Attn SMPD/FBI "Sal" Boroujerdi

Email: Attention NYTimes and FBI and National security council admiral, John Kirby

Re: hacker involved in spamhause ddns attack, largest attack on record at the time, Department of Justice lies about the Sony pictures hack with false attribution to North Korea, murder for EBT case, and white man privilege in Santa Monica.

(retired) Admiral John Kirby, spokesman, National Security Council:

May it please national security Council spokesperson John Kirby, to take note below of the national security issues related to the sentencing today of John Schiefer, who is wrongly convicted for murder in a crime of food stamps for murder for hire. 

Please excuse typos because I’m using voice to text. My computer has been stolen.

Let me first address some personal issues:

1. Sometimes the personal and the professional converge in unexpected ways. Here I am making the case that Palestinians have the right to life and the right to exist. Then I have a situation where the Santa Monica Police Department and Santa Monica City Council have determined that I do not have the right to exist. They have denied me basic public services. And I strongly urge Admiral John Kirby, Spokesperson for the National Security Council to consider The message she is sending to the rest of the world about the contempt that the United States has for Palestinian life is the same message he is sending to domestic law enforcement about black lives not mattering, and indigent defendants lives not mattering, and most American lives not mattering if they happen to be on the wrong side of the thin blue line, which is increasingly most of America.  

Let us discuss the national security issues.

###### National security council misrepresentations  ####

National security council spokesperson, John Kirby, note the following:

My friend, John Schiefer, who is capable of putting one bit of data per second against a data center 100 data centers has been sentenced to 25 years to life today for a murder he did not commit. He had no motive. The claims made by the prosecutor are absolutely insane. They claim that he would want nearly maxed out credit cards When he is able to buy the FBI on record in botroast Commit fraud from the comfort of his own home, sitting in front of a keyboard. Why would a man who has no record of physical violence, and who had played poker with Elon musk Decide to go into the street level crime of murder for hire (for food stamps) for a trivial amount of money that is worth less than the value of the Gucci sneakers on his feet at the time of his arrest?

The prosecutors from the Los Angeles county district attorneys Are Shane Michael, Jillian O’Neill, And supervisor Mara mcilvain Who has a long history of abuse of prosecutorial discretion, and flat out fraud.

The theory of the case against Mr. John Schiefer is that he accepted a contract for murder for higher for the amount of less than $2000, for the purposes of helping haena Worthing Obtain a house that she was not even entitled to get, and that she knew was in foreclosure, and that she also knew her mother was only going to get a fixed amount less than $250,000 that would only happen if the sale of the home proceeded. 

The prosecutors claim that Mr. Schiefer, who is aware of this situation, accepted a contract to murder The ex-husband of Debra Worthing, mother, Haena Worthing, Who all lived in this house that was about to be sold for the purposes of canceling the sale tha Haena continue to live in a house that she knew she had no title rights under the terms of the divorce already completed between her mother and her stepfather, and no ability to pay the hundred thousand dollars in taxes due on the house or the over $1 million mortgage still on the house under for foreclosure that was due to be sold shortly before Mr. Webster was killed and whose body was subsequently burned in the desert And easily discovered because it was not buried, and because Mr. Schiefer enabled there to be tracking of the journey, he took with Miss Worthing to the desert Because he believed it was very important that the family members be able to retrieve the body.

This is clearly a crazy story, but I think we know that given that Deborah, Worthing and Worthing had no assets and no income and other than high Worthing’s EBT (food stamps), The college educated and mentally ill and drug addicted Miss Worthing still had enough sense to know that she was not going to be able to cover the caring cost of nearly $14,000 per month on her stipend of government food stamps.

But again, this is the theory that we have a situation of murder for food stamps (EBT), because that is the only asset that Miss Worthing could provide to Mr. Schiefer, or anyone else in exchange for a contract killing.

Murder for food stamps to cover a $14,000 mortgage and for a $2.5 million house in Marina del Rey is the typical absurd Kind of theories presented by the Los Angeles county district . I should also add that the district attorney featured as state witness and LAPD criminologist who made the stunning Scientific discovery on the witness stand that skin has no DNA. Skin has no DNA. When asked by defense counsel on cross examination whether she was sure that skin had no DNA, the criminologist from the LAD affirmed again the new scientific discovery that human skin contains no DNA. Of course, this is nonsense. Anybody who watches any crime shows would know this criminologist made a ridiculous false claim. These are the kind of experts regularly touted by prosecution in the Los Angeles County criminal courts, which are a joke and a scam and a form of occupation. 

Bullshit is the standard of evidence for the district attorney in Los Angeles County. When people hear that the conviction rate in the occupied territories in the scam Courts is 100% they think that number is too high. 

When people hear that the conviction rate in Putin‘s Russia is 99% they think that number is too high. 

But why does no one question that the conviction rate in federal criminal courts in the year 2022 was 99%?  

Why does knowing the conviction rate in California that is damn close to 99%?

This story does sound preposterous and is clearly an example of a travesty of justice, but this is truly business as usual in Los Angeles County criminal courts, the largest criminal justice system of any county in the United States. Our corrupt law schools create a pipeline of new prosecutors like UCLA law graduate and deputy prosecutor Jillian O’Neill, who believes life sentences based on the absurdity of “Murder for Food Stamps” by a world reknown hacker is fair play. 

Why don’t you give Jillian jackass a call to get her statements about why she lied during sentencing today in order to try to get an even longer sentence for Mr. Schiefer? Why don’t you ask her why she and her colleagues had a warrant executed against me for having written a defense of Mr. Schiefer that I shared with public officials and the press? What a trifling little b*itch she is. Ditto for Shane Michael, and for supervisor Mara Mcilvain, who is Hitler personified!!!

Why don’t you ask the Chief of the Bureau of Investigations why he continues to hold property of mine seized last May in a search and seizure but doesn’t have the integrity to return my property now that he has clearly decide after 7 months that I pose no imminent danger as alleged by the corrupt prosecution team lynching Mr. Schiefer and his girlfriend.

John Schiefer lost his white privilege when he Became an indigent defendant. That is enough to take away his white privilege and the court of Los Angeles county. You can look up the spamhause attack which was reported to be one of the largest in history to get a sense of what John Schiefer can do. You can ask the FBI on what their thoughts are on the matter.

Reference: DDoS attack against Spamhaus was reportedly the largest in history | Network World

You wanna know something about the Sony hack, you should know that John was consulted by the FBI about this hack, and determined that it was not from the North Koreans contrary to public statements made by President Obama, and by the US attorney for the central district of California. You can ask the FBI for their point of view on the matter, And why they lied to cover up the true source of the hack in this press release below.

Reference Press Release: North Korean Regime-Backed Programmer Charged With Conspiracy to Conduct Multiple Cyber Attacks and Intrusions | United States Department of Justice

The Department of Justice lied in this press release. 

So are we to believe that there is some kind of North Korean super hacker who is the equivalent of throwing everything but the kitchen sink during a single quarter for a corporate firm Taking a hit all at once to get it over with? 

We can talk about some other things as well regarding government misrepresentations. John and I spent quite a lot of time together in the same cell, which you have to imagine is almost a zero probability event, unless you consider the fact that I worked for ibm systems and the booking system for the LA County Jail runs on a main frame. Is that a coincidence? How else can you explain the near zero probability of two blockchain experts, being in the same cell at the same time, in jail were 80% of the inmates are non-white, and a tiny tiny fraction have college education. What is the odd that at the age 47 that I would be put in jail for the first time in my life, after having no criminal history whatsoever?

—######  ***  ######—

Now, back to my personal intersection of my right to exist versus the Santa Monica Police Department, and the city council of Santa Monica, California, and the white male roommate who is seeking to frame me for the very crimes that he committed.

The email I received below from Antoine De Lartigue is textbook white male privilege. He is an example of what I call Karen xy, A reference, of course, to “Karen” Who called the cops on the black Mail birdwatcher in the park for no reason other than maliciousness.

So I have known exactly what Antoine De Lartigue has been up to for over a year and a half. He has to exploit my bogus criminal conviction and my Status as a racial minority for the purposes, of claiming that I am guilty of the very crimes that he is committed. It is An example of classic Zionist doublespeak. Whatever they say, is the opposite of the truth. Of course, Antoine is not a Zionist and not Jewish either but the tactics are exactly the same. 

So I suggest Antoine on copy feel free to respond to the entire New York Times and Columbia law school and FBI making the case that he is not guilty as charged by me since I am the truth. That is my brand. www.Tulppp.com

I should also add that this fellow has no regard for the fact that I am trying to intervene to save lives. My asymmetric Psych op skills have caused people to lose control And make mistakes that can be exploited. I have a lot of health problems now, so I’m not at the top of my game. But I’m not a liar my brand is the truth. See the correspondence below regarding my sad, personal situation at the age of 50 where I have to fight for my right to exist.

thank you for your consideration in this matter, and please let genocide Joe Biden know that Those of us, on the other side of the thin, blue line, do not appreciate our president denying the humanity of other human beings, because that means genocide Joe denies our humanity as well

See email below from my roommate, Antoine De Lartigue, claiming he is a victim of his own wide privilege being challenged.

Warm regards, BRYAN Gobin

original gangster on the west side

—######  ***  ######—

Email from me to Santa Monica Police

Re: Santa Monica Police Department incident number. 24-4883, Message from perpetrator Antoine De Lartigue below

Dear Sgt Goodwin and city Manager David Wright 

Please take note of the email that I received from perpetrator Antoine De Lartigue insinuating that he is a victim as opposed to the perpetrator.

He claims that he is a victim of physical violence and threats and defamation.

You can skip to below the signature because I don’t want to trouble you reading too much. What is below *** Is my commentary to the press and to the district attorney candidates, and not relevant for your investigation or your response. Thank you for your assistance.

—######  ***  ######—

Since he is a white male, I suppose you should hurry up and protect him from a man that is 10 years younger than him and that has physical disabilities and that is a foot shorter than he is.

Surely Santa Monica police should provide protection to the white male Who feels Threatened by my challenge, through peaceful and lawful means to deny him His white privilege that entitles him under your sponsorship to Act with impunity while engaged in criminal acts physically assault me and vandalize my property, and steal my property.

Since the Los Angeles district attorney challengers on  copy are so concerned about crime Perhaps John Hatami will tweet demanding action for the white man’s protection or perhaps, Nathan Nochman Also known as Batman will come to The white man’s rescue.  Surely we must protect white privilege in Los Angeles County and surely we must preserve apartheid in Los Angeles County.  Surely the challenges will demand a response from District attorney George Gascon Who they regard as soft on crime. 

Please do not protect the victim. Do your duty to protect apartheid regime.

See note below from aggressor Antoine Digue who is now the victim. 

Bryan Gobin

Ph. (702) 358-7554

Email from Perpetrator Antoine de Lartigue, Falsely Claiming he is the victim. I called 911 on him!!!

Thu, Jan 18, 2024 

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:41 PM Antoine de Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com> wrote:

Mr Bryan Gobin,

Your continuous actions to harass, threaten, physically assault and defame Antoine de Lartigue are punishable by California Law.

This is your notice to cease and desist all activity against Antoine de Lartigue, harassement, threats, physical assault, defamation, and all other actions punishable by California Law.

Antoine de Lartigue

Subject: Press Update-Arrested by Overpaid Santa Monica Cops webpage - My Detainment / Excessive Force Bogus Charges - SMPD - Santa Monica - Nothing more to say "Sal"

Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:18 PM

To: <Mashhoud.Boroujerdi@santamonica.gov>, <Walter.Ramirez@santamonica.gov>
Cc: Press, Santa Monica PD, City Council, City Attorney---and LA DA, FBI, Deans of Law Schools, Law faculty

From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com>

Dear Officer Sal Boroujerdi,

You know you had me detained under BULLSHIT pretenses. YOu had enough info from me BEFORE we met based on our brief conversations to KNOW you had ZERO probable cause to harass me and have me locked up---not for jail but for a mental health evaluation--which I assure you, the doctor thought I was bonkers for going toe-to-toe with cops because cops are violent, barbaric, entitled, lawless thugs---like Zionists.

See new webpage---more to piss off the cops---they are not proud to have their numbers reported because they know are running a RACKET.

https://www.tulppp.com/police

If you think you have a "criminal threat" based on my call to report an incident where Off. Walter Ramirez hung up the phone on me after I made the point to him that he has no clue what he's talking point, using my own conviction as an example which is posted on my website---then by all means, RELEASE THE TAPES TO THE PUBLIC--But your department Can't even find incident number from December 2023, let alone NON-incident related items like calls to dispatch. Pathetic. Pathetic, Pathetic. YOur department charges $30 just to begin digging through their own disorganized files.

And if you think you scare me with the possibility of Officer Ramirez testifying about B-52 USAF Jet Bombers on a call where he rudely hung up on me AFTER giving me misinformation due to his lack of training, then by all means---GO FOR PROSECUTION--

YOU APPARENTLY THINK IT'S CRAZY FOR ME DEMAND THE SERVICE THAT I AM ENTITLED TO, AND THAT YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING.

Enjoy the updates to the webpage...teachers v. cops--cops are running a union racket sucking up public resources and not doing a good job. Full stop. It's like the cops are on strike.

https://www.tulppp.com/police

Subject: City council my arrest by pathetic chief LATIDE-Reporter on a deadline (Handling of Thefts-Santa Monica) Sgt Lozano - Grand Larceny Investigation / B. Gobin Incident# 24-4883.

Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 6:39 PM

From: Value Veracity <valueveracity@gmail.com>

To: City Council, City Attorney, Chief of Police

Attention city council

I was detained for over 40 hours because Ramon Batista got his little panties, twisted because I made fun of his sorry ass service. He somehow thinks that arresting me is going to somehow make me feel more Grateful to his service. 

 Apparently the way to get some service, and Santa Monica is to make fun of the fact that the officer that came to assist and instead discriminated against me, in fact, has not paid his child support.

That is the way to get some “probable cause” for Ramon Batista to get off his ass.

Only when he has his little ego hurt by an officer, who makes the absurd claim that I’m going to blow up the FBI on coffee, which is absolutely ridiculous. Is there any attention whatsoever?

Serve and protect means, serve and protect their own asses.

--------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Pacific GrovePD <pacificgrovepd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: LATIDE-Reporter on a deadline (Handling of Thefts-Santa Monica) Sgt Lozano - Grand Larceny Investigation / B. Gobin Incident# 24-4883.
To: <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>
CC: Santa Monica Police Department

You can arrest me and detain me. I am not intimidated. Release the tapes where Ramirez hung up the phone. Probable cause means hurt cop feelings.

Release the tapes. Release your evidence. I call you for help and you try to threaten me for complaining about your lousy service. Think again if this is going to work for intimidating me.

Press on bcc

City council on bcc

On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 1:56 AM bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com> wrote:

To:Mass Email to Police

My uncle died in the line of duty and my cousin is now a state trooper in Florida. I have many family members who have served in the Armed Forces, and some are law enforcement officers. I resent the treatment I have received by your department. Many staffers look for any excuse Not to do a damn thing. I find this conduct disgusting and revolting especially in light of the fact that Cali Cops are paid extraordinarily well---and your education programs are a racket Union College. University of San Diego---BS education---90 percent of credit for "life experience" where you act like jackassess. Let me also add that last year marked the death toll of firefighters dying from sickness related to working at the World Trade Center site equaling the number of firefighters that died that day. Read about Brooklyn firefighters. I know this because I was there and witnessed the South Tower fall. And Senator Rand Paul signed a $2 Trillion tax cut with enthusiasm but balked at funding the 9/11 victims fund. That's fcking plutocratic, anti-democratic, anti-American vile and disgusting conduct.

You have a job to do--Don't LIE to be about the criteria for probable cause or the penal code, which sergeants apparently do not fcking know.

Your record system is a public safety threat because you can't even pull goddamn incident reports at headquarters let alone when you are responding to a 911 service call. Your systems are terrible; this is a statewide problem; and it reflects the fact that the top brass in this state apparently suck--because they are having their dicks sucked by vendors like AXON which has put your lives in danger and civliian lives in dangers with their faulty products. I'd kill these Axon criminal motherfckers.  Enjoy the link. http://tinyurl.com/tulppp-police-smpd

I should have asked for a Barista but I got a Batista. He wants a war.  You got it...We're at War. You fck with my life You fck with my public safety. I will fck with anybody anywhere any fcking time who dares put my life at risk, and tells me between the lines that Ni'gga you ain't getting no service, and we'll treat you like fcking Ni'gga for daring to call us.

---------- Forwarded message ---------

Subject: LATIDE-Reporter on a deadline (Handling of Thefts-Santa Monica) Sgt Lozano - Grand Larceny Investigation / B. Gobin Incident# 24-4883.

Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 1:42 AM

 To: <alphonso.lozano@santamonica.gov>, BRYAN Gobin (Personal-702) <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>, Y Antoine De Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com>, ramon Batista <Ramon.Batista@santamonica.gov>, <jorge.zendejas@santamonica.gov>, <attorney.mailbox@santamonica.gov>, <douglas.sloan@santamonica.gov>, <Scott.delcrognale@santamonica.gov>
Cc: City Council, City Attorney, District Attorney Los Angeles County

 From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>

Santa Monica PD et al---If there are any mistakes that I made on my website, particularly regarding John Alle or City Council Members or SMPD officers, such as Deadbeat dad beat cop Scott.delcrognale, please let me know by 5pm Tomorrow (saturday), Jan 20. Thanks in advance. I'll be trashing your performance on a global basis. You deserve credit for your Apartheid occupation and sense of entitlement.

see link.

http://tinyurl.com/tulppp-police-smpd

Dear Sgt Lozano,

I looked forward to hearing from you about the detectives being assigned to TWO incidences of LARCENY including incident #24-4883 and incident#(see your files) from December when I had reported property removal without my consent EXPRESSLY Denied,

Again, we had ONLY discussed assigning detectives to ONE out of TWO incidents. I wish for BOTH incidents to be addressed.

The 2nd incident occurred on 26 December if memory serves me correctly--FOUR officers eventually responded to this call and congregated in my living room. Later Sgt Zendejas on copy responded separately due to my 2nd call on account of receiving such poor service from your department that I feared for my own personal safety due to your responding officer's criminalizing the citizen calling for assistance by making presumptions that the white male perpetrator was more credible than the person calling for assistance.

Per our conversation ,  please take note of the following,

I have found my property in my apartment "hidden" underneath piles of DVDs in a chest of drawers in the same room in which they had "disappeared" resulting in my 911 call after making inquiries with my two roommates if they had any knowledge about the disappearance of my property in the living room between the hours of 5am and 8.30am

Per the references below, there was "probable cause" to believe that in the absence of forced entry, and the unlikely scenario that someone other than the suspect who had to the key to the apartment would have taken my property given recent calls in December about EXACTLY the same issue of Larceny, you DID in fact have probable cause to execute a search warrant-

Per the elements of Grand Larceny--which are included below for your reference, 

I was deprived of use of my property for two days;

There was obvious INTENT to deprive me use of my property since the Suspect DENIED having taken my property, and any other unidentified Suspects would have presumably intended to deprive me of use

no one has claimed responsibility for having moved my property or 'hidden' my property where I would not reasonably find it had I not gone on a hunting expedition yesterday evening which result in a delightful recovery of property.

I have no idea about the whereabouts of my property.

See references below

California Penal Code § 487 defines “grand theft” as stealing more than $950 worth of personal property, real estate, money, or labor. Stealing $950 or less is treated as the lesser crime of petty theft.1

Grand theft also comprises stealing someone else’s property directly from their person or stealing their motor vehicle or firearm – no matter the monetary value.2

Grand theft is a wobbler.3 This means it can be either a misdemeanor or a felony:4

Grand theft charge

California penalties

Misdemeanor

Up to 1 year in jail

Felony

16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in jail

Examples of grand theft

·     Shoplifting a piece of jewelry that has a $1,000 price tag,

·     Embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from an employer, and

·     Breaking into a house and stealing electronics worth several thousand dollars.

Shoplifting at a high-end store can easily invite California grand theft charges.

Legal defenses to grand theft

·     You did not intend to steal,

·     The allegedly stolen property actually belonged to you,

·     The person who owned the item consented to you taking it, and/or

·     Someone falsely accused you.

In order to help you better understand the law, our California criminal defense attorneys will address the following:

·     1. What is the legal definition of grand theft in California?

o  1.1. Theft by larceny

o  1.2. Theft by false pretense

o  1.3. Theft by trick

o  1.4. Theft by embezzlement

o  1.5. Wage theft

·     2. How does grand theft differ from petty theft?

·     3. What are the penalties for a Penal Code 487 PC conviction?

·     4. How can I fight the charges?

·     5. PC 487 Grand theft and related offenses

·     6. Additional reading

If after reading this article, you have additional questions, we invite you to contact us at Shouse Law Group.

Penal Code 487 PC defines grand theft as stealing property valued at more than $950.00.

1. What is the legal definition of grand theft in California?

There are different ways you can commit grand theft. The elements of the offense depend on the kind of grand theft that the prosecutor is charging.

1.1. Grand theft by larceny

Simply put, the form of theft known as “larceny” occurs when you physically carry off another person’s tangible property.

The legal definition of grand theft by larceny is:

·     1. You took possession of property owned by someone else;

·     2. You did not have permission from the owner to take the property;

·     3. When you took the property, you intended either

o  to deprive the owner of it permanently, or

o  to take it away from the owner for a period of time long enough that they would be deprived of a significant portion of the value or enjoyment of it; AND

·     You moved the property (this can be a very short distance) and kept it for a period of time (however brief).5

Simple shoplifting cases can lead to charges of grand theft by larceny if the total value of the stolen items exceeds $950.00.6

3. What are the penalties for a Penal Code 487 PC conviction?

3.1. “Wobbler” penalties

California Penal Code 487 PC “grand theft” is, in most cases, a wobbler. This means that the prosecutor may charge this offense as either a misdemeanor or a felony.24

If you are convicted of grand theft as a misdemeanor, you face up to one (1) year in county jail.25

If you are convicted of grand theft as a felony, you face:

·     felony probation with up to one year of county jail time, or

·     sixteen (16) months, two (2) years or three (3) years in county jail (unless the theft was of a firearm).26

The decision to file charges for misdemeanor grand theft or felony grand theft is up to the prosecutor’s discretion. They will usually base the decision on

1.    the circumstances of your case, and

2.    your criminal history.

From <https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/487/#2>

CALCRIM No. 1801 THEFT AND EXTORTION

 From <https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/calcrim/1800/1801/>

If you conclude that the defendant committed a theft, you must decide

whether the crime was grand theft or petty theft.

[The defendant committed petty theft if (he/she) stole property [or

services] worth $950 or less.]

[The defendant committed grand theft if the value of the property [or

services] is more than $950.]

[Theft of property from the person is grand theft if the value of the

property is more than $950. Theft is from the person if the property

taken was in the clothing of, on the body of, or in a container held or

carried by, that person.]

[Theft of (an automobile/a horse/ <insert other item listed in

statute>) is grand theft if the value of the property is more than $950.]

[Theft of a firearm is grand theft.]

[Theft of (fruit/nuts/ <insert other item listed in statute>)

worth more than $950 is grand theft.]

[Theft of (fish/shellfish/aquacultural products/ <insert other

item listed in statute>) worth more than $950 is grand theft if (it/they)

(is/are) taken from a (commercial fishery/research operation).]

[The value of <insert relevant item enumerated in Pen. Code,

§ 487(b)(1)(B)> may be established by evidence proving that on the day

of the theft, the same items of the same variety and weight as those

stolen had a wholesale value of more than $950.]

[The value of (property/services) is the fair (market value of the

property/market wage for the services performed).]

<Fair Market Value - Generally>

[Fair market value is the highest price the property would reasonably

have been sold for in the open market at the time of, and in the general

location of, the theft.]

<Fair Market Value - Urgent Sale>

[Fair market value is the price a reasonable buyer and seller would agree

on if the buyer wanted to buy the property and the seller wanted to sell

it, but neither was under an urgent need to buy or sell.]

The People have the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that

the theft was grand theft rather than a lesser crime. If the People have

From <https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/calcrim/1800/1801/>

SECTION 484-502.9

484.  (a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry,
lead, or drive away the personal property of another, or who shall
fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted to him or
her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or
fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of
money, labor or real or personal property, or who causes or procures
others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character
and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby
fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or
obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft.  In
determining the value of the property obtained, for the purposes of
this section, the reasonable and fair market value shall be the test,
and in determining the value of services received the contract price
shall be the test.  If there be no contract price, the reasonable
and going wage for the service rendered shall govern.  For the
purposes of this section, any false or fraudulent representation or
pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any
money, property or service received as a result thereof, and the
complaint, information or indictment may charge that the crime was
committed on any date during the particular period in question.  The
hiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each
of them of every labor claim due and unpaid and every judgment that
the employer has been unable to meet shall be prima facie evidence of
intent to defraud.

From <https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2007/pen/484-502.9.html> a

Subject: Attn: sgt lozano - thief admitted taking property

Date: Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:02 AM

To: Ashley Allen <ashley.allen@santamonica.gov>, <David.White@santamonica.gov>, Douglas A. Murray <dmurray@da.lacounty.gov>, <Ramon.Batista@santamonica.gov>, Richard Elias <richard.elias@santamonica.gov>, Wing, David A. <DAWing@lasd.org>, Y Antoine De Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com>, <alphonso.lozano@santamonica.gov>, bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com>, <rarcos@da.lacounty.gov>

From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>

Dear Sgt lozano

The thief who stole my electronics did in fact, acknowledge yesterday that he did take my electronics. Specifically, in my last verbal encounter with him when I asked him to return my property, he said “ No, fuck you bitch, fuck you bitch.”

This Was repeated I’m not sure how many times, but the bottom line is that this is acknowledgment of the theft that was perpetuated against me.

I do hope you’re able to promptly recover my property. 

If you have any other questions, feel free to call. The thief is on copy.

Bryan Gobin
Ph. (702) 358-7554

Connect with me on LinkedIn