian children] should have been drowned in the Tysyna [river], right there, where the duckling swims. Just drown those children, drown them right in Tysyna [river]… Whoever says that Moskals occupied them, you throw them in the river with a strong undercurrent… Over there, every piece of shit little house, there are masses of awful, monstrous little houses, they shit all over the Carpathian Mountains. Carpathian Mountains are disgusting, every hut over there is called ‘smerekova khata.’ Shove them right into those huts and burn them up… [Ukraine] is not supposed to exist at all.”
Vladlen Tatarsky, Pro-Kremlin blogger and war correspondent – Interview with Russian State TV host Sergey Mardan – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 23, 2022)
“What are Ukrainians? I suddenly understood it. A Ukrainian is a Russian who got sick. Like a transvestite, he was born a man, then something happened, he had an operation, decided to become a woman and live like one. He puts on a dress, a wig, puts lipstick on, and goes that way all over town. It looks a bit peculiar, you think: is that a man? That’s a man – no, that’s a woman. A Ukrainian is a Russian spiritual transvestite, who is trying to squeeze into another skin. I was always interested: when was this moment when they have shifted from a healthy Russian person, let’s say, a Southern Russian person, and into total schizophrenia. The future of Ukraine, those people who live there, is that they are Russian people and they will return to their normal state.”
“When we win in Ukraine, the future of these people is that they are Russian people, who recovered from their craziness, their spiritual transvestism, and returned to their normal state.”
“In order to reset things way back, all of those [Holodomor] monuments have to be destroyed, and all of those cult sites, all monuments erected after 1991 that are related to Ukraine’s independence, or its new and remade history, have to be completely destroyed.”
Sergey Mardan then says, “It’s impossible to defeat Ukrainianism as an idea if you don’t formulate a counter-idea… [Alexander] Dugin is correct a hundredfold when he says that in order to defeat Ukraine, you have to defeat Ukraine within yourself. That aggressive, fascist, misanthropic ideology of Western liberalism has to be eradicated in its every form. They are countless, they permeate our entire life. We have to eliminate them here. And only then we will win.”
NEW Oleg Karpovich, Director of the Institute of Contemporary Studies at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs – “On the way to real denazification” – (Oct. 25, 2022)
“The prevention of new bloody crises in Russian-Ukrainian relations will be possible only when it is possible to erase from the minds of Ukrainians the traces of the joint efforts of the collective West and its local collaborators to set the Slav brothers against each other. To do this, firstly, it is necessary to create an attractive alternative, cleansed of the legacy of more than thirty years of occupation, in the new Russian territories – to demonstrate to those residents of Ukraine who have not succumbed to propaganda that a choice in favor of a future freed from toxic ‘Ukrainianism’ is always possible.”
“The liberation of the Ukrainian people means a comprehensive and effective counteraction to destructive myths, which made it possible to endow the descendants of the Bandera militants with additional arguments in favor of the destruction of the Russian-speaking ‘Untermensch’. We are liberating not only territories, but also minds that have been repeatedly poisoned by the Russophobic authorities of the country.”
Assistant Secretary of the Security Council of Russia Alexey Pavlov — What is cooked in the “witch’s cauldron.” Neo-pagan cults gain strength in Ukraine — Federal AIF (Oct. 26, 2022)
“I believe that with the continuation of the special military operation, it becomes more and more urgent to carry out the de-Satanization of Ukraine, or, as the head of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov aptly put it, its ‘complete de-Satanization.’”
NEWPetr Akopov, Russian propagandist – “A new stage of the dismantling of Ukraine has begun” – RIA Novosti via DISCRED.RU (Nov. 10, 2022)
“We need to return Ukraine to its natural state of part of the Russian world.”
“The entire current Ukrainian elite and the current state of Ukraine are doomed.”
“We will not allow generations of Ukrainians and South Russian people to continue to be brought up in the denial of their own Russianness and in their hatred for Russia. The current Ukraine is incompatible with Russia – neither with the historical (because it is part of it), nor with the future, because it will be used against us.”
NEW Dmitry Steshin, war correspondent – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Nov. 19, 2022)
“These [Ukrainian] people have shaped themselves, their identity on the denial of everything that is Muscovite. This is a horrid deviation, because at its root is their denial of themselves. Therefore, you can’t consider them as people with full-fledged morality and normal mental apparatus. It became clear to me a long time ago, when I came up with the term ‘crypto-Banderites.’ We don’t need to liberate anyone over there. We need to take what’s ours and make it so that they’re afraid to even think about so much as to breathe the wrong way towards Russia… We’ll see what kind of a beautiful life we’ll create for them and how they’ll want to again rethink their identity.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP: SO ISRAELI
NEW Boris Chernyshov, State Duma member – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Nov. 19, 2022)
“These retaliatory strikes – and they are retaliatory – it’s an expression of our hatred, our holy hatred. They’ll be sitting without gas, without light, and without everything else. If the Kyiv regime chose the path of war criminals, they have to freeze and rot over there.”
NEWRostislav Ishchenko, political scientist – Interview with Russian State TV host Sergey Mardan – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Nov. 27, 2022)
“From my point of view, as long as Ukraine continues to exist in any state, the threat to Russia will also continue to exist. Clearly, Ukraine is not the only one posing a threat, but Ukraine is a direct, constant threat. You can deal with Hungarians, Poles, Americans, Mexicans or anybody else, even with penguins in the Antarctic, but you can’t agree on anything with Russian people who call themselves Ukrainians on the basis of rejecting everything that is Russian. This is an eschatological enemy. Therefore, in my opinion,I don’t know whether or not [Ukraine] will remain… I believe that all efforts should be devoted to make sure that there is not even a memory left of it.”
TV host Mardan then says, “I believe that this is rational for everyone: for us, for citizens of the former Ukrainian Soviet Republic, and even for the Europeans, if you can believe it. Even the Poles would benefit by Ukraine not existing. It would be much more peaceful for everybody… Right now, the barbarians are on our Western borders. A difficult campaign against barbarians is underway.”
NEW Yuri Kot, pro-government pundit – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Francis Scarr (Jan. 11, 2023)
“Such people have taken to the dark side and are proving themselves to be Russophobes, so it’s simply pointless to try talking to them in human terms. They’re enemies, just enemies… The enemy’s children can be re-educated, but the enemy himself must be eliminated!”
NEW Vyacheslav Molotov, State Duma member – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Jan. 16, 2023)
“To a large degree, this is an eschatological conflict. This is not a conflict between Russians and Ukrainians, which is entirely artificial. We are one people. This is a conflict of good versus evil, light versus darkness… War is a cruel thing. At the same time, we’re stronger than [Ukrainians] are because we are humans and over there, they’re mostly the non-humans.”
https://www.justsecurity.org/81789/russias-eliminationist-rhetoric-against-ukraine-a-collection/
“The language of the [Ukrainian] enemy should not be studied. It should not be respected, it should not exist! There shouldn’t be any horrible signs in this language, no materials [in Ukrainian], nothing at all! This is an incitement to ethnic hatred, it’s prohibited! This [Ukrainian] language should not exist… Neither this [Ukrainian] nation nor this language should exist! Cleanse it all out, cleanse out all of its sources.”
Putin – Answer to question about drone attack on Moscow and Moscow Region (May 30, 2023)
“The territory that is called Ukraine was virtually controlled from the very beginning by people who, being led by the West, took the path of not just confronting Russia, but creating an ‘anti-Russia’ on that territory.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP: SO BIBI
Andrey Norkin, State TV host – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (May 31, 2023)
“Strictly put, why aren’t we destroying them [Ukrainians] like rats?”
Bogdan Bezpalko, Member of the Russian Council for Interethnic Relations – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (May 31, 2023)
“I’ll be brief: Victory means the destruction of Ukraine’s nationhood.”
Vlad Shlepchenko, journalist of nationalist pro-Putin media outlet – Ukrainian drones opened the way for cruise missiles to Moscow: There is only one way out! – Tsargrad (May 31, 2023)
“The only way to 100% protect our country from Ukrainian strikes is to destroy Ukrainian statehood, eliminate its military-political leadership and armed forces, reach the western borders as quickly as possible and return historically Russian lands to Russia. Fight. Until victory.”
Aleksandr Dugin, Russian political analyst – Comments at “What Kind of Ukraine Do We Need?” Forum in Moscow – via Russian news site PolitNavigator (June 1, 2023)
“We needed a friendly Ukraine. The only Ukraine we need is a friendly Ukraine. After 30 years she was rapidly leaving, turning into an unfriendly Ukraine, we could endure, endure, tolerate a neutral Ukraine… But hostile Ukraine, which is joining NATO, we not only do not need, it is impossible. This is the explanation of the Special Military Operation…
A friendly Ukraine could survive, develop and gradually become a full-fledged, sovereign state. Neutral is already more problematic, because the balance was difficult, some situations led us to tough decisions. But when it became openly hostile, especially after 2014, after that Ukraine no longer exists for us. Since the 14th year, we no longer need any Ukraine, we don’t need any Ukraine, and we are fighting so it doesn’t exist anymore.”
Natalya Nikanorova, Senator of the Donetsk People’s Republic – Comments at “What Kind of Ukraine Do We Need?” Forum in Moscow – via Russian state-owned news site Ukraina.ru (June 1, 2023)
“I know that there are discussions in the scientific community about this plan [of denazification]… We have all the evidence of infection with the virus. But we need to decide on our official attitude towards the Kiev regime: what kind of regime is this, what kind of relations do we see in the future, what signs of denazification are we seeing? And then we will be able to build our positions.”
Dmitry Evstafiev, School of Integrated Communications professor at HSE (Higher School of Economics) University – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 2, 2023 – June 10, 2023)
“About Bakhmut, it looks like a universe of death. The point of existence of this social system, which can’t be described as a civilization – self-destruction is its reason for existing, as well as destroying everything else. This is a universe of death! The behavior of the Ukrainian leadership – the so-called Ukrainian leadership, since we know that it’s really based in Washington, DC, we understand all of that – but this group that is in charge of operations of the territory by the name of the former Ukrainian Socialist Republic, their goal is self destruction as well as maximum destruction of culture, values, people, industries, even agriculture.” (June 2, 2023, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
“I keep looking at the Kyiv regime, at its military, at the Westerners who are courting this regime and are supporting it in every way – they don’t feel any pain. Do you know who feels no pain? The dead! They are already dead! They are the undead! Our army, our heroes are fighting against the undead! They fight the darkness that drowns out the light! They can’t feel pain! They don’t care!” (June 10, 2023, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
Vlad Shlepchenko, journalist of nationalist pro-Putin media outlet – Three cities of Ukraine that will save the Russians. Direction of impact marked – Tsargrad (June 2, 2023)
“In the current situation, it is obvious that the preservation of Ukraine as an allegedly independent state does not make any sense. The security of Russia as a whole and of individual citizens requires the complete liberation of the historically Russian lands. Ukraine must be destroyed.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP: DENAZIFICATION
Konstantin Zatulin, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, Eurasian Integration and Relations with Compatriots – The State Duma stated the failure of all Putin’s goals in Ukraine – The Moscow Times (June 3, 2023)
“On which of these points [of denazification, demilitarization and neutrality of Ukraine] did we achieve results? None. Moreover, some of them have ceased to have any meaning. For example, the neutrality of Ukraine. What is the meaning of this requirement? None at the moment. It will not be neutral if it remains in existence.”
UPDATED Olga Skabeeva, State TV Host – Russian State TV Excerpts (June 4, 2023 – June 17, 2023)
“We can draw only one conclusion: the Ukrainian question has to be solved once and for all. Otherwise, it may be too late… What comes to mind right now, I will say it again, is to destroy every living thing in the Kharkiv region as a punishment and as a deterrent.” (June 4, 2023, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
“[Dmitry] Medvedev, who is currently proposing for us to find and destroy all the holed-up roaches, said 1 year ago that if they [Ukrainians] infringe on Russian Crimea, there will be a big crater where Kyiv used to be.” (June 17, 2023, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
Vladimir Skachko, journalist of Russian state-owned, pro-Putin media outlet – How Ukrainians can save their immortal soul and mortal body – Ukraina.ru (June 5, 2023)
“The first goal [of the NWO] – the denazification – will help save the immortal [Ukrainian] soul, cleanse it from the haze of neo-Nazism, racism, xenophobia, national arrogance and misanthropy, with the help of which the Ukrainian people are not only cemented into some kind of aggressive and evil community waging war, but also turned into a hostage nation and the kamikaze people thrown into this war.”
“The second goal – demilitarization – is designed to save the mortal body of Ukrainians, providing them with peace and taking away weapons from their hands… With the complete transition of Ukraine into Russia, everything will become clear – it will be disarmed in accordance with Russian laws.”
“Ukrainians should be offered a re-education matrix that should help them freely and consciously, but at first under strict control, acquire new state structures and institutions of power at all levels, a new economic policy and a new identity. If not in a family, then at least in good neighborliness with other people and states.”
Yuri Knutov, Military Analyst – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 5, 2023)
[Responding to another analyst discussing the severity of war] “Bringing up some Ukraine – Ukraine is nothing! It’s a puppet controlled by strings! More than 50 countries are commanding Ukraine!”
Alexei Zhuravlyov, State Duma member – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 6, 2023)
[Regarding the Kakhovka Dam collapse] “[Ukrainians] have about 600 [tanks], so they’ll keep coming. They will certainly keep doing it. They will keep bluntly crawling forward, like roaches, until all of them get squashed.”
Putin – Plenary session of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum (June 16, 2023)
“Bandera was an anti-Semite and a neo-Nazi. But no one appears to want to hear that because Zelensky has Jewish blood. But he is covering for these freaks, these neo-Nazis, with his actions… If this is not the current edition of neo-Nazism, then what is it? We have every right to believe that our goal of denazifying Ukraine is one of the key goals.”
Ishchenko – Interview with Ukraina.ru Correspondent Alexander Porunov – Ukraina.ru (June 17, 2023)
“Now Ukrainian statehood has been destroyed and destroyed, but the presence of efficient law enforcement agencies implies the possibility, relying on Western or Russian money, on anyone else’s, but on external support, on Chinese, a quick restoration of such statehood, no matter what, Nazi or anti-Nazi. But the presence of a power lever suggests that statehood can be restored fairly quickly. If this power lever does not exist and these structures are completely disintegrated and destroyed, then, given that Ukraine no longer has any administrative or political efficient structures, then restoration seems completely impossible. Then, not only for us, but also for our neighbors, the question arises whether Ukraine has or not in order to restore the normal administration of its own territory. Who will manage these territories and how it will be carried out.”
“If we go to the borders of NATO, then there is no such Ukraine anymore. There is Russia here, and there is NATO.”
“Yes, it was no such coincidence that we talked about denazification and demilitarization. Demilitarization and neutralization presupposes that the armed force that is capable of posing a threat to Russia will disappear from the state. Neutralization assumes that foreign troops will no longer be located on its territory. Denazification assumes that pro-Western politicians, who turned out to be all Nazis, will no longer be able to come to power there. Consequently, the de facto neutralization, denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine presupposes the creation of a Russian protectorate out of it.”
Analysis comments by TULPPP: DEMONIZING THEM AS EVIL just like bibi
Vyacheslav Nikonov, State Duma deputy – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 21, 2023)
[Responding to a question about the message of Russia holding elections in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions] “The message is totally clear: that this is forever! A legitimate government is needed and it will be Russian.”
NEW Yevgeny Nikiforov, head of the Orthodox Radio Channel “Radonezh” — Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 3, 2023)
“[Ukrainians are] godless, it’s all about godlessness… The main problem is our own faint-heartedness! From the very start, we’ve been trying to negotiate! You can’t make deals with demons! There’s nothing to negotiate… They have no laws, they are a lawless people! They are the offspring of lawlessness… The illness in Ukraine is so far gone that you can’t convince them or negotiate with them. You can’t cure them this way! Only surgery will work there. The only response to these statements by the Nazis is a Solntsepyok [heavy thermobaric rocket launcher]. It has to be burned out! Some will say, ‘Oy, this is not a Christian method!’ This way is quite Christian! These people position themselves as pagans! Then take it like pagans! No New Testament ethics for you! Only the Old Testament! Like the apostle, who personally slit the throats of 300 servants at the Valaam! This is how we should deal with these too! Destroy them without any doubt! Apply only the Old Testament ethics! This is the only language they understand!”
NEW Sergei Markov, Putin’s former advisor — Russian State TV Excerpts (Aug. 5, 2023 – Aug. 11, 2023)
“Understand, Ukraine is the main test site in the world for creating an artificial society! Sometimes it is said that there is fascism there. Fascists and Banderites are a tiny part of their society! They have an artificial political-scientific fascism, created by American and British political technologies! They will turn them into zombies, into cult members, I think they will force some to become homosexuals!” (Aug. 5, 2023, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
“[Ukrainians] were part of a highly developed civilization! The main principle is widely known:
Ukraine with Russia is flourishing, Ukraine without Russia turns into ruins. Right now, it’s turning into ruins!
Ukraine does not exist as an independent nation. Ukraine exists as a geographical region, it has beautiful landscapes and poor, unhappy, suffering people.
The occupation of Ukraine is not the same as it was in the times of Hitler.
The occupation of Ukraine by Americans is the occupation of state institutions and occupation of people’s minds, with a forced change of identity! These are the latest political technologies, which change the identities of people! They turn into an army of zombies. That is what poor Ukraine is going through right now…
That’s why the name of Ukraine is now synonymous with the word “catastrophe” and self-destruction of their own country! That’s why our special operation is not a war against Ukraine, this is a war of liberation of these unfortunate people from a terrorist occupation by a nation which is tormenting and killing them and us and is ready to kill all the rest!” (Aug. 11, 2023, translated by media monitor Julia Davis)
Analysis comments by TULPPP: like bibi the right to self defense against terrorists
NEW Ishchenko — Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 11, 2023)
“Our problem is that we wage a war of liberation, but a significant part of Ukraine’s population recognizes themselves as Ukrainians, having rejected their Russianness. They view this as a war of national liberation. They are trying to liberate themselves from us. We are liberating them from Banderites… From the standpoint of preserving Russia’s security, can Ukraine as such even exist? We should understand that relations with Ukraine are not like relations with Poland. Relations with Ukraine are relations with a part of Russia that declared itself anti-Russia. For this part, we are the absolute evil a priori. If we allow a part of Ukrainian nationhood to remain, we are creating a future problem and a revanchist structure on our borders. If we can’t swallow it whole, then we should try to forcefully split it up with our neighbors, like Belarus, but we simply cannot keep this around for the future.”
NEW Ishchenko — “Nonviolent” suppression of Ukrainian as a strategy for Russian victory — via Russian state-owned news site Ukraina.ru (Aug. 21, 2023)
“Textbooks will also be printed by the local budget, only they will be written by specially selected people, so that a Ukrainized child, in a language he understands, receives information that he is actually Russian, it’s just that the last generation of his ancestors fell into the heresy of Ukrainianism, which seriously ruined the life of not only himself, but even for him (the child), since his Ukrainized education will not be in demand further than his native village, maximum district. Russianness opens up unprecedented prospects for a career in the civil service, literature, art or business, both within Russia and abroad.”
“State propaganda will have to actively implant a simple thought in the brain:
a Ukrainian is a Russian, whose horizon is limited to the outskirts of his native village and the nearest forest.
A person with the necessary and sufficient level of intellectual development from Ukrainian quickly grows into Russian, even if he is unlucky to be born into a Ukrainianized family.”
“With a serious approach to the matter, Ukrainianness will begin to collapse in all new territories without any repression, and in twenty to thirty years Ukrainian schools and choral singing and embroidery circles will remain only as harmless relics. Moreover, they will even be useful, since they will become a kind of “honey trap”, where all the unfinished Bandera will be drawn. The competent authorities will not need to make special efforts to identify all potentially disloyal ones – it will be enough to have lists of graduates of the relevant schools (the school also always collects information about parents).”
NEW Egor Kucher — The War is Lost, Ukraine has been Sentenced: Only Russia Can Save It — Tsargrad (Aug. 21, 2023)
“We are accustomed to the fact that the main horrors of modern Ukraine are neo-Nazism, Ukrainianism, debauchery in the worst form, militant Russophobia, rewriting history, corruption and puppet anti-democracy.
But in the information field little attention is paid to the fact that Ukraine represents the moral and ethical collapse of the anti-Christian state, which has become the black sheep of both the Russian and, more broadly, the Slavic world.”
“With such a level of decline in public morality, the rejection of traditional Christian values, the formation of a destructive identity, the basis of which is hatred of Russians on ethnic grounds, Ukraine no longer has a normal state and nation.”
NEW Ivan Lizan, Journalist — Having lost their heads, they don’t cry over their hair: about the main loss of Ukraine – Ukraina.ru (Aug. 24, 2023)
“If Ukraine remains at least in some part, then there will no longer be industry on this territory. And until a qualitatively different statehood is created there, there is and cannot be any chance of its revival, and with it a society capable of creation. But the paradox of Ukraine is that its atomized society is incapable of creating anything, including the state as a complex social organism. This means that with each subsequent year of Ukrainian independence, the list of losses of the Ukrainian people will become longer and longer until Ukraine itself is swallowed up by its neighbors, who have a state, an economy and a more or less healthy society.”
NEW Igor Markov, former politician — Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 28, 2023)
“When I hear discussions about the future of Ukraine, whether Ukraine will remain, I think that people don’t even understand what is happening… About deliveries of weapons and F-16s, by the time these planes and pilots are ready, the nation of Ukraine should no longer exist!”
NEW Elena Markosyan, political commentator— Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Sept. 2, 2023)
“What is Ukraine? What has this country turned into? I don’t even know what to call it… The Ukrainian language cannot become the foundation of Ukraine’s development, or in all other spheres, like its stabilization or politics. I know that it’s impossible, because it immediately cuts the entire society off from the deepest levels of Russian culture! Everything lives in it and grows out of it… Ukraine decided it can build all of it on the basis of the Ukrainian language! Here is the result! Every face is a pig snout! Every action is a joke! It resulted in the country’s degradation! I have no hatred for these people. I have no pity for them either! I look at it as a doctor! A doctor has to cure a sickness! A person who has become ill this way!”
Analysis comments by TULPPP: THIS IS BIBI
NEW Skachko — Degradation as a path of development. New six “de-” of neo-Nazi Ukraine — Ukraina.ru (Sept. 10, 2023)
“These five ‘de-’ then turned out to be primitive, but, alas, obvious:
1) desovereignization – the loss of state sovereignty for the sake of the illusory benefits of staying in the European Union, which did not intend and does not intend to accept Ukraine as a full member;
2) deindustrialization – the destruction of the Ukrainian economy, which could be a competitor to the European or transnational economy;
3) depopulation – a reduction in the population, which is recognized as “excessive” for a reformatted Ukraine, primarily pensioners, the elderly and the sick;
4) de-democratization – replacing generally accepted democratic methods of forming and renewing power with technologies from electoral manipulation of election results to direct coups in the form of Maidans and “color revolutions,” of which there were two in Ukraine. Usurpation of power;
5) de-intellectualization – lowering the educational and intellectual level of the “people” by abandoning the previous education system and introducing technologies for manipulating and dumbing down the minds, primarily of the younger generations.
This has all happened in recent years and continues in Ukraine, breaking all conceivable and inconceivable anti-records and reducing its entire existence to one, but the main “de-” – degradation. But since it is not possible to completely remove the Ukrainian “people” (there must remain aborigines who would work “for their uncle” in the “liberated” and “democratized” territories and lands), then new five “de-” were needed, introduced into the heads of based on rabid zoological nationalism, in fact neo-Nazism. Ukrainian. For what? Legitimate but stupid question. To dupe and properly zombify the remaining population in Ukraine, to brainwash and reformat them (the brains) according to new attitudes and postulates. To completely abandon the past in order to build a new future.”
“The special military operation (SVO) of Russia in Ukraine has completely exposed all the negative processes, but is designed to stop the processes of degradation with which all these eleven “de-” have merged. However, everyone is now deciding how Ukraine will remain, having already been turned into anti-Russia – de-Ukraine, if linguistic research continues.”
NEW Ishchenko -– On the issue of the post-war structure of Ukraine – Ukraina.ru (Sept. 11, 2023)
“Let me remind you that military operations against Ukraine have been going on for a year and a half, and it has been drinking blood from Russia for more than thirty years.
The Americans would never have thrown Ukraine into the war against Russia if it were not for the all-conquering kleptomania and inability for state building of the Ukrainian ruling elite.
Ukrainian rulers stole Ukraine from themselves and sold it at retail for cheap, only by doing this forcing the Americans to throw this asset into the furnace of war. Without war, a devastated Ukraine would become too burdensome – more would have to be spent on its maintenance than the damage caused to Russia by the existence of such a Ukraine.”
“A small area with a predominantly agricultural economy is inexpensive to maintain. The new Ukraine will be turned into something like a military settlement:
they feed themselves and are always ready to fight against Russia (the idea of revenge), if only they supply weapons.
A surviving, albeit reduced, Ukraine will be a source of permanent dual loyalty within Russia. I’m not talking about outright disloyalty. It’s unpleasant, but you can fight it. I’m talking about double loyalty, which we saw during the collapse of the USSR in the example of the population of the Union republics, when it turned out that for the majority their regional decision-making center turned out to be more important than the all-Union one.”
“Ukraine will be the same as it was — a black hole sucking up Russian resources. Only a more effectively managed black hole, whose elite will be placed under the direct control of the West and will be led not by the idea of selling everything and running away to Switzerland, but by thoughts of revenge.”
For updated information, continue to this tracker:
Russia's Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection