PUTIN PURSUES GENOCIDE OF UKRAINIANS

Ukrainians Fight for Their Freedom, and for Our Freedom.

They Fight for all Humanity.

Contents | CAMPAIGN OF GENOCIDE AGAINST UKRAINE & ALL UKRAINIANS

STYLE | VIDEO | Quotes from Russian Media illustrate Russia's Gangster-Style Hatred of Ukrainians

RECRUITED to Spread DISINFORMATION| PRO-PUTIN UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS (in Exile)

VIDEO | Quotes from Russian Media illustrate Russia's Gangster-Style Hatred of Ukrainians

RECRUITED to Spread DISINFORMATION| PRO-PUTIN UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS (in Exile)

EX 1) Vladmir Skachko | Russia Comment: THE 5Ds of Ukrainian DESTRUCTION 

EX 2) Ishchenko Rostilav | Turn Ukraine into Depopulated Rump State 

#Compilation | Examples of ELIMINATIONIST LANGUAGE against Ukrainians

STYLE | VIDEO | Quotes from Russian Media illustrate Russia's Gangster-Style Hatred of Ukrainians

You Tube Link to RussiaMediaMonitor and its curator Daily Beast columnist Julia Davis

Selected Quotes from 02Sep2023 (see videos below)

Russian panelists | Fear is better than Love, If they fear you, then this means they RESPECT you.

Posted on 02Sep2023 by @russianmediamonitor

Russian panelist | Russia is embroiled in a holy war against Ukraine and the West

Posted on 02Sep2023 by @russianmediamonitor

RECRUITED to Spread DISINFORMATION| PRO-PUTIN UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS (in Exile)

The Pro-Putin Ukrianian Oligarch | Viktor Medvedchuk

Radio Free Europe | Disinformation | Apr 2023

Recruited Traitors and Propagandists

Radio Free Europe | Disinformation | Apr 2023

DISINFORMATION | Putin's Oligarch Recruits Traitors to Promote "Another Ukraine" 

Putin's friend comes up with "Another Ukraine" and recruits traitors and propagandists

Iryna Balachuk — Wednesday, 26 April 2023 |

iryna.balachuk@pravda.ua

From <https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/authors/4fbf7d8edf344/> and https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news-skhemy-medvedchuk-drugaya-ukraina/32380806.html

 COLLAGE BY RADIO LIBERTY. ALL PHOTOS FROM THE RADIO LIBERTY WEBSITE

Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch and personal friend of Putin's who is accused of treason and is now living in Russia following a prisoner swap, has founded a "political movement" called Another Ukraine which is attracting fugitives from Ukraine:

political commentators from now shut-down pro-Russian TV channels,

local council members from the Opposition Platform – For Life [a political faction that was headed by Medvedchuk – ed.], and political strategists accused of treason and separatism. 

Source: Skhemy project (Radio Liberty)

Details: It was in late January 2023 that journalists first noticed that the Another Ukraine project had begun operating, primarily on Russian social media, where its spokespeople, who have managed to escape punishment and flee Ukraine, parrot or supplement the messages of Russian propaganda.

Quotes from these fugitives and traitors about allegedly "crazy Nazis in Ukraine", "Satanism and lawlessness", "desecration of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra" (Monastery of the Caves) and so on are then picked up and cited by Kremlin-controlled media.

Notably, Medvedchuk's political movement has been joined by:

Volodymyr Skachko, accused under Art. 110.2 of the Criminal Code (encroachment on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine).

Skachko has been wanted by the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) since March 2019. According to the Office of the Prosecutor General, "the accused is on the territory of the Russian Federation, in the city of Moscow", and "the pre-trial investigation has not established any information about the method by which he left the territory of Ukraine". 

Volodymyr Skachko

"Political expert" Yurii Dudkin, who was served with a notice of suspicion under Art. 111 (high treason) and 161 (violation of the equality of citizens) in 2021. His case is being considered in absentia, since according to the Prosecutor General's Office, 62-year-old Dudkin left Ukraine in June 2022. According to Skhemy, he left in the direction of Poland through the Rava Ruska checkpoint on 7 June 2022.

Yurii Dudkin

Former Ukrainian journalist Denys Zharkykh, whose public statements prompted an investigation ordered by former Prosecutor General Yurii Lutsenko. According to Skhemy, Zharkykh crossed the Ukrainian-Slovak border in September 2022. The Border Guard Service did not respond when asked on what grounds Zharkykh, 55, was allowed to leave during martial law. Nor have Yurii Lutsenko and the prosecutor's office answered the question of how the 2018 investigation into Zharkykh's activities ended.

Denys Zharkykh

Political strategist Andrii Mishyn, who has been working for Medvedchuk for at least a decade and fled Ukraine for Russia in January 2023. Mishyn himself told Russian media about his escape through Poland and Belarus, saying that he was afraid of the Ukrainian special services. In 2013, Mishyn was a speaker at Ukrainian Choice, a women's political club, and appeared on pro-Russian TV channels as an expert. The Border Guard Service did not provide an answer when asked on what grounds Mishyn, 57, was allowed to cross the border during martial law.

Andrii Mishyn

Other members of Another Ukraine include political analyst Oleksandr Potemkin, who suggested in 2021 that Volodymyr Zelenskyy should relinquish power to Viktor Medvedchuk, journalist Oleh Yasynskyi (who lives in Chile and has criticised decommunisation in Ukraine), Olena Bronitska (who campaigned for vaccination with the Russian vaccine and used to talk up Medvedchuk), Pavel Karnazitsky (a Belarusian deported from Ukraine for anti-Ukrainian materials), Alexander Dudchak (a political strategist with a Russian passport), Kyrylo Molchanov (a 35-year-old political strategist), and Ruslan Kotsaba (accused of treason in Ukraine, now in the United States; how he managed to cross the border is unknown).

Two members of city councils have also become spokespeople for Another Ukraine:

Bohdan Hihanov (a member of Odesa City Council from the Opposition Platform – For Life faction, who admitted that he had fled Ukraine) and

Maksym Nevinchannyi (a representative of Mykolaiv City Council from Opposition Platform – For Life whose whereabouts are unknown).

Bohdan Hihanov

In total, Skhemy identified 13 spokespeople for Medvedchuk's new project. The SSU refused to answer when asked whether these individuals are involved in criminal proceedings being investigated by the special service, citing a ban on disclosing such information.

The journalists say they asked all of the individuals mentioned in the article to comment, but none of them responded.

From <https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/26/7399586/>

2015feb17 | FPRI | Russia's Use of Disinformation in the Ukraine Conflict - Foreign Policy Research Institute

By John R. Haines fpri.org

John R. Haines is the co-chair of the Eurasia Program, Executive Director of the Princeton Committee, and a member of the Board of Trustees at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. Linkto FPRI  17 feb 2015

.........EXCERPT.....

All warfare is based on deception…

To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.

Sun Tzu

We will not forget!  We will not forgive!

CyberBerkut motto

In the vanguard of the non-linear war now raging in eastern Ukraine is an old weapon, disinformation, wielded by an unconventional force.  Exemplifying that force is the hacktivist group, CyberBerkut.  It recently issued an ultimatum to Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to end the war in eastern Ukraine that “has plunged the people of Ukraine into an abyss of war, poverty, unemployment and despair.”[1]  It directed an additional threat to Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk:

“Mr. Yatsenyuk! We start the countdown. You have three days to stop what you started.  In the event our conditions are not met, we will open the world’s eyes to all that is happening in the country. Personal correspondence top officials, telephone calls, secret documents — everything that we found by hacking the computers of employees of Ukraine’s Security Service.  You decide: to stop the bloodshed in your own country and start over from scratch, or to commit public suicide in front of millions of people.”[2]

 READ FULL ARTICLE HERE   From <https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/02/russias-use-of-disinformation-in-the-ukraine-conflict/>


ANALYSIS OF Rostislav Ishchenko PERPECTIVE ABOUT 'Ukraine on the Brink: “The Guilty Blaming the Innocent”'

John R. Haines fpri.org

A Nation Must Think Before it Acts Ukraine on the Brink: “The Guilty Blaming the Innocent”

From <https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/01/ukraine-on-the-brink-the-guilty-blaming-the-innocent/>

“[A]rmed struggle…is conducted by individuals and by small groups. […] It pursues two different aims…in the first place, the struggle aims at assassinating individuals, chiefs and subordinates in the army and police…”

“The old Russian terrorism was an affair of the intellectual conspirator; today as a general rule guerrilla warfare is waged by the worker combatant, or simply by the unemployed worker…”

Vladimir Lenin (1906)

Guerrilla Warfare

“The potential for guerrilla conflict in Ukraine is very high,” says Rostislav Ishchenko[1] in a troubling account published on the Russian news portal Versiya (“Version”).[2]

A few days earlier, Ishchenko published another commentary “After New Russia” on the Russian portal Aktual’nyye kommentarii (“Urgent Commentaries”).[3]  He depicts a Ukraine at the brink, facing “growing anarchy and the real threat” that electric power generation will collapse, causing the nation’s “life support systems” — “electricity, gas, heat, sewer, water and other small pleasures that make life acceptable” — to collapse as well.  He sees Ukraine driven by the United States “to escalate the conflict” in Donetsk and Lugansk “even if it risks a rapid defeat of Kyev’s forces.”  If pro-Russian separatist militias respond in kind by mounting an offensive, Russia would be blamed, hardening the stance of the United States and European Union.  Alternately, Ukraine’s armed forces might buckle in the face of determined resistance, forcing President Poroshenko to call for an international peacekeeping force to restore order in eastern Ukraine.  Or, Ishchenko speculates, the political infighting in Kyev could provoke a putsch by Right Sector’s Ukrainian Volunteer Corps,[4] and in the resulting chaos, an international peacekeeping force would have to enter the country to restore order.  Ishchenko is hopeful, if not optimistic, that Russia might derail what he sees as the United States’ plan for Ukraine, with the most likely scenario being that civil conflict emerges elsewhere in the country in a determined effort to draw Ukraine’s armed forces away from eastern Ukraine.  

“Perhaps the Russian government will be able to roll back United States relations with the European Union and at the last minute save Russia’s head, which has already been thrust into Europe’s noose.  Russia may be able to force Ukrainian armed forces to redeploy from New Russia, especially if the combat readiness of the Odessa, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya undergrounds are even half of what is claimed.”

Ishchenko elaborates on these underground units’ combat readiness in the Versiya article, claiming pro-Russian groups have ten thousand shtykov (“bayonets”) in the Odessa region, twelve to fifteen thousand in Kharkov, and at least five thousand in Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya.  Calling them narodnych mstitieliej [5] or “people’s avengers,” Ishchenko claims many are former Ukrainian soldiers or police officers, some of whom were fired after refusing to take part in anti-terrorist operations in eastern Ukraine.

“Regularly nowadays in Ukraine, freight trains loaded with supplies for so-called “anti-terrorist operations” explode, buildings blow up in which the ultra-nationalists are meeting, and for quite some time now local officials and warlords who risk going home simply vanish.  So the guerrilla war is going full throttle.  It has not claimed many victims so far, which gives the Kyev authorities grounds to claim that that extent of the problem is being inflated.  Meanwhile, the number of arson attacks and bombings continue to grow.  Law enforcement agencies apparently can no longer cope, and the other day Odessa was forced to bring in National Guard forces to put an end somehow to vigilantism there.”[6]

By some estimates the number and severity of these incidents are increasing.  As to whether “buildings blow up,” Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council on 19 January blamed Russia for a recent explosion in Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second largest city:

“The Russian Federation continues its war against Ukraine as well as acts of terrorism committed on our territory.  In particular, the explosion in Kharkiv during which 13 people were injured, 6 of them seriously, is another example of sabotage by the Russian Federation directed against civilians.”[7]

Similar incidents have occurred in Odessa, Mariupol and Kyev.  As to Ishchenko’s exploding freight trains, on 20 January an device thought to be a mine destroyed a railway bridge near Kuhnetsovka on the border of the Zaporizhia and Donetsk regions.  It derailed a freight train and closed the rail line between Kamysh-Zarya and Rozovka, severing rail access to the port of Mariupol, where separatist units were advancing from the east.  The SBU responded by extending “counter-terrorism measures” to the Zaporizhia region.  Some believe Russia is targeting the area south and east of an arc extending from Kharkiv — “a critical industrial and communication node” in the country’s northeast — to Odessa —  “the freight gateway to Ukraine and the corridor to Transdniestria” — while it encourages separatists to engage in diversionary acts of sabotage in such Ukrainian cities as Kyev, Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk, Nikolaev, and Kherson.[8]

Ishchenko’s warning in Versiya comes only weeks after a Ukrainian weekly, Tyzhdenʹ (“The Week”), published an interview with Ukrainian parliamentarian Andriy Levus.  He claimed Ukraine was responding in-kind, with pro-government partisans operating behind separatist lines in the Donbass; and more ominously, with acts of sabotage “on the territory of the Russian Federation.”[9]  Levus is certainly in a position to speak with authority: a member of the national parliament representing the Popular Front[10] party of Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Levus is the former deputy chief of Ukraine’s internal security agency, the SBU.[11]  During the Maidan uprising against the Yanukovych government, he was the deputy head of “self-defense” forces, an umbrella group of anti-government paramilitaries.[12]

Asked by Tyzhdenʹ whether Ukraine conducts “sabotage operations, similar to what Russia is doing,” [13] Levus answered, “Often our citizens have opportunities in enemy territory.  However, we don’t issue press releases or leave Yarosh’s business card.”  The reference is to Dmytro Yarosh, the DUK Right Sector[14] leader, and to Russian claims that his business card (vizytku Yarosha) was discovered at the scene of an April 2014 shootout at a separatist checkpoint in Slovyansk.[15]  One operation for which the SBU did claim credit occurred on 22 January, when a special operations unit tagged “Dniepr-1″[16] destroyed a freight train outside the city of Sverdlovsk that was transporting coal to Russia.  The damage forced authorities to close the main rail line between the southern Luhansk region and Russia.[17]  Two days earlier, the SBU announced that it disrupted “a DNR terrorist funding scheme”[18] involving metallurgical coke (made from coal) manufactured in Makiyivkoks and Yasynivsky in the Donetsk region.  The plants are owned by Viktor Nusenkis, a Russian citizen associated with former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych.  The SBU claimed money from the sale of metallurgical coke exported illegally through a third company in Mariupol was used “to finance militants, mercenaries, and actions aimed at intimidating the civilian population.”[19]  This may have been related to a separatist attack a few days against the Avdiyievka metallurgical coke plant, the largest under Ukrainian control and “a strategic target” according to Prime Minister Yatsenyuk, the loss of which would jeopardize Ukraine’s steel production.

When Levus was asked whether he meant sabotage operations in occupied territory, he responded that while “our work [in the Donbass] continues deliberately,” “I’m talking about action in other areas where we have geopolitical interests: on the territory of the Russian Federation.”  The “SBU doers not deny conducting sabotage operations on the territory of the Russian Federation,” but “it leaves no trace.”  A December 2014 Versiya report[20] on the Tyzhdenʹ interview cited intelligence warnings about the SBU’s deployment of Chechen volunteers[21] to conduct terrorist operations inside Russia. 

Tyzhdenʹ asked Levus about the recent escalation of guerrilla activity in the Donbass and the SBU’s role in coordinating efforts there among partisan groups.

“The partisans are a people’s movement which we only help coordinate. It’s not a conventional movement in the sense of an organized group that operates in occupied territory with support, agents and so on.  Resistance groups there provide intelligence — people in occupied territory who stay behind to gather information.  Then there are units engaged in direct action, who do everything possible to reduce the occupation force’s numbers.  Then in newly liberated territory, there are volunteer units engaged in mopping up the enemy, and in counter-subversion[22] to find and eliminate enemy networks.  Those are three directions.  But to talk about a large-scale movement that is coordinated and controlled by us is an exaggeration.”[23]

It is interesting to see the contrast between Ishchenko’s perspective on the threat of Western intervention and what is for Levus, the hope of it: 

“As soon as we do our homework and strengthen our army, the world may find itself on the verge of global conflict, when the global system of checks and balances will finally start working.  But if we don’t do our homework and keep fighting, if we just wear pacifism’s rose-colored glasses, why would anyone from Alabama or England fight for us?”

While our generals spend time thinking about where to put checkpoints, Russia will grab another region from us.  We should speak frankly about the need to shift from a defensive national strategy to an offensive one.  That is the mindset that has to change.”[24]                                                                          

The deteriorating security situation in Ukraine should concern everyone.  As Lenin observed in his essay, “Guerrilla warfare is an inevitable form of struggle at a time when the mass movement has actually reached the point of an uprising and when fairly large intervals occur between the ‘big engagements’ in the civil war.”  If the next “big engagement” turns out to be a Ukrainian offensive that withers and collapses — or worse, provokes a separatist counter-offensive backed by full-scale Russian armed intervention — an already a bad situation could quickly morph into a most dangerous one.

As to the two-sided escalation we are witnessing now, Russian separatists promise sabotage and acts of terror in Ukraine’s cities, and militant Ukrainians threaten to bring the fight into Russia proper.  To this, Lenin’s concluding observation to the essay written some eleven decades ago has great relevance today:

“It is not guerrilla actions which disorganize the movement, but the weakness of a party which is incapable of taking such actions under its control.  That is why the anathemas which we Russians usually hurl against guerrilla actions go hand in hand with secret, casual, unorganized guerrilla actions…”

The unanswered question is whether either side can (or wants) to control the forces of terror each seems determined to unleash on each other, and sadly, on the hapless residents of eastern Ukraine.

“The Guilty Blaming the Innocent” is the title of a 1905 essay by Lenin published in Vperyod (“Forward”), at the time the official organ of the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party that was ancestral to the Soviet Communist Party.   

 

[1] Rostislav Ishchenko is usually identified as president of the Center for Systems [sometimes appearing as “System-based” or “Systematic”] Analysis and Forecasting.  The Center’s location is identified in published reports at Kyev, Ukraine, although Ishchenko is described in one profile as “forced to live in Moscow.” [https://en.cyplive.com/ru/news/rostislav-ischenko-soedinennye-shtaty-na-ukraine-uzhe-proigrali.html. Last accessed 19 January 2015] His commentary is notably pro-Russian — in a January 2014 interview with the online news portal The Mirror of Crimea, Ishchenko opined that “Russia has done all that is possible and even more” and “Ukraine will be turned into an anti-Russian battering ram.” [see: https://zerkalokryma.ru/lenta/people/interview/rossiya_sdelala_vso_chto_mozhno_i_dazhe_bol_she/] He is quoted approvingly in the semi-official Russian media on matters related to Ukraine, and is a contributor to Rossiya Segodnya (“Russia Today”), a Moscow-based news agency established upon the December 2013 liquidation of RIA Novosti by decree of President Putin.

[2]  “Вышли из леса” (“Out of the woods”). Versia.ru [online Russian edition, 19 January 2015].  https://versia.ru/articles/2015/jan/19/vyshli_iz_lesa. Last accessed 20 January 2015.

[3] “New Russia” or Novorossiya is the name of the proposed confederation between eastern Ukraine’s self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic, respectively.  “После Новороссии.” Актуальные комментарии [online Russian edition, 14 January 2015]. https://actualcomment.ru/posle-novorossii.html. Last accessed 19 January 2015.  “Urgent Commentaries” is an improved translation of the portal’s name on its web address, where it appears as “Actual Comment” (actualcomment.ru). 

[4] The Ukrainian Volunteer Corps is a paramilitary organization established in April 2014 by Ukraine’s Right Sector [Ukrainian: Правий сектор.  Ukrainian transl.: Pravy Sektor], a political party organized in November 2013 as a union of several far-right nationalist movements.  The Ukrainian Volunteer Corps is sometimes referred to as “DUK Right Sector” for its acronym in Ukrainian, Dobrovolʹchyy Ukrayinsʹkyy korpus.  Right Sector claims the UVC/DUK Right Sector is formally independent in deference to a legal prohibition against political parties maintaining paramilitary forces. 

[5] Russian: народных мстителей.

[6] Versia.ru, 19 January 2015, op cit.

[7] “СНБО возлагает на Россию ответственность за взрыв в Харькове” (“National Security Council holds Russia responsible for the blast in Kharkiv”). РИА Новости. [online Russian edition, 20 January 2015]. https://ria.ru/world/20150120/1043317306.html. Last accessed 21 January 2015.  The suspected grenade detonation near the Moskovsky district court in Kharkiv wounded several Right Sector activists as they left a court hearing. 

[8] “Какие города Украины наиболее подвержены угрозе терроризма?” (“What Ukrainian cities are most vulnerable to the threat of terrorism?”). Обозреватель [online Ukrainian edition, 4 January 2015]. https://obozrevatel.com/crime/32458-kakie-goroda-ukrainyi-naibolee-podverzhenyi-ugroze-terrorizma.htm. Last accessed 21 January 2015.

[9] “Андрій Левус: «Успішна постреволюційна Україна – це крах російського проекту».” (“Andriy Levus: ‘A successful post-revolutionary Ukraine would be the collapse of [Russia’s] project’.”). Тиждень.ua [online Ukrainian edition, 22 December 2014]. https://tyzhden.ua/Society/126006. Last accessed 20 January 2015.

[10] Ukrainian: Народний фронт. Ukrainian transl.: Narodnyy front.

[11] The Security Service of Ukraine [Ukrainian: Служба Безпеки України. Ukrainian transl.: Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny] is the country’s main internal security agency with responsibility for counterintelligence and anti-terrorist operations.  It is usually referred to by its Ukrainian transliteration’s acronym, SBU.  In February 2014, Levus was decreed the SBU’s deputy chief by Alexander Turchinov, the Speaker of Ukraine’s national parliament, who had earlier relieved the SBU’s 11 top-ranking officials of their duties.  See: “Andrei Levus appointed deputy head of Ukraine’s Security Service.” ITAR-TASS [online English edition, 27 February 2014]. https://itar-tass.com/en/world/721131. Last accessed 19 January 2015.

[12] Andrew Higgins (2014). “As His Fortunes Fell in Ukraine, a President Clung to Illusions.” The New York Times [online edition, 23 February 2014]. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/24/world/europe/as-his-fortunes-fell-in-ukraine-a-president-clung-to-illusions.html?_r=0. Last accessed 20 February 2015.

[13] It is notable that Tyzhden omitted this exchange from the English language version of the interview.  See: https://ukrainianweek.com/Politics/126456.

[14] See footnote (4). Yarosh was reportedly wounded in the Donbass on 21 January 2015.

[15] “‘Yarosh’s business card’ sparks new Internet meme.” Kyev Post [online English edition, 21 April 2014]. https://www.kyivpost.com/multimedia/photo/yaroshs-business-card-kremlin-propaganda-spawns-a-new-internet-meme-344412.html. Last accessed 19 January 2015.

[16] The volunteer unit was organized in the Dnipropetrovsk region in April 2014 and deployed to eastern Ukraine in late summer.

[17] “Батальон ‘Днепр-1’: Партизаны подорвали поезд, которым террористы возили уголь в Россию” (“Battalion ‘Dnepr-1′: Guerrillas blow up a train carrying terrorists’ coal to Russia”). Гордон [online Russian edition, 22 January 2015].   https://gordonua.com/news/war/Batalon-Dnepr-1-Partizany-podorvali-poezd-kotorym-terroristy-vozili-ugol-v-Rossiyu-62516.html. Last accessed 22 January 2015.

[18] The Donetsk People’s Republic is usually referred to in Ukrainian and Russian press reports as “the DNR,” the acronym of its transliterated name in Ukrainian and Russian. Ukrainian: Донецька Народна Республіка. Ukrainian transl.: Donets’ka Narodna Respublika. Russian: Донецкая Народная Республика. Russian transl.: Donétskaya Naródnaya Respúblika.

[19]  СБУ ликвидировала схему финансирования террористов через экспорт кокса” (“SBU eliminates scheme to finance terrorists through coke exports”). Гордон [online Russian edition, 20 January 2015]. https://gordonua.com/news/war/SBU-likvidirovala-shemu-finansirovaniya-terroristov-cherez-eksport-koksa-62268.html. Last accessed 22 January 2015.

[20] “Украинские спецслужбы готовят теракты в России” (“Ukraine’s intelligence agencies are preparing attacks inside Russia”). Versia.ru [online Russian edition, 22 December 2014]. https://versia.ru/articles/2014/dec/22/ukrainskie-specsluzhby-gotovyat-terakty-v-rossii. Last accessed 19 January 2015.

[21] “Chechen warriors help Ukraine to deal with Russian terrorists.” Odessa Crisis Media Center [online English edition, 24 October 2014]. https://www.odcrisis.org/en/chechen-warriors-help-ukraine-to-deal-with-russian-terrorists-2/. Last accessed 20 January 2015.  The Dzhokhar Dudayev Battallion formed in October 2013 was named for the former president of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria who in 1991 declared its independence from the Soviet Union.  Dudayev was killed in an April 1996 Russian missile strike during the First Chechen War.  There are published reports that the Dudayev Battallion is comprised of Chechens who came to Ukraine from Austria and other European Union countries where they enjoyed refugee status. [See: “В Украине против Путина и кадыровцев воюют австрийские чеченцы – СМИ” (“Austrian Chechens are fighting in Ukraine against Putin and Kadyrov’s collaborators”). Украинская правда [online Ukraine edition, 8 September 2014]. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2014/09/8/7037097/. Last accessed 19 January 2015] In later October 2014, Ukrainian President Poroshenko agreed to grant Ukrainian citizenship to foreign volunteers. [See: “Иностранцы добровольческих батальонов могут получить украинское гражданство” (“Foreigners volunteer battalions can get Ukrainian citizenship”). Гордон [online Russian edition, 31 October 2014]. https://gordonua.com/news/war/Inostrancy-dobrovolcheskih-batalonov-mogut-poluchit-ukrainskoe-grazhdanstvo-49217.html. Last accessed 19 January 2014]

[22] The SBU’s counterintelligence unit is believed to lead many of these efforts.

[23] Ibid., fn(9).

[24] Ibid., fn(9).

 

From <https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/01/ukraine-on-the-brink-the-guilty-blaming-the-innocent/>

 

John R. Haines https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-haines-28a394143/

John R. Haines is the founding chief executive officer of two companies developing proprietary technologies for fissile material detection and interdiction. In a different field altogether, he is Executive Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer of Celularity Corporation, a biotechnology company focused on cellular therapeutics and functional regenerative medicine. Haines earlier co-founded a human stem cell therapeutics company that developed what Nature ranked as the second most dominant stem cell patent estate worldwide. Beginning his career as a mathematical economist, Haines also spent time professionally in maritime operations and government. An honors graduate of Villanova University, he holds advanced degrees from the University of Pennsylvania and its Graduate School of Medicine; from Stanford University; and from King’s College London. He is a life member of both the United States Naval War College Foundation and the United States Naval Institute, and a member of the executive committee of the Friends of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Haines is a Senior Fellow of FPRI and the author of numerous essays and FPRI E-Books, and direct FPRI’s Princeton Committee.

 

Contact: eurasia@fpri.org

https://www.fpri.org/contributor/john-haines/


EX 1) Vladmir Skachko | Russia Comment: THE 5Ds of Ukrainian DESTRUCTION 

Pro-Putin Propagandist

Analysis comments by TULPPP: THIS IS BIBI

NEW Skachko — Degradation as a path of development. New six “de-” of neo-Nazi Ukraine — Ukraina.ru (Sept. 10, 2023)

Skachko's 6Ds of De-Nazifying and Destroying Ukraine (Full Article Tranlated into English) 

 Full article translated into English

Degradation as a path of development. New six "de-" of neo-Nazi Ukraine

09/10/2023 (updated: 09/11/2023) [GOOGLE TRANSLATION LINK]

By Vladimir Skachko columnist for the publication Ukraina.ru

For some time now, it has become fashionable to use the prefix “de-” in political slang. Stick it to an adjective, verb or noun and you get a new word with the opposite meaning, a negation of the old one

It’s doubly wonderful for stupid people: you don’t have to look for antonyms (especially if you don’t know what they are). As soon as Ukraine entered the slippery path of “European integration,” which implied the abandonment of previous ties and orientations and the reformatting of the country according to new models, I also supplemented myself with similar exercises. And somehow he identified the so-called five “de-” to which Ukraine has sunk.

Ukraine began to slide a long time ago, from the very beginning in 1991. The fall into the abyss of “de-” continued in 2004 during the first coup d’etat and immediately after it. And then, alas, it continued under the “bloody panda” (as the gang was called then) of President Viktor Yanukovych , who began this disastrous path in 2010 immediately after winning the presidential election.

But he was overthrown for slowness and the final insight into the disastrous course chosen in December 2013. In December he saw the light and realized that only Russia could save him, but in February 2014 he was overthrown...

SKACHKO MAKES ABSURD CLAIM ABOUT UKRAINE DOING 6Ds to ITSELF!

These five “de-” then turned out to be primitive, but, alas, obvious:

1) desovereignization - the loss of state sovereignty for the sake of the illusory benefits of staying in the European Union, which did not intend and does not intend to accept Ukraine as a full member;

2) deindustrialization - the destruction of the Ukrainian economy, which could be a competitor to the European or transnational economy;

3) depopulation - a reduction in the population, which is recognized as “excessive” for a reformatted Ukraine, primarily pensioners, the elderly and the sick;

4) de-democratization - replacing generally accepted democratic methods of forming and renewing power with technologies from electoral manipulation of election results to direct coups in the form of Maidans and “color revolutions,” of which there were two in Ukraine. Usurpation of power;

5) de-intellectualization - lowering the educational and intellectual level of the “people” by abandoning the previous education system and introducing technologies for manipulating and dumbing down the minds, primarily of the younger generations.

IN SUM TOTAL-DEGRADATION (says Skachko)

SIX  - This has all happened in recent years and continues in Ukraine, breaking all conceivable and inconceivable anti-records and reducing its entire existence to one, but the main “de-” - degradation .

***

But since it is not possible to completely remove the Ukrainian “people” (there must remain natives who would work “for their uncle” in the “liberated” and “democratized” territories and lands), then new five “de-” were needed, introduced into the heads of based on rabid zoological nationalism, in fact neo-Nazism: Ukrainian.

#1 De-Communization

After the coup d'etat in 2014, we started with the first thing - with decommunization (No. 1) . Like renouncing the harmful communist ideology and all the past associated with it. And everything was done: they forcibly erased ideologically and physically destroyed everything that in one way or another connected Ukraine with the communist past, with the communists and their communist leaders. More than 1,300 monuments to Vladimir Lenin alone were destroyed, demonstratively and symbolically. And there are countless monuments to his comrades and other various Leninists.

#2 De-Sovietazation

Then they cast the net wider and began de-Sovietization (No. 2) - the eradication of memory generally associated with the Soviet past and everything that constituted the spiritual foundations of Ukrainian Soviet society. First of all, the achievements that were the moral basis of the life of society went under the knife. For example, the memory of the Great Patriotic War of the entire Soviet people (1941–1945), in which up to 7 million residents of Ukraine died defending their homeland.

In their place came new “heroes” - nationalist collaborators from the OUN* and UPA*, who served the German Nazis, but allegedly fought for an independent Ukraine. And of all the achievements of the Ukrainian people during the period from 1918 to 1991, not the first place came not from industrialization, which brought Ukraine into the category of advanced powers, but from the famine of 1932–1933, promoted and imposed on the public consciousness as “genocide of the Ukrainian people.”

#3 De-Colonization

Further - wider and deeper. When the purely visual symbols of the communist and Soviet past were finished, decolonization (No. 3) came next - a depiction of the entire previous history of Ukraine as part of the Russian Empire (since 1654), and then as part of the USSR (since 1922) as the history of its colonization and deprivation or obstruction of the creation of their own statehood. As part of this process, they even propose to make Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky, who was the first to create the Ukrainian state on the world map, a victim of “decolonization.” But he not only created, but in the situation that arose in the middle of the 17th century, he concluded an alliance with the Russian state and entered it with the rights of the broadest autonomy, which was then squandered and squeezed out for their own benefits by all his followers. This is the real outline of history, but the new rulers of the unfortunate country propose to consider it the “colonization of Ukraine” and therefore “decolonize” everything.

#4 De-Russificaiton

The imaginary violent and deliberate deliverance from “colonial dependence” is natural and organic, but just as violently it develops into de-Russification (No. 4). Total and hopeless. Instilled from bottom to top in all spheres of life - from preschool and school education to communication in everyday life, top of which may well be the idea of ​​​​creating so-called “language commissars” who would monitor the use of the Russian language in the service sector, in schools, on the streets, in in public places. And who could fine for communicating in “dog language,” that is, in Russian. This is where all these calls come from not just to ban the Russian language, but also to withdraw, destroy, squeeze out of the country, and declare Russian-speaking and Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine second-class citizens. 

#5 De-Christianization

And then they also took on the soul, faith and thoughts. A process has begun that can well be called “Orthodox de-Christianization” (No. 5) - attempts to forcibly not only tear out believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) from under the canonical and organizational influence of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and create, having achieved its canonical recognition, some kind of autocephalous Orthodox Church on the basis of the already de facto existing UOC with its own “Kiev Patriarchate”, also not recognized by anyone. It was created in 2018 in the form of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), which in January 2019 even received a tomos (certificate of autocephaly) from Istanbul from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, an ex-captain of the Turkish army under the influence of the CIA.

Today, many are sure: they want to gradually replace Orthodoxy in Ukraine with Uniateism - a cross between the Catholic and Orthodox faiths. She, a crossbreed, was considered a means of colonizing the Orthodox world in eastern Europe (including the lands of present-day Ukraine) since the signing of the so-called religious Union of Brest in 1596. Through slow, but systematic and persistent Catholic proselytism, the Uniate plays exactly the same role now. “Catholic Christmas” in Orthodox Ukraine has already been declared a public holiday and a day off. And this status has been removed from the Orthodox Nativity. And this is accompanied by long-familiar tales that if Ukrainians had accepted Catholicism, which glorifies the pragmatism of man, and not Orthodoxy, which cares more about the soul rather than the body, then they would live well-fed and prosperously, as in the West, and not beggars and -slavishly humiliated, as in “Orthodox Mordor”...

And the result of this approach to Ukraine by external curators and inspirers is already noticeable. The common Christian faith is being destroyed and replaced by new sects, cults and beliefs (from the pagan ancients to the new mental research of the rogues).

#6 De-Humanization

And when the destruction of the spiritual is added to the destruction of the material, then the general degradation is also complemented by general dehumanization (No. 6). And it also risks becoming complete and irreversible. And the history of mankind, alas, knows the death of civilizations, not to mention the nations and peoples who lost their way and got lost in self-deception and cleverly planted lies.

RUSSIA'S OPERATION HAS EXPOSED ALL THESE DE-STRUCTIVE PROCESSES brought about Ukrainians against themselves

The special military operation (SVO) of Russia in Ukraine has completely exposed all the negative processes, but is designed to stop the processes of degradation with which all these eleven “de-” have merged. However, everyone is now deciding how Ukraine will remain, having already been turned into anti-Russia - dis-Ukraine, if linguistic research continues...

* Recognized as extremist and its activities are prohibited in Russia.

 

From <https://ukraina-ru.translate.goog/20230910/1049301611.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp>

EX 2) Ishchenko Rostilav | Turn Ukraine into Depopulated Rump State 

Pro-Putin Propagandist "Analyst"

Ishchenko Rostilav: Turn Ukraine into Depopulated Rump State

NEW Ishchenko -– On the issue of the post-war structure of Ukraine – Ukraina.ru (Sept. 11, 2023)

POST WAR UKRAINE

We will not be able to control post-war Ukraine. 

OPTIONS

We have the following positions:

1. In the next six months to a year, the West is going to withdraw from the Ukrainian war and conclude a compromise peace with Russia on the condition of maintaining a reduced Ukraine.

2. For Russia, preserving Ukraine will mea

3. There is no guarantee that it will be possible to repeat the SVO in the foreseeable future to finish off the surviving Ukraine. Most likely, this possibility will be completely blocked politically by the West during peace negotiations (for example, by issuing overlapping guarantees or by admitting Ukraine to NATO).

4. The window of opportunity to destroy the Ukrainian state by military means will be open until the spring of next year. 

From here we come to a simple conclusion:

---see translation and bio below


For updated information, continue to this tracker: 

Russia's Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection

2023sep11 Ishchenko Rostilav Makes Case for Liquidation of Ukraine (not merely a Rump Kiev State)

 Full article translated into English

Opinion: Ishchenko Rostilav On the issue of the post-war structure of Ukraine


[google translation link 09/11/2023 ]    (Rostilav's Bio attached at bottom of this article)

by  Rostislav Ishchenko (author of the Opinion article in Ukraina.ru)

In fact, war and the army waging war are only instruments of politics. It is not the military, but the politicians who decide when the war should start, as well as when and how to end it. 

TENSION BETWEEN MILITARY AND POLITICAL LEADERSHIP

Therefore, politicians and military personnel often disagree on the method of warfare, the goals and timing of the campaign, as well as on the terms on which a post-war peace can be concluded. 

The military sees in front of them an enemy that it is desirable to destroy completely and forever. 

Politicians start from a more complex scheme, in which yesterday's enemy may turn out to be tomorrow's ally. 

One of Bismarck's most outstanding achievements, his main victory was not the defeat of France and the proclamation of the Second Reich, but the transformation of Austria-Hungary from Prussia's rival into its ally and junior partner. It was thanks to this political maneuver that the victory over France and the creation of the German Empire, under the leadership of the Prussian king, became possible.

For many years, right up to the beginning of the Northern Military District, Russian policy in the post-Soviet space in general and in the Ukrainian direction in particular was similar in its goals to Bismarck’s policy towards Austria-Hungary. 

PRESERVING MOSCOW'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE | NON-MILITARY OPTIONS

Moscow, without encroaching on the political independence of the relinquished territories, sought to turn them into reliable military-political allies and economic partners.

For this, the interests of foreign Russians were sacrificed; for this, Russia made serious economic and political concessions. For this purpose, the CSTO was created, within the framework of which Moscow actually assumed the obligation to ensure the protection of the fallen territories from external threats, despite the fact that the allies’ reciprocal obligations were not worth the paper on which they were written and were openly violated.

For this reason, for decades they tried to breathe life into the amorphous organism of the CIS, half-dead from birth, which was essentially the same CSTO, only in the economic field. By the way, let me remind you that the CIS was originally conceived as an organization with unified armed forces.

This idea of ​​​​replacing a union state with a union of states was not eliminated until the beginning of the Northeast Military District, which was initially seen from Moscow as assistance to the “healthy forces” in Ukraine in returning the power taken from them by the Nazi putschists and the joining of Kyiv to the union of Moscow and Minsk in any (bilateral or multilateral) format.

MILITARY OPTIONS - WAR

But war is not only a great destroyer, but also a great sobering agent. What in peacetime is nothing more than a set of theoretical constructs and can be discussed for any length of time without getting even a millimeter closer to the truth, during war it is immediately verified by practice.

Allowing yourself to maintain a delusion about the nature of your political opponent during a war is guaranteed to lose the war. That is why, having encountered unexpected fierce resistance in Ukraine, Russia was forced to reconsider not only the initial concept of the North Military District, but also the hitherto dominant idea of ​​​​the form of organization of the post-Soviet space.

Many did not notice, but if earlier Moscow tried to work with neighboring countries with the help of institutions specially created for this purpose (CIS, CSTO, etc.), then in the last year and a half almost nothing has been heard about the active role of these entities, and the main mechanisms of interaction with neighboring countries have been transferred to the standard international level. The term “near abroad” itself has practically fallen out of use. Work with the relevant states is carried out within the framework of the standard mechanisms of the “Great Game”; the main efforts have been transferred to the platforms of joint Russian-Chinese structures created to counter the United States, as well as to balance and promote the interests of Moscow and Beijing, initially in Eurasia, and now throughout planet.

The design of the SVO has also changed. There was no official renaming, but state propaganda stopped avoiding the term “war” in relation to this operation. This is understandable, initially, when the Northern Military District was more thought of as a military demonstration in support of the internal Ukrainian opposition to the Nazi regime, the term “war”, which had too strong a semantic load, was politically flawed - a liberation campaign cannot be a war. But the liberation campaign cannot last almost two years and be accompanied by the death at the front of hundreds of thousands of liberated people who fought against liberation.

Having officially recognized that the Americans and their allies have unleashed a proxy war against us, the mechanism and striking force of which is Ukraine, we de facto recognized Kyiv as a party fighting against us. The official preservation of the term SVO allows us to maintain some beneficial restrictions on military action. In particular, the United States and its allies are forced to generally comply with the requirement to exclude Russian territory (within the borders they recognize) from full-fledged combat operations. But, apparently, in the near future this restriction will also become history.

Already now, the territory of Russia (within the borders recognized by the West) is being shelled, enemy DRGs are entering it, and the absence of a direct invasion by the Ukrainian Armed Forces can be explained more by a lack of potential for carrying out serious operations and a reluctance to lengthen the front line than by actual compliance with any restrictions. Ukraine is receiving increasingly long-range weapons from the West, and as the military-political catastrophe in Kyiv approaches, Ukrainian politicians are increasingly shifting their stakes from the immediate military sphere to the political-psychological sphere, no longer counting on victory on the battlefield, but on undermining the spirit of the Russian people .

***

For this purpose, the adventurous concept of “transferring the war” to Russian territory was adopted, which involves not only missile and drone strikes on military targets and political centers in the depths of Russia, but also a direct invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Today, Kyiv is stopped only by its inability to organize such an invasion due to the lack of forces and means among the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Nevertheless, Ukraine will try not only to continue terrorist attacks on Russian territory by Ukrainian DRGs and shelling of civilians, but also to intensify them. Terror against civilians is the last straw of the Nazi regime.

However, only Kyiv believes in terror as a means of salvation. Even the Western partners of the Ukrainian government - the main beneficiaries of the ongoing hostilities - have already realized that victory over Russia within the framework of the Ukrainian crisis will not be achieved and it is necessary to think about the format of a post-war settlement. The West’s task will be to prevent Russia from consolidating its military-political success at the negotiating table and diplomatically winning back what it has lost.

TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY

Many of our citizens say: 

“Just think, there will be some piece of land left with almost no population, no economy, and only debts. Well, let. Who are they dangerous to?” 

The Americans would never have thrown Ukraine into the war against Russia if it were not for the all-conquering kleptomania and inability for state building of the Ukrainian ruling elite. Ukrainian rulers stole Ukraine from themselves and sold it at retail for cheap, only by doing this forcing the Americans to throw this asset into the furnace of war. Without war, a devastated Ukraine would become too burdensome—more would have to be spent on its maintenance than the damage caused to Russia by the existence of such a Ukraine.

And it was somehow inconvenient when, right on the borders of prosperous Russia, the West’s main partner in the post-Soviet space was begging—some kind of anti-advertising. 

And so we can say that if not for the military pogrom, Ukraine would have been the most prosperous state in Eastern, and perhaps Western Europe. That is, the West has nothing to do with it anymore - “Russia is to blame.”

REDUCED POST-WAR UKRAINE

In a reduced post-war Ukraine, the West will have the opportunity to reassemble the elite and place it under more reliable control, since its “right” to power will be directly dependent on Western support. 

they feed themselves and are always ready to fight against Russia (the idea of ​​revenge), if only they supply weapons. A surviving, albeit reduced, Ukraine will be a source of permanent dual loyalty within Russia. I'm not talking about outright disloyalty. 

It's unpleasant, but you can fight it. I’m talking about double loyalty, which we saw during the collapse of the USSR in the example of the population of the Union republics, when it turned out that for the majority their regional decision-making center turned out to be more important than the all-Union one.

Making Case for Liquidation - Dual Loyalty

Until the crisis happened, no one noticed this double loyalty, but in times of crisis it turned out to be one of the most important reasons for the collapse. 

It’s not that the population of the republics was for the disintegration - they were not against it. The reason was that their own authorities were preserved, at first nothing changed, except that the capital, and with it the government, were closer, which was even considered by many as a good thing.

The presence of a second “own” state for former citizens of Ukraine, along with Russia, is a source of potential double loyalty. 

So far, everything is fine in Russia; absolute loyalty to Moscow is maintained, but if any grievances, contradictions arise, or the country finds itself in crisis, some people may “remember” that they are “Ukrainians.” The consequences will depend on the depth of the crisis, but one thing is certain - any crisis will strengthen such dual loyalty.

Even in quiet times, the presence of another political center will be an incentive to compare. 

There will always be dissatisfied people who always feel bad at home. That is, on our borders there will be an organizational center of destructive domestic Russian opposition, connected with us by thousands of family ties, and on our territory there will be a couple of million people who served this alternative center, fought for it, lost, but it is not a fact that they have resigned themselves, although outwardly and submitted.

POST WAR UKRAINE

We will not be able to control post-war Ukraine. 

OPTIONS

We have the following positions:

1. In the next six months to a year, the West is going to withdraw from the Ukrainian war and conclude a compromise peace with Russia on the condition of maintaining a reduced Ukraine.

2. For Russia, preserving Ukraine will mea

3. There is no guarantee that it will be possible to repeat the SVO in the foreseeable future to finish off the surviving Ukraine. Most likely, this possibility will be completely blocked politically by the West during peace negotiations (for example, by issuing overlapping guarantees or by admitting Ukraine to NATO).

4. The window of opportunity to destroy the Ukrainian state by military means will be open until the spring of next year. 

From here we come to a simple conclusion:

But war is a thousand accidents, so we won’t swear and throw our caps into the air in advance. 

One thing is certain: 

if this task is not solved for some reason, it will become much more difficult to ensure the fulfillment of the stated goals of the North Military District by military means, and Russia’s political position will worsen.

Understanding all this, the Americans are waiting for our offensive, preparing for it and will try to disrupt it, including through political maneuvering. 


RELATED Rostislav Ishchenko: who is he - Political scientist

---GOOGLE translation of article into English

BIOGRAPHY Ishchenko Rostislav Vladimirovich, Political Scientist

Ishchenko Rostislav Vladimirovich was born on December 29, 1965 in Kiev.

After school, he served his military service as a private in the Soviet Army in the Strategic Missile Forces in the BSSR.

Graduated with honors from the Faculty of History of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv State University.

SOURCE https://ukraina-ru.translate.goog/20230227/1043912675.html?in=t&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp


Propagandists · Ukrainian and Russian political scientist, diplomat, columnist for MIA "Russia Today" · Пропагандисты · Украинский и российский политолог, дипломат, обозреватель МИА «Россия сегодня» · Український та російський політолог, дипломат, оглядач МІА «Росія сьогодні»

SOURCE:https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q19413936/


speaker - https://valdaiclub.com/about/experts/274/

Valdai Discussion Club Conference Hall address: 16/1 Tsvetnoy Boulevard St., Moscow, Russia, 127051 Phone: +7 (495) 734-72-77 Email: admin@valdaiclub.com

Founded by The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC) is a non-profit academic and diplomatic think tank that was founded by the Russian Federation Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Education and Science in 2010. RIAC activities are aimed at strengthening peace, friendship and solidarity between peoples, preventing international conflicts and promoting conflict resolution and crisis settlement. 


#YIKES!!! - Example of U.S. Military speaking on Russian Propaganda Network - Retired US Army Major General Paul Vallely, Chairman of Stand Up America Foundation [video valdaiclub - 2017?], talks about the evolution of US President Donald Trump from businessman to President and the new role of the United States as it disengages from its previous interventionist role in the Middle East. According to Vallely, it will take time for the United States to develop a new comprehensive strategy, in which issues in East Asia and illegal immigration over the Mexican border will play a greater role than the Middle East. He also noted that differences between Russia and the United States regarding Iran are possible to resolve over time. 


More articles by Ischenko  pro-putin propaganda


2017dec07 Ishchenko (Pro-Putin) Expert warns Kiev will wreck Minsk accords due to feud amongst Ukraine’s elite

The issue of settling the Donbass crisis has been stuck in the mud since the Ukrainian elite completely missed their chances in 2015 and 2016 to put these peace agreements into practice

7 Dec 2017 Source TASS From <https://tass.com/world/979677> Ukraine crisis

MOSCOW, December 7. /TASS/. A deep crisis plaguing the Ukrainian establishment will not let Kiev launch a full-fledged implementation of the Minsk accords, President of the Center for System Analysis and Forecasting Rostislav Ishchenko told a round table at the TASS News Agency on Thursday.

"Let’s be clear that these agreements will never be implemented simply because the moment when Ukraine could have fulfilled them has already passed," the expert noted. "And so, these agreements are an element of a global game, an element of international bargaining with the US, an element that offers the opportunity for them to drag their feet, but not an element of practical implementation," Ischenko explained.

He noted that the issue of settling the Donbass crisis has been stuck in the mud since the Ukrainian elite completely missed their chances in 2015 and 2016 to put these peace agreements into practice.

"Groups within the Ukrainian elite have plunged into a deep standoff among themselves for different reasons, and have been actively working to rattle the authority of [President Pyotr] Poroshenko for a third month running. Even former President of Georgia [Mikhail Saakashvili] pledges to send Pytor Alekseyevich into oblivion before the start of 2018," Ishchenko said.

Tags

From <https://tass.com/world/979677>

 

 

2015Mar03 Ishchenko (Pro-Putin) Deescalating the Conflict in Ukraine

23.03.2015

Rostislav Ishchenko | vaidaclub source

Interview with Rostislav Ishchenko, President of the Center for System Analysis and Forecasting.

What could you say about the recent statement by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on the recent de-escalation of the conflict in Donbass? Is this really happening? Will Kiev fully comply with the Minsk agreements? We hear continuous reports that Ukraine is building up its military strength with Western help. Will you, please, comment on the EU and US roles in this respect.

Poroshenko is saying what he is supposed to say, but even he doesn’t seem to believe it. First, Ukraine does not conceal the fact that it will only accept one end to the Donbass problem – the surrender of the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics. However, to achieve this, Kiev must win militarily, which it obviously cannot do no matter how many people it drafts or how much equipment its army receives. It cannot win even with Western supplies, which aren’t expected in the near future anyway. To sum up, Kiev is unable to win but must continue the war because the Kiev regime cannot exist without it. The war is delaying the inevitable socio-economic collapse of the country and justifies the terrorist methods used to run it. This is the only thing allowing the regime to pretend that there is national unity and that the situation in the country is under control.

There can be no doubt that the United States has an interest in the war in Ukraine lasting as long as possible and being as bloody and destructive as possible, but Washington does not want to use its resources on propping up the Kiev regime that has no choice other than to prosecute the war. So, Kiev will be pushed to step up its military activities but won’t be helped (except with kind words).

As for the EU, it is irreparably divided. The United Kingdom, Poland, and the collective Baltic limitrophe take a pro-American, Russophobic position and are going all-out to escalate the confrontation with Russia. Italy, Greece, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and some other states are strong supporters of the EU conducting its own policy independent of Washington and pursuing European rather than US interests. France and Germany are hesitant, but recently they have been increasingly inclined to accept the need for normalizing relations with Russia. True, they are still trying to avoid a quarrel with America, but they will have to make a choice, and there is reason to believe they will choose Russia.

Can elections be held in some territories of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions? How might the assertion of their special status affect the situation in Ukraine? What if some other regions follow the example of the DPR and the LPR?

Elections in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions are unrealistic. As I’ve said, Kiev is not going to comply with the Minsk agreements. In other words, war is becoming inevitable. It is the only way the sides can resolve their irreconcilable contradictions. This is why the Ukrainian authorities will do whatever they can to shift the blame for wrecking the peace process to the DPR, LPR and Russia.

As for other regions of Ukraine (the eight regions of Novorossiya), they have wanted to follow the example of Crimea rather than the DPR and the LPR since March 2014. When regional administration buildings were occupied last March, the Russian tricolor was hoisted above them. Only when it became obvious that Russia wouldn’t intervene militarily did all kinds of “people’s republics” with their own symbols start to emerge. I think they are temporary entities, but that does not mean there should be only two. Kiev has alienated everyone in the past year. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a Lvov or a Ternopol people’s republic. Of course, they would have the opposite ideology of the DPR and the LPR, but Kiev already enjoys no more prestige in Galicia than in Donbass.

Can Kiev make concessions or compromise with southeastern Ukraine?

No, it’s impossible. Admitting that compromise is possible at this point would mean admitting that everything was in vain – the war, the tens of thousands of deaths, the destruction of the national economy and even the 2014 armed coup and the formation of the terrorist Nazi regime. That would only lead to the question of responsibility, which rests with those who are currently in power. But they have made such a mess that life imprisonment and the confiscation of property (if they survive to stand trial) would be a mild punishment. So Kiev will fight to the end – its own rapidly approaching end.

How should Russia react if the Minsk agreements are violated by Kiev or Donbass?

Russia is already reacting. It is citing violations of the agreements by Kiev and urging Paris and Berlin as their guarantors to respond. As for the future, we’ll have to wait and see. When the war resumes, we should play it by ear based on the outcome of the fighting.

What do you predict will happen in Ukraine? What is the most realistic scenario today?

There is nothing good in store for Ukraine. I think during this year it will sustain a military defeat and the disintegration of its army, another coup and the collapse of what is left of its government agencies, all-out chaos, the total destruction of the economy and the start of subsistence farming for survival. The country is in for a humanitarian catastrophe that practically no one is able to avert. The only thing left is to try and mitigate its consequences. But to do this, the territory of modern Ukraine must be occupied by an outside force capable of maintaining police order, or the DPR and the LPR self-defense forces must be powerful enough to occupy the entire territory, defeat Makhnovism and criminal rule and start developing the economy from scratch, of course with foreign support. In other words, without outside support no more than half of Ukraine’s current population will survive after the imminent, final collapse of the state. Survivors will be set back a century in terms of living standards and civilization. This is why foreign intervention to restore law and order to Ukraine after the collapse of Project Ukraine will be inevitable.

From <https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/deescalating_the_conflict_in_ukraine/>

 

Rostislav Ishchenko: The Ukrainian elite was formed as a Comprador, even worse than a Comprador

11 Feb 2024 | Pravda English Link | Citing Source: https://ukraina.ru

The Ukrainian elites deny the state as a value, they are initially atomized, they initially live in the "every man for himself" mode, and some external force holds them back. That's why they all ran constantly – some to Moscow, some to Washington, some to Brussels, and said, let's be independent, but you will ensure our stability.

About why it is impossible to say for sure about the growth of nationalist sentiments in Kazakhstan, why the Russian Il-76 shot down by the Ukrainian Air Force with Ukrainian prisoners of war on board was "forgotten" in the West and in Ukraine, and what actually happened to the Ukrainian elites.<url> was told by a political scientist and columnist for the publication Ukraine.<url> Rostislav Ishchenko.

– Rostislav Vladimirovich, one of the main news is Tucker Carlson's interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I am interested in the importance of this precedent, because some say that there is too much hype around this story. Is this so, can the arrival of at least one of the Western media people really affect anything, and why did this visit cause such a big stir in the West?

– What do you mean, were there no precedents? Presidents are constantly giving interviews to someone, and foreign journalists are constantly being interviewed. On the eve of visits, interviews are almost mandatory, at least very often.

Recently, due to the fact that the West has taken Russia out of the brackets of the civilized world, Western journalists have not interviewed Russian political figures, and in this sense, of course, interest in Carlson's interview with Putin is out of the general trend, and therefore caused corresponding outrage in the West, the European Union even proposes to introduce Carlson sanctions.

As for the hype here – when some unknown football player arrives, the whole country is on its ears too. After all, Carlson is a person working in the information space, well-known in this space, and even in order to disperse the interview for reading so that there would be more interest in it, the hype around Carlson's personality does not bother anyone.

Why did you come? – I came to take an interview. – Who should I borrow from? – Take it from Putin. – Did you take it? – I took it. – Well, let's read it.

– A question about the situation in Kazakhstan. The President dismissed the Prime Minister and the entire Cabinet. What could have happened, or is this the natural finale of cleaning the system from Nazarbayev's cadres?

– I do not know what could happen in Kazakhstan if the entire Cabinet was dismissed, I do not think that this is a purge of personnel, because there was already a lot of time to purge personnel. If there were any complaints against the government, then, probably, they should have been voiced.

If these are some hidden claims that everyone knows about, but everyone always knows about it in Kazakhstan, and not outside it, so I can't say anything about it, that they were dismissed there, or not.

– What is the current state of relations between Russia and Kazakhstan? There are constantly videos condemning Russians, as they were in Ukraine at one time, so far small, local, but, nevertheless, the trend is such that there are more and more of them.

– Firstly, so far small local videos condemning Russians from Kazakhstan have been running for thirty years. Nationalists have been in power in Kazakhstan since 1991, and Nazarbayev balanced as much as he could, but did not remove or drive them from power. It is quite understandable that Kazakhstan is in exactly the same position as all other post-Soviet states. It is part of the former system.

Russian Russians were also numerous in Kazakhstan, more than Kazakhs, at least as of the late nineties, then their number decreased because many Russians left Kazakhstan, including those who left under pressure.

Nevertheless, there are still a lot of Russians there, in northern Kazakhstan they live locally, in their ancestral territories, and, in my opinion, they still make up the majority there. Therefore, naturally, in Kazakhstan they see Kazakh nationalists as a counterweight to Russian influence.

BELARUS

As for how many or few of these videos there are, I do not know, because we are still hearing the assessment of the Russian public, and the Russian public is like this:

today Lukashenko is going to Europe – all Belarusians are enemies, tomorrow Lukashenko did not have a coup d'etat and he is already friends with Russia – all Belarusians are friends. Yesterday they fought with the Chechens and it was necessary to drop an atomic bomb on them, today the Chechens are fighting for Russia – they are good fellows, heroes, etc.

Public opinion flows very quickly from one to the other, and it is enough to show a couple of some situations of a clash on ethnic grounds in Kazakhstan, where Russians are insulted, and the corresponding public opinion will be formed.

I can say for sure that in the nineties, Russians in Kazakhstan were worse off than they are now, because they fled from there, and fled under pressure, and fled quite massively – there were many of them coming to Russia. Russia did not react to this in any way, Kazakhstan was a friend, a brother, and everything was fine with him.

There are no Russians fleeing Kazakhstan now. There are Russians who oppose Kazakh nationalism in Kazakhstan, there are Kazakhs who oppose Kazakh nationalism – this is natural, not all Kazakhs are nationalists.

There are certain videos, in the nineties there were no smartphones for everyone to film everything that happens around them – now they are, so the number of videos on social networks has increased. In the nineties, there were no social networks themselves. Therefore, there is more attention to these videos.

In order to assess whether there are more videos, the situation in Kazakhstan is worse, whether it is better – for this you need to have clear statistics. No one has it.

In Kazakhstan, they say that everything is fine with them, especially the Kazakhs. Russians living in Kazakhstan say that everything is fine and everything is fine, others say that everything is terrible.

They don't go there from Russia at all. We can assess, for example, some actions, the interests of the Kazakh government, but it is impossible to assess the living situation while in Moscow, St. Petersburg or Vladivostok - you need to feel with your hands and see.

UKRAINE comparison Kazakhsan

Moreover, even in Ukraine at one time, people could live in the same city and assess the situation in the country in completely different ways. The same thing happens there.

Therefore, it is still impossible to talk about the growth or decrease of nationalist sentiments. Kazakhstan's policy has not changed in all this time. Kazakhstan has always maintained a balance in politics, it tried to balance its economic interests in Russia somewhat with its political friendship with Great Britain and the United States, they received oil and gas concessions on its territory. That is, he tried to balance Russia economically, but, nevertheless, he was always in the wake of Russian rather than American politics.

Kazakhstan was actually the locomotive of the creation of the EurAsEC, if it were not for Kazakhstan, then there would be no one to create the EurAsEC with. Ukraine fell off immediately, even from the Customs Union, Belarus was already in a single state, which is unclear where the one is, where the state is, and where the two states are.

Kazakhstan actually turned out to be the third member, thanks to which integration in the post-Soviet space actually continued, and even expanded. But even now he is not going to leave these systems, he works with Russia, helps to overcome sanctions somewhere, earns money from this, just as Belarus earned from shrimps and all other seafood and other Belarusian goods.

Somewhere his economic interests with Russia diverge, somewhere Kazakhstan is under pressure and he bends under pressure, because it is also clear - his shirt is closer to his body, it is necessary to protect his interests.

I cannot say that we have super-bad relations with Kazakhstan, it is impossible to compare it with Ukraine, because in Ukraine the state government initially, since the nineties, set the task of "away from Russia".

"Get rid of Russia" has been the slogan of state power for thirty years. I do not hear such things in Kazakhstan that the state authorities, not individual numerous nationalists, namely, that the state authorities speak with such slogans. Kazakhstan does not train the army in the war with Russia, and the army was based on this in Ukraine.

From the very first days of the creation of an independent Ukrainian state, Major General Mulyava, who immediately jumped from sergeant to general, was appointed head of some ideological direction in the Ministry of Defense, which is already missing, disappeared along with Mulyava, and all officers who expressed a desire to serve in Ukraine passed through him, and asked everyone one question: "Are you ready to fight with Russia"?

Neither with Belarus, nor with Romania, nor with Poland, these are also border countries, nor with Moldova. Belarus and Moldova are also former Soviet states. Namely, with Russia. The Ukrainian army was built on this.

The Kazakh army conducts joint exercises with Russia, Kazakhstan and Russia together in the CSTO. Yes, this organization is quite amorphous, but not everyone in NATO is going to defend the Baltic States either.

Therefore, Russia is not following the path of signing military alliances now, it turns out that at the end of the twentieth and in the twenty-first century military alliances, the document on military alliance is not binding. The country decides for itself. It was the same before.

The country decides for itself whether to fulfill its obligations under this document or not. It proceeds at the time of the crisis from the status quo. Therefore, we do not have a formal document with China, and the military alliance is much more durable than with the CSTO, although we say that we do not have a military alliance – there is no document, we did not sign anything, we are just friends at home and sometimes conduct joint exercises.

Kaza different people immediately began to fight all against all at the same time. The only thing that stabilized them was: "we focus on Moscow, so we go to Moscow, fall at our feet, and say: Sovereign, appoint us a hetman, tell us who is dearer to your heart, and we will obey him, we will not love him, we will hate him with fierce hatred, we will sit up to him We will run to you, tell you how he is cheating on you, but please appoint a hetman so that we know that he is in charge until you change mercy to anger."

And another crowd came to Washington in the same way, and said:

"Look how beautiful and democratic I am, how I love America, how I love the West, let me govern Ukraine, or I will represent that part of Ukraine that is oriented towards Western values, let me be the most important there. Take it and tell us – we appreciate this one the most, he is the best you have."

That's how Yushchenko is the greatest banker of our time, the most, the most, he was like that exactly as long as the Americans needed him, so everyone forgot about his greatness, not a single bank invited this magnitude to work for him. I would have taken a Swiss or American bank and invited the best banker of our time. They don't invite you.

They also mark others. Yatsenyuk was also the greatest democrat of our time, Poroshenko was someone, I don't remember anymore. Each of them at the moment of his rise – the West hung a mark on him:

"This is our favorite politician, we need to focus on him."

They still run to them like that.

They did not abandon Russia, they either reformatted or threw away everything that was pro-Russian, now politicians who focus on Russia, on which they dream of restoring Ukraine, they live in Moscow, it is even more convenient for them to go to the Kremlin.

True, they are not always allowed there, but they can get closer – you can come up, knock on the gate, ask: "Is it possible today or not"? And with the same thing:

"Let's occupy Ukraine, give it to us, appoint me hetman, I will govern, I will be good."

Only those who focused on the United States remained in Ukraine, and the United States says:

 "And we are not going to appoint anyone anymore, let them flounder as they want."

That's it, freedom! Now everyone, to the best of their abilities and abilities, can make their way to the Hetmans themselves – a continuous Wild field.

Maybe they would like to have someone appointed to them, but no one wants to appoint them. And they themselves cannot agree with each other, because everyone is fighting for themselves.

Source: https://ukraina.ru

From <https://pravda-en.com/usa/2024/02/11/314023.html>


#Compilation | Examples of ELIMINATIONIST LANGUAGE against Ukrainians

by Russian Officials

Intention to Commit Crime | GENOCIDAL RHETORIC | Examples

Source: Just Security with mark-ups by TULPPP

⏩[GOOGLE DOC VERSION] Intent to commit Genocide: Russian Eliminationist (genocidal) language against Ukraine

Russian Rhetoric of Genocide

Russia’s Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection Updated With the Latest, JustSecurity

Markups & Highlights by TULPPP

source: Russia's Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection | JustSecurity [link to original article] published - 

February 14, 2023 by Clara Apt [regularly updated]

filed under | genocide, Rhetoric, Russia-Ukraine War, Translation Available, Vladimir Putin, War Crimes

(Editor’s note: This article, originally published on June 6 and updated previously, is now updated to add new instances of eliminationist rhetoric by State Duma members Boris Chernyshov and Vyacheslav Molotov, Deputy Dean of world politics at Moscow State University, Director of the Institute of Contemporary Studies at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Oleg Karpovich, political scientist Rostislav Ishchenko, war correspondent Dmitry Steshin, and more. New material is noted in red as “New” or “Updated.” Ця стаття також доступна українською тут.)

Long before Russian President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale assault on Ukraine in February and even prior to his 2014 invasion and capture of Crimea, analysts noted with alarm a different kind of escalation – the threatening rhetoric against Ukraine by Putin and actors within his control. Dating at least to 2008 or 2009, increasingly hostile language laid the groundwork for rejecting Ukraine’s existence as a state, a national group, and a culture.

What follows is a compilation of publicly available statements (readers are invited to submit by email any that we may have missed).

Experts such as Francine Hirsch, a professor of history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and author of “Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg,” have pointed to such language as evidence of genocidal intent toward the Ukrainian people. Whether and how the concept of “genocide” applies to Russia’s campaign against Ukraine is the subject of debate, notwithstanding the reference in Article II of the Genocide Convention to “the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such.” A related issue under discussion is a concept often referred to as “cultural genocide,” which generally connotes the intentional destruction of a group’s identity even in the absence of mass killings. “These calls for ‘de-Ukrainization’ are an incitement to genocide: to ‘destroy, in whole or in part,’ the Ukrainian nation,” Hirsch wrote in April. And Yale University history professor Timothy Snyder, in reference to the same article in the Russian outlet RIA Novosti that prompted Hirsch’s conclusion, wrote, “Russia has just issued a genocide handbook for its war on Ukraine.”

Beth Van Schaack, U.S. ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice, said in a May 2022 hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in response to a question about the Russian atrocities coming to light in Ukraine, “Some of the genocidal rhetoric that we’re hearing out of Russia is extremely worrying.”

A report from the New Lines Institute and the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights concludes that “Russia bears State responsibility for breaches of Article II and Article III (c) of the Genocide Convention,” and “that that there exists undoubtedly a very serious risk of genocide, triggering States’ duty to prevent under Article I of the Genocide Convention.” Among the evidence the report cites is a range of statements that it says constitute “direct and public incitement to commit genocide,” including denying the existence of a Ukrainian identity; accusing Ukraine, contrary to evidence, of committing the very kinds of atrocities that Russia is or envisions committing; and dehumanizing rhetoric.

While analysis of Putin and Russian rhetoric has been extensive, it can make for a fragmented picture of the trend, with selections from relevant passages scattered across articles, social media, books, audio, and video. The following compilation seeks to collect examples of these statements in one place. They are organized in chronological order and necessarily non-exhaustive, since such declarations occur at high frequency in various media controlled by the Russian government, as expert monitors of Russian media such as Julia Davis and Francis Scarr have found.

The statements range from formal presidential addresses and articles by Putin and other officials to commentary on Russian state television and on social media. Sources include (but are not limited to) news articles; books; the Kremlin’s online repository of speeches and addresses; Russian state-controlled news agencies, including RIA Novosti and Kommersant; and posts on Twitter and Telegram.

This compilation, in chronological order, focuses on key words, phrases, and/or themes that appear to express intent on the part of the Russian government to eliminate Ukraine or Ukrainians as a nation-state, people, or culture. Recurring concepts include the notion of historical Russian and Ukrainian unity, denial of the Ukrainian nation, and the conceptualization of “Ukrainianism” as a fascist threat to Russian sovereignty. As the war progresses, it is vital to track these statements of intent for use by analysts, diplomats, policymakers, prosecutors, and more.

With thanks to Maksym Vishcyhk for contributing updates for this list.

(Readers may also be interested in Compilation of Countries’ Statements Calling Russian Actions in Ukraine “Genocide”by Elizabeth Whatcott.)

Collected Eliminationist Rhetoric by Putin and Associates

Russian President Vladimir Putin in reported comment to U.S. President George W. Bush – The NATO bloc broke up into blocking packages – Kommersant (April 7, 2008)

“You don’t understand, George, that Ukraine is not even a state. What is Ukraine? Part of its territories is Eastern Europe, but the greater part is a gift from us.” (Reported based on anonymous source as a Putin comment to Bush during the NATO Summit in Bucharest, Romania; reported in English on May 25, 2009, in Time Magazine. Neither that nor subsequent references identified to date indicated any effort to corroborate, and some analysts cast doubt on whether Putin made the comment. Some references translated “state” as “country,” which would be a more likely meaning, as in a sovereign State.)


Putin –  “Putin to the West: Hands off Ukraine” – Time Magazine (May 25, 2009)

Relations between “Big Russia and Little Russia — Ukraine…have always been the business of Russia itself.”

Putin – “Russia: The Ethnicity Issue” – Nezavisimaya Gazeta (January 23, 2012), (alternative translation by Russian site Top War)

Analysis:

 Russia’s unity is reliant upon “the absorption by the leader – first his ideas and then presumably in his acts – of all of these other groups. I was about to say national minorities, but that would have been wrong because, in Putin’s mind, and in [Ivan] Ilyn’s mind for that matter, there are no national minorities. Ilyn [a Russian fascist philosopher and source of ideological inspiration for Putin] was very clear that anyone who uses the phrase ‘national minority’ is attacking Russia.” – Snyder

Analysis: 

When Putin discusses Ukrainians in this vision, “he doesn’t mention the existence of the Ukrainian state; that’s irrelevant. All he mentions is that Ukrainians are a kind of fragment scattered across this broad expanse… This fragment will only be made whole insofar and as it is absorbed into this larger Russian civilization.” Putin also elaborates upon this notion of Russia as a whole civilization in a fascist manner. The “contours, the limits of that civilization are defined by the leader himself.” And, If Russia is divided, “it is the fault of others, who must be threatened and deterred.” Snyder


Putin – “Address by President of the Russian Federation” – Kremlin website (March 18, 2014)


Then-Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev quoted in a conversation with an industry watchdog official – “Russian Prime Minister: Ukraine Has ‘No Industry, or State” (April 5, 2016)


Russian economist and pundit Mikhail Khazin remarks – “They need to be partially eliminated” – YouTube video (December 27, 2016)


Former Putin aide Vladislav Surkov in Q&A – Surkov: “I’m Interested in Acting Against Reality” – Actual Comments website (February 26, 2020)


Putin – “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” – Kremlin (July 12, 2021)


Medvedev op-ed – “Why Contacts with the Current Ukrainian Leadership are Meaningless” – Kommersant (October 11, 2021)


Putin in press conference (February 8, 2022) and in official remarks (February 21, 2022) – An Independent Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation’s Breaches of the Genocide Convention in Ukraine and the Duty to Prevent – Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy


UPDATED Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov – Telegram posts by Kadyrov – Telegram (Feb. 21 – Nov. 26, 2022)


Putin declaring Russia’s full-scale assault on Ukraine – “Putin Orders ‘Special Military Operation’ for Ukraine” – Bloomberg News (February 24, 2022)


UPDATED Head of the Duma Committee on International Affairs Leonid Slutsky – Telegram posts by Slutsky – Telegram (Feb. 24, 2022 – Jan. 23, 2023)


Russian victory declaration, accidentally published – “The Offensive of Russia and the New World” – RIA Novosti (February 26, 2022, since deleted)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: 

This victory declaration “made it clear that Russia’s aim in this war was to destroy the Ukrainian state, destroy the Ukrainian nation, and then leave the remaining populace as a kind of unformed mass that could be colonized in any way the Russian leadership desired.” – Snyder


Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin – Telegram posts by Volodin – Telegram (March 15 – Oct. 13, 2022)

...continued

Dmitry Medvedev

Telegram posts by Medvedev – Telegram (March 17, 2022 – Feb. 3, 2023)


Russian head of occupation authority in Crimea Sergey Aksyonov –

Telegram posts by Aksyonov – Telegram (March 29, 2022 – Jan. 26, 2023)


Pro-Putin pundit Timofei Sergeitsev op-ed – “What Should Russia Do with Ukraine?” – RIA Novosti (April 5, 2022) (alternative translation by Mariia Kravchenko on Medium)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: 

Denazification in “official Russian usage just means the destruction of the Ukrainian state and nation. A ‘Nazi,’ as [Sergeitsev’s article] explains, is simply a human being who self-identifies as Ukrainian. According to [him], the establishment of a Ukrainian state thirty years ago was the ‘nazification of Ukraine.’ Indeed ‘any attempt to build such state’ has to be a ‘Nazi’ act.” – Snyder

Analysis comments by TULPPP: 

Analysis comments by TULPPP: 

History reveals that we “should take dictators at their word. Those who incite genocide usually attempt to follow through. It is not unusual for them to publicize their campaigns through propagandists and media. Adolf Hitler had Joseph Goebbels, Alfred Rosenberg and others doing this work. Putin has Medvedev and the pundits of Russian state media. Finally, the more that Russian soldiers embrace the campaign of ‘de-Ukrainization,’ the more brutal the war will become – and the harder it will be for Russia to find an exit short of total victory or defeat. Russian society’s complacency becomes complicity in murder.” – Hirsch

Analysis comments by TULPPP: 

This article is different from other Russian news sources for “two critical reasons. It was published amid Russia’s predatory war of aggression – while atrocities were being committed in Bucha, Mariupol and other towns, and while Ukrainian civilians were being kidnapped, deported and sent to filtration camps. It was being published during extreme wartime censorship in Russia, indicating its approval by the Russian authorities.” – Hirsch


UPDATED Vladimir Solovyov, pro-Kremlin presenter – Russian State TV Excerpts (April 7 – Dec. 17, 2022)


Russian State TV Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan and other pro-Putin figures or officials – “Ominous rhetoric gains ground in Russia as its forces founder in Ukraine” – Washington Post (April 13, 2022)


Mentions of Kyiv and Ukraine are removed from the textbooks of the Prosveshcheniye publishing house – Mediazona (April 23, 2022)


Karen Shakhnazarov, pundit and filmmaker – “‘There will be no mercy’ Putin mouthpiece warns of ‘concentration camps, sterilisation’” – excerpts from Russian State TV channel Rossiya 1 via Express (May 4, 2022, via May 5, 2022 article)


Russian political scientist Sergey Mikheev – Russian State TV Channel 1— translated by Francis Scarr of BBC Monitoring (May 8, 2022)

Analysis comments by TULPPP - SO SIMILAR TO NETANYAHU'S LANGUAGE & THE "UNITY" MESSAGE: 

Journalist Victoria Nikiforova op-ed – “It’s Time to Repeat” – RIA Novosti (May 9, 2022)

UPDATEDMaria Zakharova, Russian Foreign Ministry’s official spokeswoman – Telegram posts by Zakharova – Telegram (June 3 – Dec. 29, 2022)


Alexander Egortsev, Special Correspondent of the Spas TV Channel, which is aligned with the Russian Orthodox Church and had more than 1 million subscribers before being blocked by YouTube and moving its account to the Russian version, RuTube – Goat muzzle. Satanism and the occult have become the ideology of the Ukrainian national battalions – RIA Novosti (June 3, 2022) 


Dmitry Rogozin (Director General of Russia’s Roskosmos State Space Agency, former Deputy Prime Minister) – comments on his Twitter feed and Telegram channel (June 13 – June 27, 2022)


Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova – “Ukraine in its previous borders no longer possible” (June 17, 2022)


Rogozin – Telegram posts by Rogozin – Telegram (June 26 – 27, 2022)


Kirill Stremousov, deputy head of the Russian administration in occupied Kherson, Ukraine – Telegram posts by Stremousov – Telegram (June 29 – Oct. 21, 2022)


Vasily Fatigarov, Russian military expert – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by Francis Scarr of BBC Monitoring (June 30, 2022)


Putin – “Putin says Russia just starting in Ukraine, peace talks will get harder” – Reuters (July 7, 2022)


Russian political scientist Mikhail Markelov – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (July 13, 2022)


Simonyan – Russian State TV Excerpts –  translated by media monitor Julia Davis (July 19, 2022)


Nikolai Korsakov –The baptism of Russia and the special operation in Ukraine: what do they have in common? – Gazeta (July 28, 2022)


Head of State Duma Defense Committee Andrey Kartaolov – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 1, 2022)


Russian journalist and military expert Igor Korotchenko – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 5, 2022)


Soviet-Russian filmmaker Nikita Mikhalkov – excerpt from speech on the Ukrainian language – translated by media monitor Maksym Borodin (Aug. 26, 2022)


Russian mercenary Igor Mangushev – speech on the Russia – Ukraine war – translated by journalist Denys Kazanskyi (Aug. 28, 2022)


Putin – Address by the President of the Russian Federation (Sept. 21, 2022)


Putin – People’s Choice: Together Forever Concert Rally (Sept. 30, 2022)


Putin – Signing of treaties on accession of Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics and Zaporozhye and Kheron regions to Russia (Sept. 30, 2022)


NEW Andrey Sidorov, Deputy Dean of world politics at Moscow State University – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 9, 2022)

Analysis comments by TULPPP - SO JEW-HATING! 

Russia-aligned leader in the Donetsk “People’s Republic” of Ukraine Pavel Gubarev – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 11, 2022)

Member of the Russian State Duma Andrey Gurulyov – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 19, 2022)

Analysis comments by TULPPP:  SO BIBI NETANYAHU

Anton Krasovsky, then-Director of Broadcasting for RT (reportedly suspended after making this statement) – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 23, 2022)


Vladlen Tatarsky, Pro-Kremlin blogger and war correspondent – Interview with Russian State TV host Sergey Mardan – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Oct. 23, 2022)


NEW Oleg Karpovich, Director of the Institute of Contemporary Studies at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs  – “On the way to real denazification” – (Oct. 25, 2022)


Assistant Secretary of the Security Council of Russia Alexey Pavlov — What is cooked in the “witch’s cauldron.” Neo-pagan cults gain strength in Ukraine — Federal AIF (Oct. 26, 2022)

NEWPetr Akopov, Russian propagandist – “A new stage of the dismantling of Ukraine has begun” – RIA Novosti via DISCRED.RU (Nov. 10, 2022)

NEW Dmitry Steshin, war correspondent – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Nov. 19, 2022)

Analysis comments by TULPPP:  SO ISRAELI

NEW Boris Chernyshov, State Duma member – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Nov. 19, 2022)

NEWRostislav Ishchenko, political scientist – Interview with Russian State TV host Sergey Mardan – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Nov. 27, 2022)

NEW Yuri Kot, pro-government pundit – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Francis Scarr (Jan. 11, 2023)

NEW Vyacheslav Molotov, State Duma member – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Jan. 16, 2023)

https://www.justsecurity.org/81789/russias-eliminationist-rhetoric-against-ukraine-a-collection/

Putin – Answer to question about drone attack on Moscow and Moscow Region (May 30, 2023)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: SO BIBI

Andrey Norkin, State TV host – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (May 31, 2023)

Bogdan Bezpalko, Member of the Russian Council for Interethnic Relations – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (May 31, 2023)

Vlad Shlepchenko, journalist of nationalist pro-Putin media outlet – Ukrainian drones opened the way for cruise missiles to Moscow: There is only one way out! – Tsargrad (May 31, 2023)

Aleksandr Dugin, Russian political analyst – Comments at “What Kind of Ukraine Do We Need?” Forum in Moscow – via Russian news site PolitNavigator (June 1, 2023)


Natalya Nikanorova, Senator of the Donetsk People’s Republic – Comments at “What Kind of Ukraine Do We Need?” Forum in Moscow – via Russian state-owned news site Ukraina.ru (June 1, 2023)

Dmitry Evstafiev, School of Integrated Communications professor at HSE (Higher School of Economics) University – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 2, 2023 – June 10, 2023)


Vlad Shlepchenko, journalist of nationalist pro-Putin media outlet – Three cities of Ukraine that will save the Russians. Direction of impact marked – Tsargrad (June 2, 2023)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: DENAZIFICATION

Konstantin Zatulin, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, Eurasian Integration and Relations with Compatriots – The State Duma stated the failure of all Putin’s goals in Ukraine – The Moscow Times (June 3, 2023)

UPDATED Olga Skabeeva, State TV Host – Russian State TV Excerpts (June 4, 2023 – June 17, 2023)

Vladimir Skachko, journalist of Russian state-owned,  pro-Putin media outlet – How Ukrainians can save their immortal soul and mortal body – Ukraina.ru (June 5, 2023)


Yuri Knutov, Military Analyst – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 5, 2023)


Alexei Zhuravlyov, State Duma member – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 6, 2023)


Putin – Plenary session of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum (June 16, 2023)

Ishchenko – Interview with Ukraina.ru Correspondent Alexander Porunov – Ukraina.ru (June 17, 2023)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: DEMONIZING THEM AS EVIL just like bibi

Vyacheslav Nikonov, State Duma deputy – Russian State TV Excerpts – translated by media monitor Julia Davis (June 21, 2023)

NEW Yevgeny Nikiforov, head of the Orthodox Radio Channel “Radonezh” — Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 3, 2023)


NEW Sergei Markov, Putin’s former advisor — Russian State TV Excerpts (Aug. 5, 2023 – Aug. 11, 2023)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: like bibi the right to self defense against terrorists

NEW Ishchenko — Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 11, 2023)

NEW Ishchenko — “Nonviolent” suppression of Ukrainian as a strategy for Russian victory — via Russian state-owned news site Ukraina.ru (Aug. 21, 2023)


NEW Egor Kucher — The War is Lost, Ukraine has been Sentenced: Only Russia Can Save It — Tsargrad (Aug. 21, 2023)

NEW Ivan Lizan, Journalist — Having lost their heads, they don’t cry over their hair: about the main loss of Ukraine – Ukraina.ru (Aug. 24, 2023)


NEW Igor Markov, former politician — Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Aug. 28, 2023)

➤Return to Top of Page

NEW Elena Markosyan, political commentator— Russian State TV Excerpts — translated by media monitor Julia Davis (Sept. 2, 2023)

Analysis comments by TULPPP: THIS IS BIBI

NEW Skachko — Degradation as a path of development. New six “de-” of neo-Nazi Ukraine — Ukraina.ru (Sept. 10, 2023)

➤Return to Top of Page

NEW Ishchenko -– On the issue of the post-war structure of Ukraine – Ukraina.ru (Sept. 11, 2023)

For updated information, continue to this tracker: 

Russia's Eliminationist Rhetoric Against Ukraine: A Collection

CONTENTS | AUTO-GENERATED